Saw (2004 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Saw (movie))
Jump to: navigation, search
Saw
The line "How much blood would you shed to stay alive?" hovers over a young woman trapped in one of the film's most featured traps, the "reverse bear trap"
Theatrical release poster
Directed by James Wan
Produced by Gregg Hoffman
Mark Burg
Oren Koules
Screenplay by Leigh Whannell
Story by James Wan
Leigh Whannell
Starring Cary Elwes
Danny Glover
Monica Potter
Michael Emerson
Ken Leung
Tobin Bell
Leigh Whannell
Music by Charlie Clouser
Cinematography David A. Armstrong
Edited by Kevin Greutert
Production
company
Distributed by Lionsgate
Release dates
  • January 19, 2004 (2004-01-19) (Sundance)
  • October 29, 2004 (2004-10-29)
Running time
102 minutes[1]
Country United States
Language English
Budget $1.2 million[2]
Box office $103.9 million[2]

Saw is a 2004 American[note 1] independent horror film directed by James Wan. The screenplay, written by Leigh Whannell, is based on a story by Wan and Whannell. The film stars Cary Elwes, Danny Glover, Monica Potter, Michael Emerson, Ken Leung, Tobin Bell, and Leigh Whannell. It is the debut of Wan and Whannell and the first installment of the seven-part Saw franchise.

The film's story revolves around Adam (Whannell) and Lawrence (Elwes), two men who are chained in a dilapidated subterranean bathroom and are each given instructions via a microcassette recorder explaining how to escape. Adam is told he must escape the bathroom, while Lawrence is told to kill Adam before a certain time, or Lawrence's family will die. Meanwhile, police detectives investigate and attempt to find the victims' location and apprehend the mastermind behind the current "game" and several other similar incidents.

The screenplay was written in 2001, but after failed attempts to get the script produced in Wan and Whannell's home country, Australia, they were urged to travel to Los Angeles. In order to help attract producers they shot a low-budget short film of the same name from a scene out of the script. This proved successful in 2003 as producers from Evolution Entertainment were immediately attached and also formed a horror genre production label Twisted Pictures. The film was given a small budget and shot for 18 days.

Saw was first screened on January 19, 2004. Lionsgate picked up the rights and released the film in the United States and Canada on October 29, 2004. Critical responses were generally mixed and divided, but the film gained a cult following. Compared to its low budget, Saw performed very well at the box office, grossing more than $100 million worldwide and becoming, at the time, one of the most profitable horror films since 1996's Scream. The success of the film prompted a green-light of a sequel soon after Saw '​s opening weekend, which was released the following October.[6]

The film was theatrically re-released by Lionsgate on October 31, 2014 to celebrate its tenth anniversary.[7]

Plot[edit]

Adam Stanheight, a photographer, awakens in a bathtub in a large industrial bathroom. He gets out and finds himself chained at the ankle to a pipe. Dr. Lawrence Gordon, an oncologist, is chained to a pipe across the room, and between them lies a corpse, holding a revolver and a microcassette recorder. They each find a tape in their pocket, and Adam manages to retrieve the recorder. Adam's tape instructs him to escape the bathroom or he will die where he sits, and Lawrence's tape instructs him to kill Adam before six o'clock or not only will he die where he sits, but Alison and Diana, his wife and daughter, will die as well. Using a clue at the end of the tape, Adam finds a bag in the toilet tank containing two hacksaws, which they use to try cutting through their chains. Adam's saw breaks, and he throws it at the mirror in frustration. Lawrence realizes the hacksaws are meant for their feet and tells Adam that they have been captured by the Jigsaw Killer, who Lawrence is aware of because he was once a suspect.

Flashbacks show that five months earlier, while Lawrence was discussing a cancer patient named John Kramer, with some medical students and an orderly named Zep Hindle, he was approached by Detectives David Tapp and Steven Sing, who found his penlight at the scene of a Jigsaw game. His alibi cleared him, but he agreed to witness the testimony of a heroin addict named Amanda Young, the only known survivor of a Jigsaw game. In her game, a reverse beartrap was locked on her head and set to rip her jaws apart in one minute, but she killed her cellmate in order to retrieve the key from his stomach and remove the trap. Other victims include Paul Leahy, who died trying to escape a caged-in maze lined with razor wire, and Mark Wilson, who had to obtain the antidote for a slow-acting poison in his body from a safe by locating the combination on the room's walls with a candle. Not only was he naked and covered in napalm, but he was also forced to walk across broken glass barefoot, and was burned alive when he fumbled with the candle.

In the present, Alison and Diana are held captive in their home by a man watching Adam and Lawrence through a camera hidden behind the bathroom's two-way mirror. The Gordons' house is simultaneously being watched by Tapp, who has become obsessed with finding Jigsaw. Flashbacks reveal that Tapp and Sing located Jigsaw's warehouse using Amanda's videotape, and saved a man who was bound to a chair with drills aimed at his neck. Jigsaw fled after slashing Tapp's throat with a concealed wrist blade, and Sing was killed by a shotgun trap while pursuing him. Tapp was then discharged for entering Jigsaw's lair without a warrant and began stalking Lawrence, convinced that he is Jigsaw. In the bathroom, Adam and Lawrence follow a clue and find a box containing a one-way cellphone, and two cigarettes. They attempt to use a "poisoned" cigarette to stage Adam's death, but this is proven false when Adam's chain suddenly shocks him.

Adam then recalls his abduction. Upon returning home to develop photos, he fell asleep in his darkroom. He awoke to find his entire apartment without light, and while searching for an intruder, he discovered a puppet and was attacked by a pig-masked figure. Lawrence was similarly abducted by a pig-masked figure in a parking garage. Lawrence receives a call from Alison, who at gunpoint tells him not to trust Adam. At Lawrence's prompting, Adam admits he was being paid to take photos of Lawrence, and shows him photos from the bag that contained the hacksaws. This starts an argument, during which it is revealed that Lawrence was having an affair with Carla Song, one of his medical students. After urging Adam to describe the man who was paying him, he realizes it was Tapp. Adam then notices a photo he didn't take of a man staring out a window of Lawrence's house. Lawrence identifies him as Zep, who is revealed to be the man holding Alison and Diana captive, but the clock strikes six o'clock as he realizes this. Zep moves to kill Alison and Diana, but Alison, who managed to untie herself, attacks him as he holds the phone to her ear to tell Lawrence he failed. They fight for the gun gaining Tapp's attention in the process, and he arrives in time to save Alison and Diana.

Tapp chases Zep and eventually confronts him in an underground room, where he is shot after a brief struggle. Lawrence, only aware of gunshots and screaming, is shocked and loses reach of the phone. Desperate to save his family, Lawrence frantically saws off his foot and shoots Adam with the corpse's revolver. Soon afterwards, Zep enters the bathroom intent on killing Lawrence, but is knocked to the ground and beaten to death with the toilet tank's cover by Adam, who only suffered a flesh wound. Lawrence crawls away after promising to bring back help, and Adam searches Zep's body for a key. He instead finds another recorder, which reveals that Zep was another victim: he was instructed to oversee their game in order to obtain the antidote for the slow-acting poison in his body. As the tape ends, the corpse in the middle of the room rises, revealing himself as John Kramer, the real Jigsaw Killer. He tells Adam that the key is in the bathtub, which was sucked down the drain when Adam first awoke. When Adam attempts to shoot John, he is shocked with a remote control causing him to lose reach of the gun. John then turns off the lights and seals the bathroom door, leaving Adam to die.

Cast[edit]

For more details on the cast and characters, see List of Saw cast members and List of Saw characters.
It took one day for Shawnee Smith's scenes to be shot, which Wan described as "physically taxing".[8]

Production[edit]

Development and writing[edit]

Wan (left) and Whannell (right)

After finishing film school, Australian director James Wan and Australian writer Leigh Whannell wanted to write and fund a film.[9] The inspiration that they needed came after watching the low-budget independent film, The Blair Witch Project. Another film that inspired them to finance the film themselves was Darren Aronofsky's Pi.[10] The two thought the cheapest script to shoot would involve two actors in one room.[11] Whannell said, "So I actually think the restrictions we had on our bank accounts at the time, the fact that we wanted to keep the film contained, helped us come up with the ideas in the film."[12] One idea was to have the entire film set with two actors stuck in an elevator and being shot in the point of view of security cameras.[11]

