# Schauder basis

In mathematics, a Schauder basis or countable basis is similar to the usual (Hamel) basis of a vector space; the difference is that Hamel bases use linear combinations that are finite sums, while for Schauder bases they may be infinite sums. This makes Schauder bases more suitable for the analysis of infinite-dimensional topological vector spaces including Banach spaces.

Schauder bases were described by Juliusz Schauder in 1927,[1][2] although such bases were discussed earlier. For example, the Haar basis was given in 1909, and G. Faber discussed in 1910 a basis for continuous functions on an interval, sometimes called a Faber–Schauder system.[3]

## Definitions

Let V denote a Banach space over the field F. A Schauder basis is a sequence {bn} of elements of V such that for every element vV there exists a unique sequence {αn} of scalars in F so that

$v = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \alpha_n b_n,$

where the convergence is understood with respect to the norm topology, i.e.,

$\lim_{n \to \infty} \left \| v - \sum_{k=0}^n \alpha_k b_k \right\|_V = 0.$

Schauder bases can also be defined analogously in a general topological vector space. As opposed to a Hamel basis, the elements of the basis must be ordered since the series may not converge unconditionally.

A Schauder basis {bn}n ≥ 0 is said to be normalized when all the basis vectors have norm 1 in the Banach space V.

A sequence {xn}n ≥ 0 in V is a basic sequence if it is a Schauder basis of its closed linear span.

Two Schauder bases, {bn} in V and {cn} in W, are said to be equivalent if there exist two constants c > 0 and C such that for every integer N ≥ 0 and all sequences {αn} of scalars,

$c \left \| \sum_{k=0}^N \alpha_k b_k \right\|_V \le \left \| \sum_{k=0}^N \alpha_k c_k \right \|_W \le C \left \| \sum_{k=0}^N \alpha_k b_k \right \|_V.$

A family of vectors in V is total if its linear span (the set of finite linear combinations) is dense in V. If V is a Hilbert space, an orthogonal basis is a total subset B of V such that elements in B are nonzero and pairwise orthogonal. Further, when each element in B has norm 1, then B is an orthonormal basis of V.

## Properties

Let {bn} be a Schauder basis of a Banach space V over F = R or C. It follows from the Banach–Steinhaus theorem that the linear mappings {Pn} defined by

$v = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \alpha_k b_k \ \ \overset{\textstyle P_n}{\longrightarrow} \ \ P_n(v) = \sum_{k = 0}^n \alpha_k b_k$

are uniformly bounded by some constant C. When C = 1, the basis is called a monotone basis. The maps {Pn} are the basis projections.

Let {b*n} denote the coordinate functionals, where b*n assigns to every vector v in V the coordinate αn of v in the above expansion. Each b*n is a bounded linear functional on V. Indeed, for every vector v in V,

$|b^*_n(v)| \; \|b_n\|_V = |\alpha_n| \; \|b_n\|_V = \|\alpha_n b_n\|_V = \|P_n(v) - P_{n-1}(v)\|_V \le 2 C \|v\|_V.$

These functionals {b*n} are called biorthogonal functionals associated to the basis {bn}. When the basis {bn} is normalized, the coordinate functionals {b*n} have norm ≤ 2C in the continuous dual V ′ of V.

A Banach space with a Schauder basis is necessarily separable, but the converse is false, as described below. Since every vector v in a Banach space V with a Schauder basis is the limit of Pn(v), with Pn of finite rank and uniformly bounded, such a space V satisfies the bounded approximation property.

A theorem attributed to Mazur[4] asserts that every infinite-dimensional Banach space V contains a basic sequence, i.e., there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of V that has a Schauder basis. The basis problem is the question asked by Banach, whether every separable Banach space has a Schauder basis. This was negatively answered by Per Enflo who constructed a separable Banach space failing the approximation property, thus a space without a Schauder basis.[5]

## Examples

The standard unit vector bases of c0, and of p for 1 ≤ p < ∞, are monotone Schauder bases. In this unit vector basis {bn}, the vector bn in V = c0 or in V = ℓp is the scalar sequence {bn, j}j where all coordinates bn, j are 0, except the nth coordinate:

$b_n = \{b_{n, j}\}_{j=0}^\infty \in V, \ \ b_{n, j} = \delta_{n, j},$

where δn, j is the Kronecker delta. The space ℓ is not separable, and therefore has no Schauder basis.

