Simon Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Simon Singh

Singh speaking at TAM London in October 2009
Born 1 January 1964 (1964-01-01) (age 48)
Somerset, England
Occupation Author, TV presenter
Spouse Anita Anand
Children Hari Singh
Relatives Tom Singh (brother)
Website
SimonSingh.net

Simon Lehna Singh, MBE (born 1 January 1964) is a British author who has specialised in writing about mathematical and scientific topics in an accessible manner. His written works include Fermat's Last Theorem (in the United States titled Fermat's Enigma: The Epic Quest to Solve the World's Greatest Mathematical Problem), The Code Book (about cryptography and its history), Big Bang (about the Big Bang theory and the origins of the universe) and Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial (about complementary and alternative medicine).

He has also produced documentaries and works for television to accompany his books, is a trustee of NESTA, the National Museum of Science and Industry and co-founded the Undergraduate Ambassadors Scheme.

In 2008, Singh was unsuccessfully sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association for criticising their activities in a column in The Guardian.[1] A "furious backlash"[2] to the lawsuit resulted in the filing of formal complaints of false advertising against more than 500 individual chiropractors within one 24 hour period, with one national chiropractic organisation ordering its members to take down their websites,[3] and Nature Medicine noting that the case had gathered wide support for Singh, as well as prompting calls for the reform of English libel laws.[4] On 1 April 2010, Simon Singh won his court appeal for the right to rely on the defence of fair comment.[5] On 15 April 2010, the BCA officially withdrew its lawsuit, ending the case.[6]

Contents

[edit] Early life

Simon Singh signing a book for a fan, Brisbane May 23, 2005.

Singh's parents emigrated from the Punjab in India to Britain in 1950. He is the youngest of three brothers, his eldest brother being Tom Singh, the founder of the UK New Look chain of stores. Singh grew up in Wellington, Somerset, attending Wellington School, and went on to Imperial College London, where he studied Physics. He was active in the student union, becoming President of the Royal College of Science Union.[7] Later he completed a PhD degree in particle physics at Emmanuel College, Cambridge University and at CERN, Geneva.[8]

[edit] Career

In 1990 Singh joined the BBC's Science and Features Department, where he was a producer and director working on programmes such as Tomorrow's World and Horizon.

Singh directed his BAFTA award-winning documentary about the world's most notorious mathematical problem entitled "Fermat's Last Theorem" in 1996. The film was memorable for its opening shot of a middle-aged mathematician, Andrew Wiles holding back tears as he recalled the moment when he finally realised how to resolve the fundamental error in his proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. The documentary was originally transmitted in October 1997 as an edition of the BBC Horizon series. It was also aired in America as part of the NOVA series. The Proof, as it was re-titled, was nominated for an Emmy Award.

The story of this celebrated mathematical problem was also the subject of Singh's first book, Fermat's last theorem. In 1997, he began working on his second book, The Code Book, a history of codes and codebreaking. As well as explaining the science of codes and describing the impact of cryptography on history, the book also contends that cryptography is more important today than ever before. The Code Book has resulted in a return to television for him. He presented The Science of Secrecy, a five part series for Channel 4. The stories in the series range from the cipher that sealed the fate of Mary, Queen of Scots, to the coded Zimmermann Telegram that changed the course of the First World War. Other programmes discuss how two great 19th century geniuses raced to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphs and how modern encryption can guarantee privacy on the Internet. In October 2004, Singh published a book entitled Big Bang, which tells the history of the universe. It is told in his trademark style, by following the remarkable stories of the people who put the pieces together.

In 2003, Singh was made a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) for services to Science, Technology and Engineering in Education and Science Communication.[9] In the same year he was made Doctor of Letters (honoris causa) by Loughborough University, and in 2005 was given an honorary degree in Mathematics by Southampton University.

Currently, he is involved more in television and radio programmes, including A Further Five Numbers (BBC Radio 4, 2005).