Wan pitched the idea to Whannell of two men chained to opposite sides of a bathroom with a dead body in the middle of the floor and they are trying to figure out why and how they are there. By the end of the film they realize the person lying on the floor is not dead and he is the reason they are locked in the room. Whannell initially did not give Wan the reaction he was looking for. He said, "I'll never forget that day. I remember hanging up the phone and started just going over it in my head, and without any sort of long period of pondering, I opened my diary that I had at the time and wrote the word 'Saw'."[11] Before instantaneously writing the word "Saw" in a blood-red, dripping font, the two had not come up with a title. "It was one of those moments that made me aware that some things just really are meant to be. Some things are just waiting there to be discovered," Whannell said.[11]

The character of Jigsaw did not come until months later, when Whannell was working at a job he was unhappy with and began having migraines. Convinced it was a brain tumor,[13] he went to a neurologists to have an MRI and while sitting nervously in the waiting room he thought, "What if you were given the news that you had a tumor and you were going to die soon? How would you react to that?"[9] He imagined the character Jigsaw having been given one or two years to live and combined that with the idea of Jigsaw putting others in a literal version of the situation, but only giving them a few minutes to choose their fate.[9]

Wan did not intend to make a "torture porn" film as the script only had one short segment of "torture." He said the film "played out like a mystery thriller." It was not until the sequels that the plot focused more on torture scenes.[9]

Funding[edit]

Whannell and Wan initially had $30,000 to spend on the film, but as the script developed it was clear that more funds would be needed.[10] The script was optioned by a producer in Sydney for a year but the deal eventually fell through.[11] After other failed attempts to get the script produced in Australia from 2001 to 2002,[9] literary agent Ken Greenblat read the script and suggested they travel to Los Angeles, where their chances of finding an interested studio were greater.[14] Wan and Whannell initially refused, due to lack of traveling funds but the pair's agent, Stacey Testro, convinced them to go.[14] In order to help studios take interest in the script, Whannell provided A$5,000 (US$5,000) to make a seven-minute short film based on the script's jaw trap scene, which they thought would prove most effective. Whannell played David, the man wearing the Reverse Bear Trap. Working at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Whannell and Wan knew cameramen who were willing to provide technical assistance for the short.[15]

"I guess the term 'torture-porn' doesn't affect me one way or the other. I don't love the term, nor do I really hate it. For me, it's kind of hard to have any bad feelings about the term, because I guess torture-porn has given me a lot of good things, like being able to work in the film industry and work as a screenwriter. I guess I'm just thankful to be part of a film that made it, and anything after that is just a champagne problem."

—Leigh Whannell (screenwriter) on his feelings of the film being labeled "torture porn"[9]

Wan shot the short with a 16mm camera[13] in over two days and transferred the footage to DVDs to ship along with the script. Whannell wanted to play the lead character in the feature film. The short helped show that Wan and Whannell was a "director-actor team" rather than just wanting to sell the script. Wan said, "Leigh and I just loved the project so much and we wanted a career in filmmaking so we stuck to our guns and said, 'Look, guys, if you want this project, we're coming on board - Leigh has to act in it and I have to direct it."[14]

In early 2003,[16] while in Los Angeles and before they met with producer Gregg Hoffman, Hoffman's friend pulled him into his office and showed him the short. Hoffman said, "About two or three minutes into it, my jaw hit the floor."[17] He quickly showed the short and script to his partners Mark Burg and Oren Koules of Evolution Entertainment.[9] They later formed Twisted Pictures as a horror genre production label.[18] The producers read the screenplay that night and two days later offered Wan and Whannell creative control and 25% of the net profits.[19] Even though Wan and Whannell received "better offers" from studios like DreamWorks and Gold Circle Films, they were not willing to chance Wan's directing and Whannell acting in the lead role.[9] In order to finance the film, Hoffman, Burg, and Koules put up a second mortgage on their Highland Avenue headquarters.[20] Saw was given a production budget of between $1 million and $1.2 million.[note 2]

Casting[edit]

Bell's small role had a big impact on the film's ending and was listed as one of the "greatest" twist endings by AMC.[23]

Elwes was sent the short film on DVD and immediately became interested in the film. He read the script in one sitting and was drawn in by the "uniqueness and originality" of the story.[24] To prepare for his role as an oncologist, he met with a doctor at UCLA's Department of Neurosurgery.[25]

