Shinbutsu-shūgō (神仏習合 lit. "syncretism of kami and buddhas"?), also called Shinbutsu-konkō (神仏混淆 lit. jumbling up or contamination of kami and buddhas?), a term which however has a negative connotation of bastardization and randomness, is the syncretism of Buddhism and kami worship which was Japan's religion until the Meiji period. When Buddhism was introduced through China in the late Asuka period (6th century), rather than discard the old belief system the Japanese tried to reconcile it with the new, assuming both were true. As a consequence, Buddhist temples (寺, tera) were attached to local kami shrines (神社, jinja) and vice versa and devoted to both kami and Buddha. The local religion and foreign Buddhism never quite fused, but remained however inextricably linked all the way to the present day, always interacting. The depth of the resulting influence of Buddhism on local religious beliefs can be seen for example in the fact that much of Shinto's conceptual vocabulary and even the types of Shinto shrines today, with a large worship hall and religious images, are themselves of Buddhist origin. The formal separation of Buddhism from Shinto took place only as recently as the end of the 19th century, and in many ways the blending of the two still continues.
The term shinbutsu shūgō itself was coined during the early modern era (17th century) to refer to the amalgamation of kami and buddhas in general, as opposed to specific currents within Buddhism which did the same, e.g. Ryōbu Shintō and Sannō Shintō.
Assimilation of Buddhism
Debate over the nature of Shinto
There is no agreement among specialists as to the exact extent of fusion between the two religions.
According to some scholars, for example Hirai Naofusa in Japan and Joseph Kitagawa in the US, Shinto is the indigenous religion of Japan, has existed as such continuously since pre-history, and consists of all the peculiarly Japanese rituals and beliefs shaped by Japanese history from prehistory to the present. The term "Shinto" itself was coined in the 6th century to differentiate the loosely organized local religion from imported Buddhism.
The opposing view belongs to Japanese historian Toshio Kuroda (and his supporters) who, in a famous article ("Shinto in the History of Japanese Religion," published in English in 1981), has argued that Shinto as an independent religion was born only in the modern period after emerging in the Middle Ages as an offshoot of Buddhism. Kuroda's main argument is that Shinto as a distinct religion is a Meiji era invention of Japanese nationalist ideologues (see the section The two religions after the Separation Order below). He points out how the state formalization of kami rituals and the state ranking of shrines during the Heian period were not the emergence of Shinto as an independent religion, but an effort to explain local beliefs in Buddhist terms. He also says that, while it is true that the two characters for "Shinto" appear very early in the historical record, for example in the Nihon Shoki, this does not mean today's Shinto already existed as a religion because they were originally used as a name for Taoism or even for religion in general. Indeed, according to Kuroda many features of Shinto, for example the worshiping of mirrors and swords or the very structure of Ise Shrine (Shinto's holiest and most important site) are typical of Taoism. The term Shinto in old texts therefore does not necessarily indicate something uniquely Japanese.
Still according to this view, Shinto's rise as an autonomous religion was gradual and started to become evident already with Yoshida Kanetomo's Yoshida Shinto. The term Shinto started to be used with today's meaning of kami worship only later during the Edo Period. During the same era, Kokugaku theorists like Motoori Norinaga tried to separate it intellectually from Buddhism, preparing the ground from the final schism of the Meiji restoration.
According to the first view, then, the two religions were at the time of their first meeting already formed and independent and thereafter just coexisted with non-essential exchanges. According to the second, Buddhism, meeting local kami beliefs in Japan, actually produced today's Shinto.
The fusion of Buddhism with the local kami worship started as soon as the first arrived in Japan, as proven by Mononobe no Okoshi's statement that:
"The kami of our land will be offended if we worship a foreign kami".
