Science journalism
| This article may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. You can help. The discussion page may contain suggestions. (August 2011) |
Science journalism conveys reporting about science to the public. The field typically involves interactions between scientists, journalists and the public, and is still evolving.
Contents |
[edit] Aim of science journalism
Science values detail, precision, the impersonal, the technical, the lasting, facts, numbers and being right. Journalism values brevity, approximation, the personal, the colloquial, the immediate, stories, words and being right now. There are going to be tensions.—Quentin Cooper, of BBC Radio 4’s Material World, [1]
The first task of a science journalist is to render the very detailed, specific, and often jargon-laden information produced by scientists into a form that the average media consumer can understand and appreciate, while still communicating the information accurately.
Science journalists often do not have training in the scientific disciplines that they cover. Some have earned a degree in a scientific field before becoming journalists, or exhibited talent in writing about science subjects. However, good preparation for interviews and even deceptively simple questions such as "What does this mean to the people on the street?" can often give material that is useful for publication for the intended audience.
[edit] Status of science journalism
With budget cuts at major newspapers and other media, there are fewer working science journalists than before. Blog-based science reporting is filling in to some degree, but has problems of its own. [2]
[edit] Criticism
Science journalists regularly come under criticism for falsely reporting scientific stories. Very often, such as with climate change, this leaves the public with the impression that disagreement within the scientific community is much greater than it actually is.[3] Science is based on experimental evidence, testing and not dogma, and disputation is a normal activity.[4]
[edit] See also
- Popular science
- Public awareness of science
- Scientific literature
- Frontiers of Science
- Science by press conference
- False balance
[edit] References
- ^ Science and the media – an uncomfortable fit By Sallie Robbins
- ^ "Unpopular Science", by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum, The Nation, Aug. 17, 2009
- ^ http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf
- ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/badscience
[edit] External links
- Indian Science Communication Society
- European Union of Science Journalists' Associations
- National Association of Science Writers (USA)
- Northwest Science Writers Association (Pacific Northwest, USA)
- Association of British Science Writers
- Canadian Science Writers' Association
- Arab Science Journalists Association
- Union of Italian Science Journalists (UGIS, Unione Giornalisti Italiani Scientifici)
- World Federation of Science Journalists
- SWIM - Science Writers in Italy
- TELI - German Science Writers
- Knight Science Journalism Tracker at MIT, "Peer review within science journalism"