Smith, who is not a horror fan,[26] initially refused the role, calling the script "horrific." However, after watching the short, she agreed to the role, which was the part that Whannell portrayed in the short.[27]

On taking the role of Jigsaw, Bell said - "I did Saw because I thought it was a fascinating location for a film to be made. These guys locked in a room, to me, was fresh. I did not anticipate the ending when I read the script, so I was quite caught by surprise and it was clear to me that if the filmmakers shot the scene well, the audience would be caught by surprise as well. The film was worth doing for that moment alone."[11]

Filming and post-production[edit]

With a shooting budget of $700,000,[9][28] Saw began principal photography on September 22, 2003[20] at Lacy Street Production Facility in Los Angeles[17] for 18 days.[28] The bathroom was the only set that had to be built.[29] Danny Glover completed his scenes in two days.[30] Due to the tight shooting schedule, Wan could not afford to shoot more than a couple of takes per actor.[31] "It was a really tough struggle for me. Every day, it was me fighting to get the shots I did not get. I had high aspirations, but there’s only so much you can do. I wanted to make it in a very Hitchcockian style of filmmaking, but that style of filmmaking takes time to set up and so on," Wan said about the very short shooting schedule.[9] He said the style instead ended up being "more gritty and rough around the edges due to the lack of time and money that we had to shoot the movie with" and it ultimately became the aesthetic of the film.[9]

In post-production, Wan found he did not have enough shots or takes to work with as he was basically shooting rehearsals. Having a lot of missing gaps in the final product, he and editor Kevin Greutert created shots to mend together during editing; such as making a shot look like a surveillance camera feed and using still photographs. "We did a lot of things to fill in gaps throughout the film. Whatever we cut to newspaper clippings and stuff like that, or we cut to surveillance cameras, or we cut to still photography within the film, which now people say, 'Wow, that's such a cool experimental style of filmmaking', we really did that out of necessity to fill in gaps we did not get during the filming," he explained.[9]

Music[edit]

See also: Hello Zepp
Saw: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
Soundtrack album by Various Artists
Released October 5, 2004
Recorded 2004
Genre Alternative rock, electro-industrial
Length 57:29
Label Koch
Various Artists chronology
Saw: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
(2004)
Saw II: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
(2005)

The soundtrack was mainly composed by Charlie Clouser, which took six weeks to complete.[32] Other songs were performed by Front Line Assembly, Fear Factory, Enemy, Pitbull Daycare and Psycho Pumps. Megadeth's song "Die Dead Enough" was originally set to be featured in the film, but was not used for undisclosed reasons.[33][34]

The soundtrack was released on October 5, 2004 by Koch Records. Johnny Loftus of Allmusic gave it three out of five stars. He said that Clouser "really nails it with his creaky, clammy score" and that he "understands that Saw '​s horror only works with a heady amount of camp, and he draws from industrial music in the same way." He particularly liked, "Cigarette"; "Hello, Adam"; and "F**k This S*!t," commenting that they "blend chilling sounds with harsh percussion and deep-wound keyboard stabs."[35]

Release[edit]

Lionsgate picked up Saw '​s worldwide distribution rights at the Sundance Film Festival days before the film premiered on January 19, 2004.[36] There it played to a packed theater for three nights to a very positive reaction.[16] It was the closing film at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 18, 2004.[21] Lionsgate initially planned to release the film direct-to-video, but due to the positive reaction at Sundance, they chose to release it theatrically by Halloween.[19] It was released on October 1, 2004 in the United Kingdom, October 29, 2004 in the United States and December 2, 2004 in Australia. The film was originally rated NC-17 (No children under 17 permitted) by the Motion Picture Association of America for strong graphic violence, though after being re-edited, it was released with an R rating.[29][37] Lionsgate held the first annual "Give Til It Hurts" blood drive for the Red Cross and collected 4,249 pints of blood.[38][39]

Tenth Anniversary Re-Release[edit]

On October 31, 2014, in honor of the film's 10th anniversary, Saw was re-released to theatres for one week.

