Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued December 12, 1919 Decided January 26, 1920 |
||||||
| Full case name | Silverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States | |||||
| Citations | 251 U.S. 385 (more) | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| To permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Holmes | |||||
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent is known as fruit of the poisonous tree and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.
[edit] See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 251
- Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963)
[edit] Further reading
- Killian, B. J. (1982). "United States v. Crews: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree—A New Wrinkle?". Idaho Law Review 18: 151. ISSN 00191205.
[edit] External links
| Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920) (opinion full text).
| This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |