Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine  
Abbreviated title (ISO 4)
Sci. Rev. Alternative Med.
Discipline Alternative medicine
Language English
Edited by Wallace Sampson
Publication details
Publisher
Commission for Scientific Medicine and Mental Health (United States)
Publication history
1997-2007
Yes
Indexing
ISSN 1095-0656
LCCN 98642211
OCLC no. 37478842
Links

Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine (SRAM) is a peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Commission for Scientific Medicine and Mental Health.[1] SRAM was established by Wallace Sampson (Stanford University) and Paul Kurtz (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal).[2] It claimed to be "the only peer-reviewed journal devoted exclusively to objectively analyzing the claims of 'alternative medicine.'"[3]

The SRAM website states:

The purpose of the Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine is to apply the best tools of science and reason to determine whether hypotheses are valid and treatments are effective. It will reject no claims because it fits, or fails to fit, some paradigm. It will simply seek justified answers to two questions: "Is it true?" and "Does this treatment work?"

A statement "In Defence of Scientific Medicine," welcoming the founding of SRAM, was signed by a long list of notable individuals, including five Nobel laureates. The statement expressed skepticism towards alternative medicine and the need for "objective, scientific critiques" of the field.[4] The journal was also welcomed by Science when it launched.[5]

SRAM was evaluated at least three times by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) for Medline/PubMed indexing, but rejected each time. In an editorial published on the journal's site, Sampson says that NLM director Donald Lindberg revealed that the first review of SRAM had been performed by fourteen individuals or organizations who support alternative medicine. Sampson contends that, because SRAM critically examines alternative medicine, such a panel of reviewers would not be able to objectively consider the journal. According to Sampson, the only information he received regarding the third review was that it was conducted by NIH independent reviewers. Sampson states, "This was not what we had in mind when requesting outside review, as there was no assurance that the reviewers were either objective or authorities in pseudoscience."[6]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Commission for Scientific Medicine and Mental Health
  2. ^ "Journal Casts a Cold Eye On Alternative Medicine", New York Times, 30 December 1997
  3. ^ "Journal Welcome Page". (Wayback Machine archive). Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. Retrieved 3 June 2012. 
  4. ^ Signers of the statement "In Defence of Scientific Medicine"
  5. ^ "New Alternative Medicine Watchdog". Science 278 (5338): 581c. 1997. doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.581c. 
  6. ^ Sampson, Wallace. "SRAM Editorial". (Wayback Machine archive). Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. Retrieved 24 May 2012. 

External links[edit]