Home media[edit]

The theatrical version of the film was released on VHS and DVD on February 15, 2005 in the United States. After its first week, it made $9.4 million in DVD rentals and $1.7 million in VHS rentals, making it the top rental of the week.[40] For the second week it remained as the number one DVD rental with $6.8 million, for a $16.27 million two-week total. It dropped to third place in VHS rentals with $1.09 million, for a $2.83 million two-week total.[41] The film went on to sell more than $70 million worth of video and DVDs.[16] A two-disc "Uncut Edition" was released on October 18, 2005 to tie in with the release of Saw II. The short film, also entitled Saw, was included on the DVD.[42]

Reception[edit]

Box office[edit]

Saw opened at #3 on Halloween weekend 2004 in 2,315 theaters and grossed $18.2 million, behind Ray ($20 million) and The Grudge ($21.8 million).[43] According to Lionsgate's exit poll, 60% of the mostly male audience was under 25 years of age. Saw had also become Lionsgate's second best opening, after Fahrenheit 9/11 '​s $23.9 million (2004).[44] On its second weekend, an additional 152 theaters were added, bringing the theater count to 2,467. It dropped to number four, making $11 million, a 39% drop from the opening weekend.[45]

Saw opened in the United Kingdom to $2.2 million in 301 theaters, grossing a $12.3 million total in seven weeks.[46] In Australia, it opened in 161 theaters with $1.2 million and totaled out to $3.1 million in six weeks.[47] In Italy, the film opened on January 14, 2005 in 267 theaters to $1.7 million and grossed $6.4 million in six weeks.[48] Saw opened to $1.5 million 187 theaters in France on March 16, 2005 and made $3.1 million by the end of its four-week run.[49] Saw came to gross $55.1 million in the United States and Canada and $47.9 million in other markets for a worldwide total of $103 million.[2] It is the second lowest grossing film in the series after Saw VI.[50] At the time, it became the most profitable horror film after Scream (1996).[51]

Release date
(United States)
Budget
(estimated)
Box office revenue[2]
United States/Canada Other markets Worldwide
October 29, 2004 $1,200,000 $55,185,045 $47,911,300 $103,096,345

Critical reviews[edit]

Cary Elwes played the part of Dr. Lawrence Gordon and later reprised his role in the seventh film.

Critical reception to Saw was mixed. On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film a rating of 48%, based on 181 reviews, with an average rating of 5.5/10. The site's consensus reads, "Saw is more than nasty enough for genre junkies, but far too twisted, gory, and shallow for more discerning horror fans."[52] Metacritic gave the film a score of 46 out of 100, based on 32 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[53]

Dennis Harvey of Variety gave the film a negative review after its Sundance premiere. He called it a "crude concoction sewn together from the severed parts of prior horror/serial killer pics." He called the screenplay "convoluted," criticizing the use of "flashbacks within flashbacks" and red herrings. He described the film as being "too hyperbolic to be genuinely disturbing."[3] Carla Meyer of the San Francisco Chronicle gave the film a positive review saying the film "combined B-movie acting with a twisted mind-set and visual tricks designed to camouflage cheap effects" and that it was "terrifying at some moments and insinuatingly creepy at many others." She called the killing scenes "amazingly evocative for such a low-budget movie."[54]

Empire '​s Kim Newman gave the film four out of five stars. He said Saw is styled like early David Fincher films and "boasts an intricate structure - complex flashbacks-within-flashbacks explain how the characters have come to this crisis - and a satisfying mystery to go with its ghastly claustrophobia." He ended his review saying, "As good an all-out, non-camp horror movie as we've had lately."[55] Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly gave the film a B minus, calling it "derivative and messy and too nonsensical for its own good." He described Jigsaw's intent as "to show you the serial killer lurking inside yourself." Gleiberman criticized Elwes' performance by saying, "[Elwes] ought to be featured in a seminar on the perils of overacting."[56] Daniel M. Kimmel of the Telegram & Gazette called it "one of the most loathsome films this critic has seen in more than 20 years on the job."[57]

