Small set (combinatorics)
is one such that the infinite sum
- The set of all positive integers is known to be a large set (see Harmonic series), and so is the set obtained from any arithmetic sequence (i.e. of the form an + b with a ≥ 0, b ≥ 1 and n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ...) where a = 0, b = 1 give the multiset and a = 1, b = 1 give .
- The set of square numbers is small (see Basel problem). So is the set of cube numbers, the set of 4th powers, and so on. More generally, the set of values of a polynomial , k ≥ 2, ai ≥ 0 for all i ≥ 1, ak > 0. When k=1 we get an arithmetic sequence (which forms a large set.).
- The set of powers of 2 is known to be a small set, and so is the set of any geometric sequence (i.e. of the form abn with a ≥ 1, b ≥ 2 and n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ...).
- The set of prime numbers has been proven to be large. The set of twin primes has been proven to be small (see Brun's constant).
- The set of prime powers which are not prime (i.e. all pn with n ≥ 2) is a small set although the primes are a large set. This property is frequently used in analytic number theory. More generally, the set of perfect powers is small.
- The set of numbers whose decimal representations exclude 7 (or any digit one prefers) is small. That is, for example, the set
- A union of finitely many small sets is small, as the sum of two convergent series is a convergent series. A union of infinitely many small sets is either a small set (e.g. the sets of p2, p3, p4, ... where p is prime) or a large set (e.g. the sets for k > 0). Also, a large set minus a small set is still large. A large set minus a large set is either a small set (e.g. the set of all prime powers pn with n ≥ 1 minus the set of all primes) or a large set (e.g. the set of all positive integers minus the set of all positive even numbers). In set theoretic terminology, the small sets form an ideal.
- The Müntz–Szász theorem is that a set is large if and only if the set spanned by
- is dense in the uniform norm topology of continuous functions on a closed interval. This is a generalization of the Stone–Weierstrass theorem.
It is not known how to identify whether a given set is large or small in general. As a result, there are many sets which are not known to be either large or small.
Paul Erdős famously asked the question of whether any set that does not contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions must necessarily be small. He offered a prize of $3000 for the solution to this problem, more than for any of his other conjectures, and joked that this prize offer violated the minimum wage law. This question is still open.