Schmerber v. California
||This article needs attention from an expert in Law. (March 2015)|
|Schmerber v. California|
|Argued April 25, 1966
Decided June 20, 1966
|Full case name||Armando Schmerber, Petitioner v. State of California|
|Citations||384 U.S. 757 (more)
86 S.Ct. 1826; 16 L.Ed.2d 908; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1129
|Prior history||Certiorari to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles|
|(1) Blood tests do not implicate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; thus, the Sixth Amendment does not require an opportunity to consult with counsel first
(2) Warrantless blood tests to determine blood alcohol content of drunk driving suspects are justified under the exigent circumstances doctrine of the Fourth Amendment
|Plurality||Brennan, joined by Clark, White|
|Concurrence||Harlan, joined by Stewart|
|Dissent||Black, joined by Douglas|
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that a State may, over the suspect's protest, have a physician extract blood from a person suspected of drunken driving without violating the suspect's rights under the Fourth or Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Armando Schmerber was hospitalized following an accident involving an automobile which he had apparently been driving. A police officer smelled liquor on his breath and noticed other symptoms of drunkenness at the accident scene and at the hospital, placed Schmerber under arrest, and informed him of his Miranda rights.
At the officer's direction a physician took a blood sample. Schmerber objected despite the advice of his counsel to consent thereto. A report of the chemical analysis of the blood, which indicated intoxication, was admitted in evidence over objection at Schmerber's trial for driving while intoxicated. He was convicted and the conviction was affirmed by the appellate court which rejected his claims of denial of due process, of his privilege against self-incrimination, of his right to counsel, and of his right not to be subjected to unreasonable searches and seizures.
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 384
- Missouri v. McNeely (2013)
- Winston v. Lee (1985)
- Rochin v. California (1952)
- Green, S. (1967). "Forcible Administration of Blood Tests: Schmerber v. California". UCLA Law Review 14: 680. ISSN 0041-5650.
- Willmore, Wendell J. (1967). "The Implications of Schmerber v. California". Air Force Law Review 9: 26. ISSN 0094-8381.