The New York Times '​s Stephen Holden gave a mixed review saying the film "does a better-than-average job of conveying the panic and helplessness of men terrorized by a sadist in a degrading environment, but it is still not especially scary. What sets its demon apart from run-of-the-mill movie serial killers is his impulse to humiliate and torture his victims and justify it with some twisted morality." He said the film is "seriously undermined by the half-baked, formulaic detective story in which the horror is framed."[58] Carina Chocano of the Los Angeles Times also gave the film a mixed review saying, "Saw is so full of twists it ends up getting snarled. For all of his flashy engineering and inventive torture scenarios, the Jigsaw Killer comes across as an amateur. Hannibal Lecter would have him for lunch." She said the film "carelessly underscores its own shaky narrative at every turn with its mid-budget hokiness." She also noted that Elwes and Whannell had trouble keeping an American accent.[59] Another mixed review came from Roger Ebert, who gave the film 2 out of 4 stars and lamented the gimmicks and plot contrivances but nonetheless described Saw as "well made and acted, and does what it does about as well as it could be expected to."[60]

Comparisons to Seven (1995)[edit]

When asked if the 1995 thriller film Seven was an inspiration to Saw, Whannell said "For me as the writer, definitely. I mean, Seven is just a very well constructed film, and if you're writing a thriller, it can't hurt to study it. In terms of the story though, James and I never really felt Seven was that close to our film. I guess if you stand back, you have two detectives chasing a psychopath, who uses vile methods to teach people lessons, and those points echo Seven. What we always liked about Saw, though, was the fact that the story is told from the point of view of two of the psychopath's victims, instead of the police chasing after him, as you so often see."[13] Entertainment Weekly '​s Owen Gleiberman compared the plot to Seven saying, "In a blatant imitation of Seven, Saw features a lunatic sadist whose ghoulish crimes are meant, in each case, to mirror the sins of his victims. The twist here is that the psycho doesn't do the killing."[56] Richard J. Leskosky of Champaign-Urbana's The News-Gazette said "Saw wants to be taken as another Seven. Though it features perverse gross-out scenes and a villain with a superficially pedantic motive behind his crimes (his victims, if they survive, have learned to appreciate life more), it lacks the finesse and polish of the David Fincher film."[61]

Accolades[edit]

On Empire magazine's list of the 500 greatest films, Saw ranked 499th.[62] Bloody Disgusting ranked the film tenth in its list of the Top 20 Horror Films of the Decade, with the article calling Saw "perhaps the most influential horror film of the decade, which kick-started a franchise.... In light of its measly $1.2 million price tag the film's quality relative to bigger-budget horror films is striking. It also takes itself seriously, which came as a breath of fresh air following the trend of wimpy tongue-in-cheek horror that had dominated the multiplexes post-Scream. More than anything, this twisted morality tale is a film made by horror fans, for horror fans; it’s gory, it's depraved, and best of all it introduced a new horror icon in Jigsaw."[63] The Daily Telegraph listed the film number 14 on their Top 100 list that defined the 2000s.[64]

Award Category Recipient(s) Result
Brussels International Festival of Fantasy Film Pegasus Audience Award James Wan Won
Fantasporto International Fantasy Film Award- Best Film James Wan Won
Golden Trailer Awards Best Horror Won
Gérardmer Film Festival Special Jury Prize James Wan Won
Youth Jury Grand Prize James Wan Won
MTV Movie Awards Best Frightened Performance Cary Elwes Won
San Sebastián International Film Festival Audience Award- Best Feature James Wan Won
Satellite Awards Outstanding DVD Extras (Uncut Edition) Won
Saturn Award Best DVD Special Edition Release Won
Best Horror Film Won
Teen Choice Awards Choice Movie Scream Scene Leigh Whannell Won
Choice Movie: Thriller Won