Simon speaks at JREF TAM8 July 2010

He made headlines in 2005 when he criticised the Katie Melua song "Nine Million Bicycles" for inaccurate lyrics referring to the size of the observable universe. Singh proposed corrected lyrics, though he used the value of 13.7 billion light years; accounting for expansion of the universe, the comoving distance to the edge of the observable universe is 46.5 billion light years.[10][11] BBC Radio 4's Today programme brought Melua and Singh together in a radio studio where Melua recorded a tongue-in-cheek version of the song that had been written by Singh.[12]

In 2006, he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Design degree by the University of the West of England "in recognition of Simon Singh’s outstanding contribution to the public understanding of science, in particular in the promotion of science, engineering and mathematics in schools and in the building of links between universities and schools".[13] This was followed up by his receipt of the Kelvin Medal from the Institute of Physics in 2008, for his achievements in promoting Physics to the general public.[14] In July 2008, he was also awarded a degree of Doctor of Science (Honoris Causa) by Royal Holloway, University of London.[15] In July 2011, he was awarded another degree of Doctor of Science (Honoris Causa) by the University of Kent for services to Science.

Simon is a member of the Advisory Council for the Campaign for Science and Engineering.[16] He is the maiden winner of the Lilavati Award.[17] In February 2011 he was elected as a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry[18]

[edit] Chiropractic lawsuit and backlash

In 19 April 2008, The Guardian published Singh's column "Beware the Spinal Trap",[19][20] an article that was critical of the practice of chiropractic and which resulted in Singh being sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association (BCA). When the case was first brought against him, The Guardian supported him and funded his legal advice, as well as offering to pay the BCA's legal costs in an out-of-court settlement if Singh chose to settle.[21]

The article developed the theme of the book that Singh and Edzard Ernst had just published, Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial, and made various statements about the usefulness of chiropractic "for such problems as ear infections and infant colic":

You might think that modern chiropractors restrict themselves to treating back problems, but in fact they still possess some quite wacky ideas. The fundamentalists argue that they can cure anything. And even the more moderate chiropractors have ideas above their station. The British Chiropractic Association claims that their members can help treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying, even though there is not a jot of evidence. This organisation is the respectable face of the chiropractic profession and yet it happily promotes bogus treatments.[19]

[edit] Court case

In May 2009, Mr Justice Eady ruled in a preliminary hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice that merely using the phrase "happily promotes bogus treatments" meant that Singh was stating, as a matter of fact (rather than as a matter of personal opinion or metaphor), that the British Chiropractic Association was being consciously dishonest in promoting chiropractic for treating the children's ailments in question. Singh denied he intended any such meaning.[21]

Singh decided to appeal the ruling, which raised substantially the potential financial liability that he would face if he lost the case. Leave to appeal was granted in October 2009.[22][23]

The pre-trial hearing took place in February 2010 before three senior judges at the Royal Courts of Justice.[24] In April 2010, they allowed Singh's appeal, ruling that the high court judge had "erred in his approach".[25] The Court of Appeal overturned the previous ruling that Singh's comments were an assertion of fact and instead ruled that Singh was entitled to defend his comments as legally permissible fair comment.[26][27]

BCA withdrew their libel action shortly after this ruling, resulting in the end of the legal case.[28][29]

[edit] Outside the courtroom

Before Eady's preliminary ruling was overturned on appeal, commentators said that the ruling could set a precedent that had chilling effects on the freedom of speech to criticise alternative medicine.[30][31] An editorial in Nature commented on the case, and suggested that the BCA may be trying to suppress debate and that this use of English libel law is a burden on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by the European Convention on Human Rights.[32]

The Wall Street Journal Europe cited the case as an example of how British libel law "chills free speech", saying that:

As a consequence, the U.S. Congress is considering a bill that would make British libel judgments unenforceable in the U.S. ... Mr. Singh is unlikely to be the last victim of Britain's libel laws. Settling scientific and political disputes through lawsuits, though, runs counter the very principles that have made Western progress possible. "The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error," Bertolt Brecht wrote in The Life of Galileo. It is time British politicians restrain the law so that wisdom prevails in the land, and not errors."[33]

