Second anointing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In the Latter Day Saint movement, the second anointing, is an alleged ordinance which is suggested to occur and be conducted in Latter Day Saint temples. While no church doctrine, either current or historical, makes any statement that this practice has ever existed, at least two former Mormon bloggers have speculated that founder Joseph Smith, Jr.'s reference to the "fullness of the priesthood" indicates that there was a lesser-known ordination which occurs in temples and that this ordination is a "second annointing", and [1] that through this second anointing one can have their "calling and election" made sure", and their celestial marriage "sealed by the holy spirit of promise".[2] Latter-Day Saint scripture, Historical Church documents, and Religious historians indicate this having one's "calling and election made sure" is obtainable in this life, it is not granted by man, but rather over time through the spirit, and by merit of faith, righteousness, receiving other ordinances, and keeping them. Despite this speculation, historic church documents and teaching manuals state that the "fullness of the priesthood" is not a reference to this alleged ordinance.

More recently, rumors of such an ordinance have been promulgated by two disaffected members of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - John Dehlin and Tom Philips. According to their blogs, the ceremony was performed for nominated couples from the 1840s to at least the mid-1900s. Any actual information that the practice ever actually existed or is still in use, has not been established. Though similar ordinances may have at some point performed by many Mormon fundamentalist groups, it does clearly appear that it is not performed by some denominations which otherwise share very many similarities with Latter-day Saint temple ordinances, such as the Community of Christ.

Proposed History[edit]

As Joseph Smith, Jr. introduced the Nauvoo Endowment in 1842, he came to understand that his work in establishing the "fullness of the priesthood" was not yet complete.[3] In August 1843, church leader Brigham Young stated that "[i]f any in the Church had the fullness of the priesthood, he did not know it", nevertheless, Young understood that the "fullness of the priesthood" involved an anointing as "king and priest", with the actual kingdom to be given after resurrection.[4]

As reported by Buerger, the initial second anointing is guessed to have taken place on September 28, 1843, when Joseph and his wife Emma Smith received it.[5] During Smith's lifetime, the second anointing was given to at least 20 men and 17 women.[6]:22–23 After Smith was murdered by a mob in June 1844, Brigham Young was eventually selected as prophet of the LDS Church, and in January 1846, he began administering the second anointing in the nearly-completed Nauvoo Temple. Young re-administered the ordinance to many of those who had received it under Joseph Smith, and he delegated his authority to others, who performed nearly 600 second anointings (some to polygamous unions) before the temple was closed on February 7, 1846.[6]:26

After migration to Utah, the LDS Church did not conduct further second anointings until late 1866.[7] Beginning in the 1870s, second anointings were performed vicariously.[6]:30 In the 1880s, then President of the Church John Taylor was concerned that too many second anointings were being performed, and he instituted a series of procedural safeguards, requiring recommendation by a stake president, and a guideline that the ordinance "belonged particularly to old men".[6]:32–33 In 1901, President Lorenzo Snow further limited accessibility to the ordinance by outlining stringent criteria for worthiness.[6]:33–34

It is somehow guessed that by 1918 over 14,000 second anointings had been performed for the living and the dead [6]:39 then during the 1920s, the frequency of second anointings was dramatically reduced. Stake presidents were no longer allowed to recommend candidates for the ordinance, that privilege falling only to members of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles.[6]:39–40 By 1941, just under 15,000 second anointings had been performed for the living, and just over 6,000 for the dead.[6]:41 The church has not allowed historians to have access to second anointing records subsequent to 1941; therefore, the current frequency of anointings is obscure. However, it is known that in 1942, 13 of the church's 32 General Authorities had not received the second anointing.[6]:41 By 1949, the practice had been comparatively "practically discontinued" by the LDS Church, though in 1981 it continued "to be performed--albeit on a small scale".[8]


According to 19th-century journal entries, the second anointing ceremony consisted of two parts. The first part consisted of a washing and anointing of the bodies of the participants by an officiator. The second part took place some time later, and was conducted without an officiator in a private ceremony between a married couple, in which the wife symbolically prepared her husband for his death and resurrection.[6]:26–27

Meaning and symbolism[edit]

The "first anointing" allegedly refers to the washing and anointing part of the Endowment ceremony, in which a person is anointed to become a king and priest or a queen and priestess unto God. The man who suggested the idea of second anointing states that participants are then anointed as a king and priest, or queen and priestess. When the anointing is given, according to Brigham Young, the participant "will then have received the fulness of the Priesthood, all that can be given on earth."[9]

Supposedly the second anointing differs from the "first anointing" (part of the Endowment ceremony) in that, the first anointing promises blessings in the afterlife contingent on the patron's faithfulness, the Second Anointing actually bestows those blessings. According to prominent 20th-century Latter-day Saint Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, those who have their calling and election made sure "receive the more sure word of prophecy, which means that the Lord seals their exaltation upon them while they are yet in this life. ... [T]heir exaltation is assured." [10]

The second anointing may or may not have been intended to symbolize or to literally fulfill scriptural references to the fulness of the priesthood such as in the Doctrine and Covenants, Doctrine and Covenants 124:28, a revelation by Joseph Smith, Jr. commanding the building of a temple in Nauvoo, Illinois, in part, because "there is not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost unto you, or which he hath taken away, even the fulness of the priesthood." (emphasis added). LDS Church leaders often connect this ordinance with a statement by Peter in his second Epistle. In 2 Peter 1:10, he talks about making one's "calling and election sure," and further remarks, "We have also a more sure word of prophecy" (2 Peter 1:19). Joseph Smith, Jr. referenced this process in saying, "When the Lord has thoroughly proved [a person], and finds that the [person] is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the [person] will find his[/her] calling and election made sure".[11][12]

Some People have guessed that because of this women who receive the second anointing, in which they are anointed queens and priestesses, are ordained to the "fulness of the priesthood" the same as their husbands. These people think that Joseph Smith may have considered these women to have, in fact, received the power of the priesthood (though if this were the case there is still no information suggesting a particular office in the priesthood, meaning the holder would not have the keys to perform any ordinance or known function of the priesthood).[13]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Doctrine and Covenants 124:28
  2. ^ Flake 1992 (defining "holy spirit of promise").
  3. ^ History of the Church, 5:139-40 (Aug. 31, 1842), speaking to the Relief Society.
  4. ^ Journal of Wilford Woodruff, Aug. 6, 1843; also in History of the Church, 5:527.[full citation needed]
  5. ^ Diary of Joseph Smith, 28 Sept. 1843; Wilford Woodruff, Historian's Private Journal (1858), p. 24 (LDS Archives).[full citation needed]
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Buerger 1983
  7. ^ Journal of Wilford Woodruff, December 30, 31, 1866.[full citation needed]
  8. ^ Buerger 1983, p. 41, citing a letter by apostle George F. Richards, who was attempting to revive the practice.
  9. ^ Journal of Heber C. Kimball, 26 Dec. 1845 (quoting Brigham Young).[full citation needed]
  10. ^ McConkie 1966, pp. 109–110
  11. ^ Smith 1976, p. 150
  12. ^ Doxey 1992, p. 248
  13. ^ Quinn 1992, p. [page needed]