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The film was funded by American dollars[3] and is registered under the U.S. Copyright Office.[4] Wan also said: "Initially the script was going to be made in Australia so it had a lot of Australian themes to it, but it became an American film."[5]
  2. ^ Sources for the budget figure vary. Some put the budget at $1 million,[21] $1.15 million[22] and $1.2 million.[14]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "SAW (18)". British Board of Film Classification. 2004-08-10. Retrieved 2013-05-11. 
  2. ^ a b c d "Saw". 
  3. ^ a b Harvey, Dennis (January 27, 2004). "Sundance Review". Variety (Reed Business Information). Archived from the original on August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  4. ^ "Saw. Motion Picture". United States Copyright Office. May 17, 2004. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  5. ^ Fischer, Paul (October 25, 2004). "Interview: James Wan, Leigh Whannell for "Saw"". Dark Horizons. Archived from the original on August 18, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2011. 
  6. ^ Otto, Jeff (February 9, 2005). "IGN Interviews James Wan and Leigh Whannell". IGN. News Corporation. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  7. ^ Vejvoda, Jim (August 28, 2014). "Saw returning to theatres for its 10th anniversary". IGN. News Corporation. Retrieved August 28, 2014. 
  8. ^ Fallon, John (2004). "The Arrow Interviews James Wan". JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Tobias, Scott (October 29, 2010). "Saw creators Leigh Whannell and James Wan". The A.V. Club (The Onion). Archived from the original on August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  10. ^ a b Walker, Sarah (September 2004). "Saw Cuts Deep". Fangoria (236): 50. ISSN 0164-2111. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f Albin, Andrea (October 26, 2010). "Special Feature: 'Saw Revisited: Jigsaw's Long Journey'". Bloody Disgusting. The Collective. Archived from the original on September 17, 2011. Retrieved September 17, 2011. 
  12. ^ Otto, Jeff (October 27, 2004). "Interview: James Wan and Leigh Whannell". IGN. News Corporation. p. 1. Archived from the original on August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  13. ^ a b c Fallon, John (2004). "The Arrow Interviews Leigh Whannell". JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  14. ^ a b c d "They came, Saw, conquered". The Sydney Morning Herald (Fairfax Media). November 24, 2004. Archived from the original on August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  15. ^ Otto, Jeff (October 27, 2004). "Interview: James Wan and Leigh Whannell". IGN. News Corporation. p. 2. Archived from the original on August 16, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  16. ^ a b c A. Fernandez, Jay (October 20, 2008). ""Saw" horror franchise faces test with 5th movie". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 18, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2011. 
  17. ^ a b "Saw Production Notes" (1.18MB .DOC file download). Lionsgate. 2004. Archived from the original on September 26, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011. 
  18. ^ Harris, Dana (March 2, 2005). "Twisted, LG find way into 'Catacombs'". Variety. Reed Business Information. Archived from the original on September 28, 2011. Retrieved September 28, 2011. 
  19. ^ a b Lidz, Franz (October 25, 2009). "As the ' Saw ' turns". The Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, Virginia: Landmark Media Enterprises). 
  20. ^ a b Fleming, Mike (January 11, 2004). "'Saw' comes, conquers". Variety. Reed Business Information. Archived from the original on September 21, 2011. Retrieved September 21, 2011. 
  21. ^ a b Alexander, Chris (June 11, 2006). "Saw's Unkindest Cutssaw's Unkindest Cuts". Toronto Star (Torstar). 
  22. ^ Lidz, Franz (October 21, 2009). "Limbs Pile Up, and Money, Too". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 18, 2011. Retrieved September 18, 2011. 
  23. ^ Dirks, Tim. "Greatest Movie Plot Twists, Spoilers and Surprise Endings". Filmsite.org. AMC. Archived from the original on September 19, 2011. Retrieved September 17, 2011. 
  24. ^ Otto, Jeff (October 26, 2004). "IGN Interviews Cary Elwes". IGN. News Corporation. p. 1. Retrieved August 18, 2011. 
  25. ^ Otto, Jeff (October 26, 2004). "IGN Interviews Cary Elwes". IGN. News Corporation. p. 2. Archived from the original on September 15, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2011. 
  26. ^ Wieselman, Jarett (July 13, 2009). "Shawnee Smith: "I Can't Watch Horror Movies"". New York Post. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  27. ^ Condit, Jon (December 2, 2004). "Glover, Danny & Smith, Shawnee (Saw)". DreadCentral. CraveOnline. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  28. ^ a b Messer, Ron (April 4, 2011). "James Wan & Leigh Whannell Insidious Interview; The Saw Creators Also Discuss Their Untitled Sci-Fi Project, Nihtfall, and Recent Horror Remakes". Collider.com. Archived from the original on August 18, 2011. Retrieved April 4, 2011. 
  29. ^ a b Fallon, John (2004). "The Arrow interviews Gregg Hoffman, Oren Koules & Mark Burg". JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  30. ^ Otto, Jeff (October 27, 2004). "Interview: James Wan and Leigh Whannell". IGN. News Corporation. p. 3. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  31. ^ "Saw: Director James Wan & Writer/Star Leigh Whannell". Bloody Disgusting. The Collective. Archived from the original on August 18, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2011. 