Every orthonormal basis in a separable Hilbert space is a Schauder basis. Every countable orthonormal basis is equivalent to the standard unit vector basis in ℓ2.

The Haar system is an example of a basis for Lp([0, 1]), when 1 ≤ p < ∞.[2] When 1 < p < ∞, another example is the trigonometric system defined below. The Banach space C([0, 1]) of continuous functions on the interval [0, 1], with the supremum norm, admits a Schauder basis. The Faber–Schauder system is the most commonly used Schauder basis for C([0, 1]).[3][6]

Several bases for classical spaces were discovered before Banach's book appeared (Banach (1932)), but some other cases remained open for a long time. For example, the question of whether the disk algebra A(D) has a Schauder basis remained open for more than forty years, until Bočkarev showed in 1974 that a basis constructed from the Franklin system exists in A(D).[7] One can also prove that the periodic Franklin system[8] is a basis for a Banach space Ar isomorphic to A(D).[9] This space Ar consists of all complex continuous functions on the unit circle T whose conjugate function is also continuous. The Franklin system is another Schauder basis for C([0, 1]),[10] and it is a Schauder basis in Lp([0, 1]) when 1 ≤ p < ∞.[11] Systems derived from the Franklin system give bases in the space C1([0, 1]2) of differentiable functions on the unit square.[12] The existence of a Schauder basis in C1([0, 1]2) was a question from Banach's book.[13]

### Relation to Fourier series

Let {xn} be, in the real case, the sequence of functions

$\{ 1, \cos (x), \sin (x), \cos(2x), \sin(2x), \cos(3x), \sin(3x), \ldots \}$

or, in the complex case,

$\left \{ 1, e^{ix}, e^{-ix}, e^{2ix}, e^{-2ix}, e^{3ix}, e^{-3ix}, \ldots \right \}.$

The sequence {xn} is called the trigonometric system. It is a Schauder basis for the space Lp([0, 2π]) for any p such that 1 < p < ∞. For p = 2, this is the content of the Riesz–Fischer theorem, and for p ≠ 2, it is a consequence of the boundedness on the space Lp([0, 2π]) of the Hilbert transform on the circle. It follows from this boundedness that the projections PN defined by

$\left \{ f : x \to \sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty} c_k e^{i k x} \right \} \ \overset{P_N}{\longrightarrow} \ \left \{ P_N f : x \to \sum_{k=-N}^{N} c_k e^{i k x} \right \}$

are uniformly bounded on Lp([0, 2π]) when 1 < p < ∞. This family of maps {PN} is equicontinuous and tends to the identity on the dense subset consisting of trigonometric polynomials. It follows that PNf tends to f in Lp-norm for every fLp([0, 2π]). In other words, {xn} is a Schauder basis of Lp([0, 2π]).[14]

However, the set {xn} is not a Schauder basis for L1([0, 2π]). This means that there are functions in L1 whose Fourier series does not converge in the L1 norm, or equivalently, that the projections PN are not uniformly bounded in L1-norm. Also, the set {xn} is not a Schauder basis for C([0, 2π]).

### Bases for spaces of operators

The space K(ℓ2) of compact operators on the Hilbert space ℓ2 has a Schauder basis. For every x, y in ℓ2, let xy denote the rank one operator v ∈ ℓ2 → <v, x> y. If {en}n ≥ 1 is the standard orthonormal basis of ℓ2, a basis for K(ℓ2) is given by the sequence[15]

\begin{align} & e_1 \otimes e_1, \ \ e_1 \otimes e_2, \; e_2 \otimes e_2, \; e_2 \otimes e_1, \ldots, \\ & e_1 \otimes e_n, e_2 \otimes e_n, \ldots, e_n \otimes e_n, e_n \otimes e_{n-1}, \ldots, e_n \otimes e_1, \ldots \end{align}

For every n, the sequence consisting of the n2 first vectors in this basis is a suitable ordering of the family {ejek}, for 1 ≤ j, kn.

