Séré de Rivières system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Séré de Rivières system was an ensemble of fortifications built from 1874 and first used at the beginning of the First World War along the frontiers and coasts of France. It derived its name from the man who conceived it, Raymond Adolphe Séré de Rivières.

Aerial photograph, Fort de Douaumont, Verdun (1916).

Origin of the system[edit]

Entry, Fort d'Uxegney

Following the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, France found itself seriously weakened and isolated from the rest of Europe, menaced by Germany and stung by the loss of Alsace-Lorraine.

At the same time as the departure of the last German troops, France created the "Defense Committee" (Comité de Défense), active between 1872 and 1888, whose mission was to reorganize the defense of France's frontiers and coastal lands. To accomplish that, it was necessary to compensate for the lost territories of the Northeast, to modernize old fortifications which had been shown to be wanting in the last war, and to create new fortifications adapted to new combat techniques. In particular, the greatly improved effectiveness of artillery in the new age demanded new measures.

The committee was created by a Presidential decree on 28 July 1872, with nine members from the Ministry of War and representatives from artillery and military engineering. General Séré de Rivières, commander of engineering for the Second Army Corps of Versailles, was named secretary of the committee in 1873, and on 1 February 1874 was promoted to Chief of Engineers. During the ensuing years, Séré de Rivières was re-elected head of the committee with all powers necessary to realize his ideas without opposition.

The first works of the new French fortification system were launched in 1874.

In 1880, when the work was already quite advanced and after some internal rivalries and political machinations, General Séré de Rivières was removed from the Defense Committee. In spite of this, the work was continued, trench by trench.

The 1874 fortifications[edit]

Since the fortifications executed by Vauban, fortifications had not evolved during the course of the 19th century. During the conflicts of 1870 their shortcomings became clear: the principal of the "impregnable citadel" could not resist the assaults. It was necessary to re-think strongpoints and adapt them to the progress of artillery. Gone were citadels surrounding towns: forts were to be moved to the outside of the cities some 12 km to keep the enemy at a distance so their artillery could not bombard the city center. From now on a ring of forts were to be built at a spacing that would allow them to effectively cover the intervals between them.

The new forts abandoned the principle of the bastion, which had also been made obsolete by advances in arms. The outline was a much simplified polygon, surrounded by a ditch that was covered by caponiers. These forts, built in masonry and shaped stone, were designed to shelter their garrison against bombardment. The fort's artillery was laid out on top of the fort in the open air.

One organizing feature of the new system involved the construction of two defensive curtains: an outer line of forts, backed by an inner ring or line of forts d’arrêt at critical points of terrain or junctions, along with great number of coastal batteries. Examples of the first sort may be found at Verdun, Toul, Épinal, Belfort in the northeast, as well as Paris, and Brest. Forts d'arrêts may be found at Manonviller, (Meurthe-et-Moselle) et de Bourlémont (Vosges).

The explosive shell crisis[edit]

From 1883 to 1885 a revolution occurred in artillery with the introduction of new materials and techniques, notably the introduction of rifled artillery and much more powerful explosives, such as picric acid. These developments multiplied the power of artillery against fortifications. Tests against the fort at Malmaison indicated that forts built previously had been made obsolete. Masonry forts were insufficiently resistant, and the artillery on their superstructures was extremely vulnerable. A new solution was required.

The answer was found in the use of high-strength concrete, which was more resistant than masonry to explosive. The development of reinforced concrete would allow the new fortifications to deal with the new threat. However, forts already constructed constituted a large portion of the system. The decision was made to downgrade some of the new forts and to improve others. Concrete was added to cover some forts, burying vulnerable portions such as magazines behind the new material.

Armor[edit]

Advances in the iron and steel industries allowed the new forts to use armor in innovative ways. In 1875 the Mougin system of laminated armor using rolled iron was first used in casemates to provide protection against field guns. Rolled iron gave way to cast iron, providing protection against siege guns. Mougin also devised a revolving cast iron turret for 155 mm guns. However, cast iron was not altogether suitable for protection against explosive shells, and its use was discontinued in 1882.