  32. ^ Spence D. (November 1, 2004). "Charlie Clouser Interview". IGN. News Corporation. p. 3. Archived from the original on September 15, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  33. ^ "MEGADETH: 'Die Dead Enough' Single To Be Featured In Upcoming Horror Film". Blabbermouth.net. July 26, 2004. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  34. ^ "Producer: MEGADETH's 'Die Dead Enough' Not Featured In 'Saw' Movie". Blabbermouth.net. July 28, 2004. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  35. ^ Loftus, Johnny. "Saw (Original) Motion Picture Soundtrack". Allmusic. All Media Guide. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  36. ^ "Lions Gate Gets World Rights To Sundance Midnight Film "Saw"". indieWire. January 13, 2004. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  37. ^ Abele, Robert (October 28, 2004). "An outsider mentality". Los Angeles Times (Tribune Company). Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  38. ^ "American Red Cross Partners With Lionsgate on SAW IV Blood Drive". Red Cross. August 6, 2007. Archived from the original on September 12, 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2011. 
  39. ^ McClintock, Pamela (October 9, 2006). "Inside Move: 'Saw' gets into bloody vein for promo poster". Variety. Reed Business Information. Archived from the original on September 12, 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2011. 
  40. ^ "Seeing Saw". The Numbers. Nash Information Services. February 24, 2005. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  41. ^ "Saw Remains on Top of Belated Rental Charts". The Numbers. Nash Information Services. March 5, 2005. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  42. ^ "Details and specifications for Saw (Special Edition, Uncut) on DVD". DVD Town. Archived from the original on September 15, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  43. ^ "Weekend Box Office Results for October 29–31, 2004". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. November 1, 2004. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  44. ^ Gray, Brandon (November 1, 2004). "'Ray,' 'Saw' See Robust Bows". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  45. ^ "Weekend Box Office Results for October 5–7, 2004". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. November 8, 2004. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  46. ^ "United Kingdom and Ireland and Malta Weekend Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. November 14, 2004. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  47. ^ "Australia Weekend Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. March 10, 2005. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  48. ^ "Italy Weekend Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. February 20, 2005. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  49. ^ "France and Algeria, Monaco, Morocco and Tunisia Weekend Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. April 12, 2005. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  50. ^ "'Saw' vs 'Saw'". Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  51. ^ Foundas, Scott (August 30, 2011). "Splattered: An Interview with James Wan Talking torture, politics and not-so-sweet revenge". LA Weekly. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 
  52. ^ "Saw (2004)". Rotten Tomatoes. Flixster. Retrieved November 3, 2014. 
  53. ^ "Saw Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved October 28, 2014. 
  54. ^ Meyer, Carla (October 29, 2004). "Cheap Thrills Sharpen Grisly 'Saw'". San Francisco Chronicle. Hearst Corporation. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  55. ^ Newman, Kim (April 1, 2006). "Saw". Empire. Bauer Media Group. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  56. ^ a b Gleiberman, Owen (October 27, 2004). "Saw Review". Entertainment Weekly. Time Inc. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  57. ^ M. Kimmel, Daniel (October 30, 2004). "Many will wish they'd never seen `Saw'". Telegram & Gazette (The New York Times Company). 
  58. ^ Holden, Stephen (October 29, 2004). "A Gore Fest, With Overtones of Iraq and TV". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  59. ^ Chocano, Carina (October 29, 2004). "'Saw' would work better if sharpened". Los Angeles Times. Tribune Company. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  60. ^ Roger Ebert (2004) "Saw", accessed 10 April 2013
  61. ^ J. Leskosky, Richard (November 4, 2004). "Improbable ' Saw ' surprises, but still not worth a see". The News-Gazette (Champaign-Urbana, IL). 
  62. ^ "The 500 Greatest Movies Of All Time". Empire. Bauer Media Group. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved August 17, 2011. 
  63. ^ "00's Retrospect: Bloody Disgusting's Top 20 Films of the Decade...Part 3". Bloody Disgusting. The Collective. December 17, 2009. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved January 3, 2010. 
  64. ^ Gritten, David; Robey, Tim; Sandhu, Sukhdev (November 6, 2009). "The films that defined the noughties". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011. 

External links[edit]