The preceding result can be generalized: a Banach space X with a basis has the approximation property, so the space K(X) of compact operators on X is isometrically isomorphic[16] to the injective tensor product

$X' \widehat \otimes_\varepsilon X \simeq \mathcal{K}(X).$

If X is a Banach space with a Schauder basis {en}n ≥ 1 such that the biorthogonal functionals are a basis of the dual, that is to say, a Banach space with a shrinking basis, then the space K(X) admits a basis formed by the rank one operators e *jek : ve *j(v) ek, with the same ordering as before.[15] This applies in particular to every reflexive Banach space X with a Schauder basis

On the other hand, the space B(ℓ2) has no basis, since it is non-separable. Moreover, B(ℓ2) does not have the approximation property.[17]

## Unconditionality

A Schauder basis {bn} is unconditional if whenever the series $\sum \alpha_nb_n$ converges, it converges unconditionally. For a Schauder basis {bn}, this is equivalent to the existence of a constant C such that

$\Bigl\| \sum_{k=0}^n \varepsilon_k \alpha_k b_k \Bigr\|_V \le C \Bigl\| \sum_{k=0}^n \alpha_k b_k \Bigr\|_V$

for all integers n, all scalar coefficients {αk} and all signs εk = ± 1. Unconditionality is an important property since it allows one to forget about the order of summation. A Schauder basis is symmetric if it is unconditional and uniformly equivalent to all its permutations: there exists a constant C such that for every integer n, every permutation π of the integers {0, 1, …, n} , all scalar coefficients {αk} and all signs {εk},

$\Bigl\| \sum_{k=0}^n \varepsilon_k \alpha_k b_{\pi(k)} \Bigr\|_V \le C \Bigl\| \sum_{k=0}^n \alpha_k b_k \Bigr\|_V.$

The standard bases of the sequence spaces c0 and ℓp for 1 ≤ p < ∞, as well as every orthonormal basis in a Hilbert space, are unconditional. These bases are also symmetric.

The trigonometric system is not an unconditional basis in Lp, except for p = 2.

The Haar system is an unconditional basis in Lp for any 1 < p < ∞. The space L1([0, 1]) has no unconditional basis.[18]

A natural question is whether every infinite-dimensional Banach space has an infinite-dimensional subspace with an unconditional basis. This was solved negatively by Timothy Gowers and Bernard Maurey in 1992.[19]

## Schauder bases and duality

A basis {en}n≥0 of a Banach space X is boundedly complete if for every sequence {an}n≥0 of scalars such that the partial sums

$V_n = \sum_{k=0}^n a_k e_k$

are bounded in X, the sequence {Vn} converges in X. The unit vector basis for ℓp, 1 ≤ p < ∞, is boundedly complete. However, the unit vector basis is not boundedly complete in c0. Indeed, if an = 1 for every n, then

$\|V_n\|_{c_0} = \max_{0 \le k \le n} |a_k| = 1$

for every n, but the sequence {Vn} is not convergent in c0, since ||Vn+1Vn|| = 1 for every n.

A space X with a boundedly complete basis {en}n≥0 is isomorphic to a dual space, namely, the space X is isomorphic to the dual of the closed linear span in the dual X ′ of the biorthogonal functionals associated to the basis {en}.[20]

A basis {en}n≥0 of X is shrinking if for every bounded linear functional f on X, the sequence of non-negative numbers

$\varphi_n = \sup \{|f(x)| : x \in F_n, \; \|x\| \le 1 \}$

tends to 0 when n → ∞, where Fn is the linear span of the basis vectors em for mn. The unit vector basis for ℓp, 1 < p < ∞, or for c0, is shrinking. It is not shrinking in ℓ1: if f is the bounded linear functional on ℓ1 given by

$f : x = \{x_n\} \in \ell^1 \ \rightarrow \ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x_n,$

then φnf(en) = 1 for every n.