Beginning in 1885, steel was substituted for cast iron. Such non-retractable, or non-eclipsing turrets could avoid direct-fire damage to their gun embrasures only by facing away from the direction of fire. Eclipsing turrets were developed that could retract in the face of such attack, leaving only their top surfaces exposed. Such turrets were expensive and complex, with serious problems of noise and ventilation, but were shown to be effective. Where possible, casemated artillery was used, due to the lower cost of such an emplacement.

While heavy armament was being armored, lighter armament and observers were also protected. A range of armored machine gun and observation positions were developed and were widely installed.

Armored observatory (Fort de Villey-le-Sec).

Defensive arrangement[edit]

The Séré de Rivières was based on the concepts of the fortified town and the defensive screen. The towns were intended to furnish locations for eventual counter-attack, while the defensive curtain prevented passage by an attacker. The screen was not continuous, and was arranged to channel an attack to a secondary line of fortified towns. Other such systems were intended to delay the progress of an attack in order to build up defensive forces.

Organization[edit]

Military railroad at the Fort de Villey-le-Sec.

A typical defended point consisted of a circle of forts about ten kilometers from the center, surrounding a town. The forts were able to provide mutual support and could fire on one another to suppress attacks. In addition to the principal forts, smaller works were provided to support the infantry in the intervals between forts. Such works provided shelter to infantry during bombardment and may contain reserve artillery.

A support network of 60 cm railways extended behind the lines to provide logistics. Known as the Péchot system, it was first installed at Toul and was adopted as a standard in 1888.

The forts[edit]

Entry to Battery Sanchey, near Épinal

Three basic varieties of forts were constructed: stop forts, screening forts and point defense forts. Forts may be further categorized by their state of modernization.

Stop forts were intended to be autonomous, able to function in isolation from the rest of the system and assuring their own defense. Such forts could fire in all directions.

Screening forts were intended to lend mutual support to others of their kind and generally defended on one front. Their artillery focused on specific areas of control.

First generation forts[edit]

Prior to modernization, these forts were built entirely of masonry, using large quantities of shaped stone. The forts were provided with a ditch, six to twelve meters wide and bounded by the main wall of the fort on one side and a counterscarp on the opposing side. Moats were unusual features at Séré de Rivières; most ditches were dry. Some walls were crenelated for defense, and many had caponiers at angles to fire along the length of the ditch. Entries were typically by drawbridges.

Inside the fort's perimeter were multi-story barracks with facades facing interior courtyards. Barracks were typically semi-recessed into the walls and included mess halls, kitchens and cisterns. Powder magazines were buried for protection from artillery, located behind triple-locked double doors, and illuminated indirectly from lamp rooms to prevent accidental explosion.

The artillery was laid out in the open air on top of the ramparts. Shelters were provided for ready ammunition. In some cases, artillery was located in armored casemates or Mougin turrets. Special infantry positions were provided for defense of the ditch.

Modernized forts[edit]

After the rise of the explosive shell the most important forts were modernized. A supplementary shell of concrete was placed over the masonry to protect against the new artillery. In some cases, entirely new concrete casemates were built, leaving the stone casemates alone.

The most vulnerable locations in the fort were the magazines, which in the modernized forts were dispersed and more deeply buried. Protected paths were created along the ramparts, along with protected sally ports giving on to the ditch, and galleries within the counterscarps looking back at the fort.

Artillery was removed from the ramparts and placed under shelter of concrete. While the number of artillery pieces declined, the new equipment was as effective as the former batteries. Eclipsing infantry positions and observation cloches were also provided. The newest forts of this time were given central electrical plants.

Forts after 1885[edit]

These forts were built in concrete from the beginning, but due to budget cuts were smaller in scale than their predecessors.

Wartime improvisation[edit]

During the Battle of Verdun the troops, under a flood of fire and fearing for the concrete fort, excavated new galleries under the fort for shelter and living quarters. Some of these galleries connected neighboring fortifications, foreshadowing the connected systems of the Maginot Line. The so-called travaux de 17 (built in 1917) prefigured this advance as well.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  • Philippe Truttmann, La Barrière de Fer, Gérard Klopp, Luxembourg, 2000. (French)
  • Guy Le Hallé, Le système Séré de Rivières ou le témoignage des pierres, Ysec Editions, Louviers, 2001, ISBN 2-84673-008-3 (French)

External links[edit]

Notes[edit]