Simon Singh has been supported by the charity Sense About Science, which has published this button in his favour.[34]

The charity Sense About Science launched a lobbying campaign to draw attention to the case.[34] They issued a statement and began an online petition entitled "The English law of libel has no place in scientific disputes about evidence", which was signed by about 20,000 people.[35] Many press sources have covered the issue.[36]

The publicity produced by the libel action led to a "furious backlash",[2] with formal complaints of false advertising being made against more than 500 individual chiropractors within one 24-hour period,[3][37] with the number later climbing to one-quarter of all British chiropractors.[2] It also prompted the McTimoney Chiropractic Association to write in a leaked message to its members advising them to remove leaflets that make claims about whiplash and colic from their practice, to be wary of new patients and telephone inquiries, and telling their members: "If you have a website, take it down NOW." and "Finally, we strongly suggest you do NOT discuss this with others, especially patients."[2][3] One chiropractor is quoted as saying that "Suing Simon was worse than any Streisand effect and chiropractors know it and can do nothing about it."[2]

After demands that the British Chiropractic Association "engage in scientific debate over its position", the BCA produced its scientific evidence in a statement "supported by just 29 citations", which was:

"ripped apart by bloggers within 24 hours of publication, before being subjected to a further shredding in the British Medical Journal. It emerged that 10 of the papers cited had nothing to do with chiropractic treatment, and several weren't even studies. The remainder consisted of a small collection of poor-quality trials. More seriously, the BCA misled the public with a misrepresentation of one paper, a Cochrane review looking at the effectiveness of various treatments for bed-wetting..."[2]

In a new report, the General Chiropractic Council "has disowned the claims of the BCA–the same claims that lie at the centre of its libel action against Simon Singh.... Notably, the report concludes that the evidence does not support claims that chiropractic treatment is effective for childhood colic, bed-wetting, ear infections or asthma, the very claims that Singh was sued for describing as "bogus".[2]