A basis {en}n ≥ 0 of X is shrinking if and only if the biorthogonal functionals {e*n}n ≥ 0 form a basis of the dual X ′.[21]

Robert C. James characterized reflexivity in Banach spaces with basis: the space X with a Schauder basis is reflexive if and only if the basis is both shrinking and boundedly complete.[22] James also proved that a space with an unconditional basis is non-reflexive if and only if it contains a subspace isomorphic to c0 or ℓ1.[23]

## Related concepts

A Hamel basis is a subset B of a vector space V such that every element v ∈ V can uniquely be written as

$v = \sum_{b \in B} \alpha_b b$

with αbF, with the extra condition that the set

$\{ b \in B \mid \alpha_b \neq 0 \}$

is finite. This property makes the Hamel basis unwieldy for infinite-dimensional Banach spaces; as a Hamel basis for an infinite-dimensional Banach space has to be uncountable. (Every finite-dimensional subspace of an infinite-dimensional Banach space X has empty interior, and is no-where dense in X. It then follows from the Baire category theorem that a countable union of these finite-dimensional subspaces cannot serve as a basis.[24])

## Notes

1. ^ see Schauder (1927).
2. ^ a b Schauder, Juliusz (1928), "Eine Eigenschaft des Haarschen Orthogonalsystems", Mathematische Zeitschrift 28: 317–320.
3. ^ a b Faber, Georg (1910), "Über die Orthogonalfunktionen des Herrn Haar", Deutsche Math.-Ver (in German) 19: 104–112. ISSN 0012-0456; http://www-gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/cgi-bin/digbib.cgi?PPN37721857X ; http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?GDZPPN002122553
4. ^ for an early published proof, see p. 157, C.3 in Bessaga, C. and Pełczyński, A. (1958), "On bases and unconditional convergence of series in Banach spaces", Studia Math. 17: 151–164. In the first lines of this article, Bessaga and Pełczyński write that Mazur's result appears without proof in Banach's book —to be precise, on p. 238— but they do not provide a reference containing a proof.
5. ^ Enflo, Per (July 1973). "A counterexample to the approximation problem in Banach spaces". Acta Mathematica 130 (1): 309–317. doi:10.1007/BF02392270.
6. ^ see pp. 48–49 in Schauder (1927). Schauder defines there a general model for this system, of which the Faber–Schauder system used today is a special case.
7. ^ see Bočkarev, S. V. (1974), "Existence of a basis in the space of functions analytic in the disc, and some properties of Franklin's system", (in Russian) Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 95(137): 3–18, 159. Translated in Math. USSR-Sb. 24 (1974), 1–16. The question is in Banach's book, Banach (1932) p. 238, §3.
8. ^ See p. 161, III.D.20 in Wojtaszczyk (1991).
9. ^ See p. 192, III.E.17 in Wojtaszczyk (1991).
10. ^ Franklin, Philip (1928), "A set of continuous orthogonal functions", Math. Ann. 100: 522–529.
11. ^ see p. 164, III.D.26 in Wojtaszczyk (1991).
12. ^ see Ciesielski, Z. (1969), "A construction of basis in C1(I2)", Studia Math. 33: 243–247, and Schonefeld, Steven (1969), "Schauder bases in spaces of differentiable functions", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 75: 586–590.
13. ^ see p. 238, §3 in Banach (1932).
14. ^ see p. 40, II.B.11 in Wojtaszczyk (1991).
15. ^ a b see Proposition 4.25, p. 88 in Ryan (2002).
16. ^ see Corollary 4.13, p. 80 in Ryan (2002).
17. ^ see Szankowski, Andrzej (1981), "B(H) does not have the approximation property", Acta Math. 147: 89–108.
18. ^ see p. 24 in Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977).
19. ^ Gowers, W. Timothy; Maurey, Bernard (6 May 1992). "The unconditional basic sequence problem". arXiv:math/9205204.
20. ^ see p. 9 in Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977).
21. ^ see p. 8 in Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977).
22. ^ see James, Robert. C. (1950), "Bases and reflexivity of Banach spaces", Ann. of Math. (2) 52: 518–527. See also Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977) p. 9.
23. ^ see James, Robert C. (1950), "Bases and reflexivity of Banach spaces", Ann. of Math. (2) 52: 518–527. See also p. 23 in Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977).
24. ^ Carothers, N. L. (2005), A short course on Banach space theory, Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-60372-2