In other words, Mononobe saw Buddha as just another kami, and not as an alien God, possibly different in nature from his own. Foreign kami were called banshin (蕃神 "barbarian gods"?) or busshin (仏神 "Buddhist gods"?), and understood to be more or less like local ones. Initially, therefore, the conflict between the two religions was political, and not religious, in nature, a struggle between the progressive Soga clan, that wanted a more international outlook for the country, and the conservative Mononobe clan, that wanted the contrary.
Buddhism was not passive in the assimilation process, but was itself ready to assimilate and be assimilated. By the time it entered Japan it was already syncretic, having adapted to and amalgamated with other religions and cultures in India, China, and the Korean peninsula. For example, already while in India, it had absorbed Hindu divinities like Brahma (Bonten in Japanese) and Indra (Taishakuten). When it arrived in Japan, it already had a disposition towards producing the combinatory gods that the Japanese would call shūgōshin (習合神 syncretic gods?). Searching for the origins of a kami in Buddhist scriptures was felt to be nothing out of the ordinary.
However, if monks didn't doubt the existence of kami, they certainly saw them as inferior to their Buddhas. Hindu gods had already been treated analogously: they had been thought of as un-illuminated and prisoner of saṃsāra. Buddhist claims of superiority encountered resistance, and monks tried to overcome them by deliberately integrating kami in their system. Several strategies to do this were developed and deployed.
The process of amalgamation is usually divided in three stages.
The first articulation of the difference between Japanese religious ideas and Buddhism, and the first effort to reconcile the two is attributed to Prince Shōtoku (574 - 622), and the first signs that the differences between the two world views were beginning to become manifest to the Japanese in general appear at the time of Emperor Temmu (673 - 86). Accordingly, one of the first efforts to reconcile Shinto and Buddhism was made in the 8th century during the Nara period founding so-called jingū-ji (神宮寺?), that is shrine-temples, complexes comprising both a shrine and a temple.
Behind the inclusion in a Shinto shrine of Buddhist religious objects was the idea that the kami were lost beings in need of liberation through the power of Buddha. Kami were thought to be subject to karma and reincarnation like human beings, and early Buddhist stories tell how that the task of helping suffering kami was assumed by wandering monks. A local kami would appear in a dream to the monk, telling him about his suffering. To improve the kami's karma through rites and the reading of sutras, the monk would build a temple next to the kami's shrine. Such groupings were created already in the 7th century, for example in Usa, Kyūshū, where kami Hachiman was worshiped together with Miroku Bosatsu (Maitreya). The building of temples at shrines produced shrine-temple complexes, which in turn accelerated the amalgamation process. As a result of the creation of shrine-temple complexes, many shrines that had until then been just an open-air site became Buddhist style groupings of buildings.
At the end of the same century, in what is considered the second stage of the amalgamation, the kami Hachiman was declared to be protector-deity of the Dharma and a little bit later a bodhisattva. Shrines for him started to be built at temples (the so-called temple-shrines), marking an important step ahead in the process of amalgamation of kami and Buddhism. When the great Buddha at Tōdai-ji in Nara was built, within the temple grounds was also erected a shrine for Hachiman, according to the legend because of a wish expressed by the kami himself. Hachiman considered this his reward for having helped the temple find the gold and copper mines from which the metal for the great statue had come. After this, temples in the entire country adopted tutelary kami(chinju (鎮守/鎮主?).
Honji suijaku theory
The third and final stage of the fusion took place in the 9th century with the development of the honji suijaku (本地垂迹?) theory according to which Japanese kami are emanations of buddhas, bodhisattvas or devas who mingle with human beings to lead them to the Buddhist Way. This theory was the keystone of the whole shinbutsu shūgō edifice and therefore the foundation of Japanese religion for many centuries. Because of it, most kami changed from potentially dangerous spirits to be improved through contact with the Buddhist law to local emanations of buddhas and bodhisattvas which possess a wisdom of their own. Buddhas and kami were now indivisible twins.
The status of kami however changed dramatically according to the sect. At one extreme one found the Shingon sect's Ryōbu Shinto thinkers, who considered kami and buddhas equivalent in power and dignity. However, not all kami were emanations of some buddha. Some, often called jitsu no kami (実神 true kami?), usually dangerous and angry, had no Buddhist counterpart. They were creatures called tengu or animals possessing magic, as the fox or the tanuki. Even these unholy and inferior "true kami" however attracted the attention of Ryōbu Shinto thinkers, which resulted in theories which declared them to be manifestations of Dainichi Nyorai and Amaterasu.
At the opposite extreme one found the Amidist Jōdo sect, which more or less renounced kami. This was however not because they did not exist, but rather because they were not the equals of the buddhas and their worship could therefore only be inferior. The mainstream between the two was sympathetic to kami, but ultimately considered them inferior.
The two religions however never fused completely and, while overlapping here and there, kept their particular identity within a difficult, largely un-systematized and tense relationship. This relationship existed, rather than between two systems, between particular kami and particular buddhas. The two were always perceived as parallel but separate entities. Besides shinbutsu shūgō there was always the other side of the coin of continued separation.
In fact, the term shinbutsu kakuri (神仏隔離 isolation of "kami" from Buddhism?) in Japanese Buddhist terminogy refers to the tendency that existed in Japan to keep some kami separate from Buddhism. While some kami were integrated in Buddhism, others (or at times even the same kami in a different context) were kept systematically away from Buddhism. This phenomenon had significant consequences for Japanese culture as a whole. It must not be confused with shinbutsu bunri ("separation of kami and buddhas") or with haibutsu kishaku ("abolish Buddhas and destroy Shākyamuni"), which are phenomenons recurrent in Japanese history and usually due to political causes. While the first assumes the acceptance of Buddhism, the second and third actually oppose it.
The practice had in any case important consequences, among them the prevention of the complete assimilation of kami practices into Buddhism. Also, the prohibition of Buddhism at the Ise and Kamo Shrines allowed them to freely develop their theories about the nature of kami.
Buddhism and Shinto after the Separation Order
In 1868 with the Shinbutsu bunri (the attempt to separate kami worship and Buddhism), temples and shrines were separated by law with the Kami and Buddhism Separation Order (神仏判然令 Shinbutsu Hanzenrei?).
However, in spite of more than a century of formal separation of the two religions, temples or shrines that do not separate them are still common, as proven for example by the existence of some important Buddhist Inari temples. Because during the Meiji period, to help the spread of Shinto, shrine-temples were destroyed while temple-shrines were tolerated, shrine-temples are rare (an extant example is Seiganto-ji), but temple-shrines are common, and most temples still have at least a small one. Prominent religious institutions in both camps still give evidence of integration of the two religions. The great Kenchō-ji temple, number one of Kamakura's great Zen temples (the Kamakura Gozan) includes two shrines. One of the islands in the right-side pond of Tsurugaoka Hachiman-gū shrine in Kamakura hosts a sub-shrine dedicated to goddess Benzaiten, a Buddhist deity. For this reason, the sub-shrine was removed in 1868 at the time of the Shinbutsu Bunri, but rebuilt in 1956. Shinto and Buddhism still have a symbiotic relationship of interdependence, particularly concerning funeral rites (entrusted to Buddhism) and weddings (usually left to Shinto or sometimes Christianity). The separation of the two religions must therefore be considered only superficial, and shinbutsu shūgō still an accepted practice.
Still, the separation of the two religions is felt to be real by the public. Scholar Karen Smyers comments:
The surprise of many of my informants regarding the existence of Buddhist Inari temples shows the success of the government's attempt to create separate conceptual categories regarding sites and certain identities, although practice remains multiple and nonexclusive.
- Teeuwen & Rambelli (2002:49)
- See for example the article Shinto architecture
- Tamura, page 21
- Sueki (2007:2)
- Inoue (2004:67-68)
- Breen and Teeuwen in Breen and Teeuwen (2000:4-5)
- Kitagawa (1987:139)
- Rambelli (2001)
- Scheid, Bernhard. "Trennung von Shinto und Buddhismus". Grundbegriffe:Shinto. University of Vienna. Retrieved 31 October 2010.
- Kuroda (1981:7)
- John Breen, Mark Teeuwen (2010). A new History of Shinto. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 221. ISBN 978-1-4051-5516-8.
- Tamura, pages 26 to 33.
- Encyclopedia of Shinto, Combinatory Kami, accessed on October 13, 2008. Quotation: ”Buddhism was already product of a complex process of adaptation and amalgamation with other belief systems in India, China, and the Korean peninsula.”
- Bernhard Scheid
- Mark Teeuwen in Breen and Teeuwen (2000:95-96)
- Satō Makoto
- Breen, Teeuwen (2010). A New History of Shinto. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-4051-5516-8.
- Scheid, Shinto im Mittelalter
- Sueki (2007:7-8)
- Rambelli and Teeuwen (2002:21-22)
- Toyokawa Inari accessed on June 6, 2008
- "Jungūji". Encyclopedia of Shinto. Retrieved 29 September 2010.
- Breen and Teeuwen in Breen and Teeuwen (2000:7)
- Kamiya (2008: 18 - 19)
- Smyers, pag. 219
- Breen, John; Mark Teeuwen, eds. (July 2000). Shinto in History: Ways of the Kami. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2363-4.
- Havens, Norman (2006). "Shinto". Nanzan Guide to Japanese Religions (First ed.). Honolulu: University of Hawaii. ISBN 978-0-8248-3002-1.
- Inoue Nobutaka, ed. (August 10, 2004). Shinto: A Short History. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-415-31913-3.
- Kamiya, Michinori (2000/08). Fukaku Aruku - Kamakura Shiseki Sansaku Vol. 1 (in Japanese). Kamakura: Kamakura Shunshūsha. ISBN 4-7740-0340-9. Check date values in:
- Kitagawa, Joseph (1987). On Understanding Japanese Religion. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-10229-0.
- Kuroda, Toshio; James Dobbins; Suzanne Gray (1981). Shinto in the History of Japanese Religion. 7, No. 1 (Journal of Japanese Studies ed.). Society for Japanese Studies. JSTOR 132163.
- Nishiyama, Shigeru. "Research on Shinto - 2. History (Middle Ages) Research". Encyclopedia of Shinto. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved 10 December 2010.
- Satō, Makoto (2006-12-09). "Shinto and Buddhism — Development of Shinbutsu Shūgō (Combinatory Religion of Kami and Buddhas)—". Retrieved 2008-05-12.
- Scheid, Bernhard (2008-04-16). "Honji suijaku: Die Angleichung von Buddhas und Kami" (in German). University of Vienna. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
- __________. "Shinto im Mittelalter" (in German). University of Vienna. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- Sueki, Fumihiko (2007). Chūsei no kami to hotoke (in Japanese). Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha. ISBN 978-4-634-54320-1.
- Tamura, Yoshiro (2000). "The Birth of the Japanese nation". Japanese Buddhism - A Cultural History (First Edition ed.). Tokyo: Kosei Publishing Company. p. 232 pages. ISBN 4-333-01684-3.
- Smyers, Karen Ann (1999). The Fox and the Jewel: Shared and Private Meanings in Contemporary Japanese Inari Worship. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0-8248-2102-5. OCLC 231775156.
- Dismantling stereotypes surrounding Japan's sacred entities by Fabio Rambelli, Japan Times, July 15, 2001 excerpted from Monumenta Nipponica, 56:2
- Mark Teeuwen and Fabio Rambelli (Editors) (Dec 27, 2002). Buddhas and Kami in Japan: Honji Suijaku as a Combinatory Paradigm. London: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 978-0-415-29747-9.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Shinbutsu Shūgō.|