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] References

  1. ^ Eden, R (16 August 2008). "Doctors take Simon Singh to court". The Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/2570744/Doctors-take-Simon-Singh-to-court.html. Retrieved 12 December 2008. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Martin Robbins. Furious backlash from Simon Singh libel case puts chiropractors on ropes. "One in four chiropractors in Britain are under investigation as a result of campaign by Singh supporters." The Guardian, 1 March 2010
  3. ^ a b c Lucas Laursen. "The Great Beyond: Chiropractic group advises members to 'withdraw from the battleground'". Nature.com. http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/06/chiropractic_group_advises_mem_1.html. Retrieved 20 June 2009. 
  4. ^ Willyard, C. (2009). "Lawsuit sparks calls for libel law reform". Nature Medicine 15 (723): 723. doi:10.1038/nm0709-723b. http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v15/n7/full/nm0709-723b.html. Retrieved 4 June 2011.  edit
  5. ^ "Simon Singh wins libel court battle". London: Guardian. 1 April 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/apr/01/simon-singh-wins-libel-court. Retrieved 1 April 2010. 
  6. ^ "British Chiropractic Association v Singh — BCA admits defeat". Ely Place. http://www.elyplace.com/index.aspx?p=1&articleId=208. Retrieved 15 April 2010. 
  7. ^ "The Simon Singh Interview". Imperial College London. October 1999. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/college.asp?P=2579. Retrieved 29 November 2009. 
  8. ^ Ph.D. thesis title: "Heavy flavour physics at the CERN p=p collider" Verified at [1] require subscription, eg. university subscription, to see it)
  9. ^ London Gazette: (Supplement) no. 56963. p. 22. 14 June 2003.
  10. ^ Singh, Simon (30 September 2005). "Katie Melua's bad science". London: The Guardian. http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,9828,1581826,00.html. Retrieved 12 December 2008. 
  11. ^ Lineweaver, Charles; Tamara M. Davis (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=misconceptions-about-the-2005-03&page=5. Retrieved 6 November 2008. 
  12. ^ "Listen Again". Today Programme. BBC Radio 4. 15 October 2005. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/listenagain_20051015.shtml. Retrieved 18 May 2008. 
  13. ^ "UWE awards honorary degree to Dr Simon Singh MBE". News 2006. University of the West of England. 28 November 2006. http://info.uwe.ac.uk/news/UWEnews/article.asp?item=961. Retrieved 12 December 2008. 
  14. ^ "The Kelvin Medal and Prize: 2008 Medallist". Subject Awards. Institute of Physics. http://www.iop.org/activity/awards/Subject_Awards/The_Kelvin_Medal_and_Prize/page_1787.html. Retrieved 12 December 2008. 
  15. ^ "2008 Honorary Graduates and Fellows become part of a prestigious network". Media & Events. Royal Holloway, University of London. http://www.rhul.ac.uk/messages/press/message.asp?ref_no=1738. Retrieved 12 December 2008. 
  16. ^ "Advisory Council of the Campaign for Science and Engineering". http://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/about/who/advisory.htm. Retrieved 2011-02-11. 
  17. ^ "Simon Singh wins maiden Leelavati Award". 27 September 2010. http://www.icm2010.org.in/wp-content/icmfiles/uploads/Leelavati_award_Simon_singh.pdf. 
  18. ^ "CSI announces new Fellows". http://www.csicop.org/news/press_releases/show/csi_announces_new_fellows. Retrieved 2011-08-07. 
  19. ^ a b Singh, Simon (19 April 2008). "Beware the spinal trap". London: The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 November 2008. http://svetlana14s.narod.ru/Simon_Singhs_silenced_paper.html. Retrieved 21 January 2009.  reinstated on 15 April 2010
  20. ^ Comment is Free, The Guardian
  21. ^ a b Boseley, Sarah (Thursday 14 May 2009). "Science writer accused of libel may take fight to European court". London: The Guardian (UK). http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/may/13/simon-singh-british-chiropractic-association. Retrieved 19 May 2009. 
  22. ^ Cressey, Daniel (Wednesday 14 October 2009). "Simon Singh vs the British Chiropractic Association, redux". nature.com. http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/10/simon_singh_vs_the_british_chi.html. Retrieved 14 October 2009. 
  23. ^ "News in brief: Singh wins leave to appeal". Times Higher Education. 29 October 2009. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=408852&c=1. 
  24. ^ "Judge ‘baffled’ by Simon Singh chiropractic case". Index on Censorship. 23 February 2010. http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/02/simon-singh-chiropractic-bca-libel-appeal/. Retrieved 4 June 2011. 
  25. ^ England & Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
  26. ^ Science writer wins "fair comment" libel appeal Reuters, 1 April 2010
  27. ^ Science writer Simon Singh wins libel appeal BBC news 1 April 2010
  28. ^ Pallab Ghosh (15 April 2010). "Case dropped against Simon Singh". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8621880.stm. 
  29. ^ Mark Henderson (15 April 2010). "Science writer Simon Singh wins bitter libel battle". London: Times Online. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article7098157.ece. 
  30. ^ "Chiropractic critic loses first round in libel fight". New Scientist. 15 May 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227083.000-chiropractic-critic-loses-first-round-in-libel-fight.html. Retrieved 19 May 2009. 
  31. ^ Green, David Allen (13 May 2009). "Comment: Don't criticise, or we'll sue". New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227086.200-comment-dont-criticise-or-well-sue.html. Retrieved 19 May 2009. 
  32. ^ "Unjust burdens of proof". Nature 459 (7248): 751–751. 2009. doi:10.1038/459751a. PMID 19516290.  edit
  33. ^ Salil Tripathi. Britain Chills Free Speech. The Wall Street Journal Europe, 4 June 2009
  34. ^ a b Sign up now to keep the libel laws out of science! Sense about Science
  35. ^ The campaign at a glance
  36. ^ Press Coverage
  37. ^ Lucas Laursen. "The Great Beyond: Complaints converge on chiropractors". Nature.com. http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/06/chiropractic_complainers_ident.html. Retrieved 20 June 2009. 

[edit] External links

Radio shows
Other
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages