||This article needs attention from an expert in Physics. (November 2008)|
The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic solar system tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by the slowing passage of light as it moves over a finite distance through a change in gravitational potential. In an article entitled Fourth Test of General Relativity, Shapiro wrote 
Because, according to the general theory, the speed of a light wave depends on the strength of the gravitational potential along its path, these time delays should thereby be increased by almost 2x10−4 sec when the radar pulses pass near the sun. Such a change, equivalent to 60 km in distance, could now be measured over the required path length to within about 5 to 10% with presently obtainable equipment.
Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculated the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations.
The time delay effect was first observed in 1964, by Irwin Shapiro. Shapiro proposed an observational test of his prediction: bounce radar beams off the surface of Venus and Mercury, and measure the round trip travel time. When the Earth, Sun, and Venus are most favorably aligned, Shapiro showed that the expected time delay, due to the presence of the Sun, of a radar signal traveling from the Earth to Venus and back, would be about 200 microseconds, well within the limitations of 1960s era technology.
The first tests, performed in 1966 and 1967 using the MIT Haystack radar antenna, were successful, matching the predicted amount of time delay. The experiments have been repeated many times since then, with increasing accuracy.
Calculating time delay
In a near-static gravitational field of moderate strength (say, of stars and planets, but not one of a black hole or close binary system of neutron stars) the effect may be considered as a special case of gravitational time dilation.The measured elapsed time of a light signal in a gravitational field is longer than it would be without the field, and for moderate strength near-static fields the difference is directly proportional to the classical gravitational potential, precisely as given by standard gravitational time dilation formulas.
Time delay due to light traveling around a single mass
For a signal going around a massive object, the time delay can be calculated as the following:
Using Δx = cΔt, this formula can also be written as
which is the extra distance the light has to travel. Here is the Schwarzschild radius.
In PPN parameters,
which is twice the Newtonian prediction (with ).
Shapiro delay of neutrinos and gravitational waves
From the near-simultaneous observations of neutrinos and photons from SN 1987A, the Shapiro delay for high-energy neutrinos must be the same as that for photons to within 10%, consistent with recent estimates of the neutrino mass which imply that those neutrinos were moving at very close to the speed of light. Since gravitational waves have not been directly detected, there is no data on the Shapiro delay for gravitational waves. In general relativity and other metric theories of gravity, though, the Shapiro delay for gravitational waves is expected to be the same as that for light and neutrinos. However, in theories such as tensor-vector-scalar gravity and other modified GR theories which reproduce Milgrom's law and avoid the need for dark matter, the Shapiro delay for gravitational waves is much smaller than that for neutrinos or photons.
- Irwin I. Shapiro (1964). "Fourth Test of General Relativity". Physical Review Letters 13 (26): 789–791. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..789S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789.
- Irwin I. Shapiro; Gordon H. Pettengill; Michael E. Ash; Melvin L. Stone et al. (1968). "Fourth Test of General Relativity: Preliminary Results". Physical Review Letters 20 (22): 1265–1269. Bibcode:1968PhRvL..20.1265S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1265.
- Elena V. Pitjeva:Tests of General Relativity from observations of planets and spacecraft - (slides undated)
- van Straten W; Bailes M; Britton M et al. (12 July 2001). "Boost for General Relativity". Nature 412 (6843): 158–60. doi:10.1038/35084015. PMID 11449265.
- d'Inverno, Ray (1992). Introducing Einstein's Relativity. Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-859686-3. See Section 15.6 for an excellent advanced undergraduate level introduction to the Shapiro effect.
- Will, Clifford M. (2014). "The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment". Living Reviews in Relativity 17: 4–107. arXiv:1403.7377. Bibcode:2014LRR....17....4W. doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4. A graduate level survey of the solar system tests, and more.
- John C. Baez; Emory F. Bunn (2005). "The Meaning of Einstein's Equation". American Journal of Physics 73 (7): 644–652. arXiv:gr-qc/0103044. Bibcode:2005AmJPh..73..644B. doi:10.1119/1.1852541.
- Michael J. Longo (January 18, 1988). "New Precision Tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle from Sn1987a". Physical Review Letters 60 (3): 173–175. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..60..173L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.173.
- Lawrence M. Krauss; Scott Tremaine (January 18, 1988). "Test of the Weak Equivalence Principle for Neutrinos and Photons". Physical Review Letters 60 (3): 176–177. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..60..176K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.176.
- S. Desai; E. Kahya; R.P. Woodard (2008). "Reduced time delay for gravitational waves with dark matter emulators". Physical Review D 77 (12): 124041. arXiv:0804.3804. Bibcode:2008PhRvD..77l4041D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.124041.