Shifted Gompertz distribution
| Probability density function |
|
| Cumulative distribution function |
|
| Parameters | b > 0 scale (real) η > 0 shape (real) |
|---|---|
| Support | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| CDF | ![]() |
| Mean |
where |
| Mode | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Variance |
where |
The shifted Gompertz distribution is the distribution of the largest of two independent random variables one of which has an exponential distribution with parameter b and the other has a Gumbel distribution with parameters η and b. In its original formulation the distribution was expressed referring to the Gompertz distribution instead of the Gumbel distribution but, since the Gompertz distribution is a reverted Gumbel distribution (truncated at zero), the labelling can be considered as accurate. It has been used as a model of adoption of innovations. It was proposed by Bemmaor (1994).
Contents |
[edit] Specification
[edit] Probability density function
The probability density function of the shifted Gompertz distribution is:
where b > 0 is the scale parameter and η > 0 is the shape parameter of the shifted Gompertz distribution.
[edit] Cumulative distribution function
The cumulative distribution function of the shifted Gompertz distribution is:
[edit] Properties
The shifted Gompertz distribution is right-skewed for all values of η. It is more flexible than the Gumbel distribution.
[edit] Shapes
The shifted Gompertz density function can take on different shapes depending on the values of the shape parameter η:
the probability density function has its mode at 0.
the probability density function has its mode at
-
- where
is the smallest root of
- which is
[edit] Related distributions
If η varies according to a gamma distribution with shape parameter α and scale parameter β (mean = αβ), the distribution of x is Gamma/Shifted Gompertz (G/SG). When α is equal to one, the G/SG reduces to the Bass model.
[edit] See also
- Gumbel distribution
- Generalized extreme value distribution
- Mixture model
- Bass model
- Gompertz distribution
[edit] References
- Bemmaor, Albert C. (1994). "Modeling the Diffusion of New Durable Goods: Word-of-Mouth Effect Versus Consumer Heterogeneity". In G. Laurent, G.L. Lilien & B. Pras. Research Traditions in Marketing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 201–223. ISBN 0792393880.
- Chandrasekaran, Deepa; Tellis, Gerard J. (2007). "A Critical Review of Marketing Research on Diffusion of New Products". In Naresh K. Malhotra. Review of Marketing Research. 3. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. pp. 39–80. ISBN 978-0-7656-1306-6.
- Jimenez, Fernando; Jodra, Pedro (2009). "A Note on the Moments and Computer Generation of the Shifted Gompertz Distribution". Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 38 (1): 78–89. doi:10.1080/03610920802155502.
- Van den Bulte, Christophe; Stremersch, Stefan (2004). "Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test". Marketing Science 23 (4): 530–544. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0054.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

![b e^{-bx} e^{-\eta e^{-bx}}\left[1 + \eta\left(1 - e^{-bx}\right)\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/4/e/f/4efe11d1016f67a67761bf1697fb5a9b.png)

and ![\begin{align}\mathrm{E}[\ln(X)] =& [1 {+} 1 / \eta]\!\!\int_0^\eta \!\!\!\! e^{-X}[\ln(X)]dX\\ &- 1/\eta\!\! \int_0^\eta \!\!\!\! X e^{-X}[\ln(X)] dX \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/a/9/1/a9194919db20d1b6fc6385e35ca9b907.png)


![\text{ where, }z^\star = [3 + \eta - (\eta^2 + 2\eta + 5)^{1/2}]/(2\eta)](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/c/e/d/cede506a84388a7e3b36769ec527c364.png)
![\begin{align}\mathrm{E}\{[\ln(X)]^2\} =& [1 {+} 1 / \eta]\!\!\int_0^\eta \!\!\!\! e^{-X}[\ln(X)]^2 dX\\ &- 1/\eta \!\!\int_0^\eta \!\!\!\! X e^{-X}[\ln(X)]^2 dX \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/a/e/0/ae0c3a36593ebf4a23836ecbf71d194d.png)
![f(x;b,\eta) = b e^{-bx} e^{-\eta e^{-bx}}\left[1 + \eta\left(1 - e^{-bx}\right)\right] \text{ for }x \geq 0. \,](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/3/4/6/346d645e1451a1f8b8037064d6a24ba5.png)

the probability density function has its mode at 0.
the probability density function has its mode at
is the smallest root of

![z^\star = [3 + \eta - (\eta^2 + 2\eta + 5)^{1/2}]/(2\eta).](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/6/c/7/6c7cbd9304392dbc1aa42d55b99dd33b.png)