A smoke detector is a device that senses smoke, typically as an indicator of fire. Commercial and residential security devices issue a signal to a fire alarm control panel as part of a fire alarm system, while household detectors, known as smoke alarms, generally issue a local audible or visual alarm from the detector itself.
Smoke detectors are typically housed in a disk-shaped plastic enclosure about 150 millimetres (6 in) in diameter and 25 millimetres (1 in) thick, but the shape can vary by manufacturer or product line. Most smoke detectors work either by optical detection (photoelectric) or by physical process (ionization), while others use both detection methods to increase sensitivity to smoke. Sensitive alarms can be used to detect, and thus deter, smoking in areas where it is banned such as in public restrooms and schools. Smoke detectors in large commercial, industrial, and residential buildings are usually powered by a central fire alarm system, which is powered by the building power with a battery backup. However, in many single-family detached and smaller multiple family housings, a smoke alarm is often powered only by a single disposable battery.
- 1 Design
- 2 Interconnected smoke detectors
- 3 Single station smoke detectors
- 4 Standards
- 5 History
- 6 References
- 7 External links
An optical detector is a light sensor. The components of the light sensor are the light source (incandescent bulb or Light-emitting diode), a lens, and a photoelectric receiver (typically a photodiode). In spot-type detectors, all of these components are arranged inside a smoke chamber where smoke from a nearby fire will flow. In large open areas such as atria and auditoriums, optical beam smoke detectors are used. A wall-mounted unit emits a beam of infrared or ultraviolet light which is either received and processed by a separate device or reflected back to the transmitter/receiver by a reflector.
According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), "photoelectric smoke detection is generally more responsive to fires that begin with a long period of smoldering (called smoldering fires)." Also, studies by Texas A&M and the NFPA cited by the City of Palo Alto California state, "Photoelectric alarms react slower to rapidly growing fires than ionization alarms, but laboratory and field tests have shown that photoelectric smoke alarms provide adequate warning for all types of fires and have been shown to be far less likely to be deactivated by occupants."
Although optical alarms are highly effective at detecting smoldering fires and do provide adequate protection from flaming fires, fire safety experts and the National Fire Protection Agency recommend installing what are called combination alarms, which are alarms that either detect both heat and smoke, or use both the ionization and photoelectric / optical processes. Also some combination alarms may include a carbon monoxide detection capability.
Not all optical detection methods are the same. The type and sensitivity of light source and photoelectric sensor, and type of smoke chamber differ between manufacturers.
An ionization smoke detector uses a radioisotope such as americium-241 to produce ionization in air; a difference due to smoke is detected and an alarm is generated. Ionization detectors are more sensitive to the flaming stage of fires than optical detectors, while optical detectors are more sensitive to fires in the early smouldering stage.
The radioactive isotope americium-241 in the smoke detector emits ionizing radiation in the form of alpha particles into an ionization chamber (which is open to the air) and a sealed reference chamber. The air molecules in the chamber become ionized and these ions allow the passage of a small electric current between charged electrodes placed in the chamber. If any smoke particles pass into the chamber the ions will attach to the particles and so will be less able to carry the current. An electronic circuit detects the current drop, and sounds the alarm. The reference chamber cancels effects due to air pressure, temperature, or the ageing of the source. Other parts of the circuitry monitor the battery (where used) and sound an intermittent warning when the battery nears exhaustion. A self-test circuit simulates an imbalance in the ionization chamber and verifies the function of power supply, electronics, and alarm device. The standby power draw of an ionization smoke detector is so low that a small battery can provide power for months or years, making the unit independent of AC power supply or external wiring; however, batteries require regular test and replacement.
An ionization type smoke detector is generally cheaper to manufacture than an optical smoke detector; however, it is sometimes rejected because it is more prone to false (nuisance) alarms than photoelectric smoke detectors. It can detect particles of smoke that are too small to be visible.
Americium-241, an alpha emitter, has a half-life of 432 years. Alpha radiation, as opposed to beta and gamma, is used for two additional reasons: Alpha particles have high ionization, so sufficient air particles will be ionized for the current to exist, and they have low penetrative power, meaning they will be stopped by the plastic of the smoke detector or the air. About one percent of the emitted radioactive energy of 241Am is gamma radiation. The amount of elemental americium-241 is small enough to be exempt from the regulations applied to larger sources. It includes about 37 kBq or 1 µCi of radioactive element americium-241 (241Am), corresponding to about 0.3 µg of the isotope. This provides sufficient ion current to detect smoke, while producing a very low level of radiation outside the device.
The americium-241 in ionizing smoke detectors poses a potential environmental hazard. Disposal regulations and recommendations for smoke detectors vary from region to region. Some European countries[which?] have banned the use of domestic ionic smoke alarms.
An air-sampling smoke detector is capable of detecting microscopic particles of smoke. Most air-sampling detectors are aspirating smoke detectors, which work by actively drawing air through a network of small-bore pipes laid out above or below a ceiling in parallel runs covering a protected area. Small holes drilled into each pipe form a matrix of holes (sampling points), providing an even distribution across the pipe network. Air samples are drawn past a sensitive optical device, often a solid-state laser, tuned to detect the extremely small particles of combustion. Air-sampling detectors may be used to trigger an automatic fire response, such as a gaseous fire suppression system, in high-value or mission-critical areas, such as archives or computer server rooms.
Most air-sampling smoke detection systems are capable of a higher sensitivity than spot type smoke detectors and provide multiple levels of alarm threshold, such as Alert, Action, Fire 1 and Fire 2. Thresholds may be set at levels across a wide range of smoke levels. This provides earlier notification of a developing fire than spot type smoke detection, allowing manual intervention or activation of automatic suppression systems before a fire has developed beyond the smoldering stage, thereby increasing the time available for evacuation and minimizing fire damage.
Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide detection
Some smoke alarms use a carbon dioxide sensor or Carbon monoxide sensor to detect characteristic products of combustion. However, some gas sensors react on levels that are dangerous for humans but not typical for a fire; these are therefore not generally sensitive or fast enough to be used as fire detectors. Other gas sensors are even able to warn about particulate-free fires (e. g. certain alcohol fires).
Photoelectric smoke detectors respond faster (typically 30 minutes or more) to fire in its early, smouldering stage (before it breaks into flame). The smoke from the smouldering stage of a fire is typically made up of large combustion particles — between 0.3 and 10.0 µm. Ionization smoke detectors respond faster (typically 30–60 seconds) in the flaming stage of a fire. The smoke from the flaming stage of a fire is typically made up of microscopic combustion particles — between 0.01 and 0.3 µm. Also, ionization detectors are weaker in high air-flow environments, and because of this, the photoelectric smoke detector is more reliable for detecting smoke in both the smoldering and flaming stages of a fire.
In June 2006, the Australasian Fire & Emergency Service Authorities Council, the peak representative body for all Australian and New Zealand Fire Departments published an official report, 'Position on Smoke Alarms in Residential Accommodation'. Clause 3.0 states, "Ionization smoke alarms may not operate in time to alert occupants early enough to escape from smouldering fires." 
In August 2008, the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF-300,000+ members throughout the USA and Canada) passed a Resolution recommending the use of photoelectric smoke alarms. The IAFF states that changing to photoelectric alarms, "Will drastically reduce the loss of life among citizens and fire fighters."
In June 2010, the City of Albany, California enacted photoelectric-only legislation after a unanimous decision by the Albany City Council. This was a catalyst for several other Californian and Ohioan cities to enact legislation requiring photoelectric smoke detectors.
In May 2011, the Fire Protection Association of Australia's (FPAA) official position on smoke alarms states, "Fire Prevention Association Australia considers that all residential buildings should be fitted with photoelectric smoke alarms...".
In November 2011, the Northern Territory enacted Australia's first residential photoelectric legislation mandating the use of photoelectric smoke alarms in all new Northern Territory homes.
In December 2011, the Volunteer Fire Fighter's Association of Australia published a World Fire Safety Foundation report, 'Ionization Smoke Alarms are DEADLY', citing research outlining substantial performance differences between ionization and photoelectric technology.
In June 2013, in an Australian Parliamentary speech, the question was asked, "Are ionization smoke alarms defective?" This was further to the Australian Government's scientific testing agency (the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - CSIRO) data revealing serious performance problems with ionization technology in the early, smoldering stage of fire, a rise in litigation involving ionization smoke alarms, and increasing legislation mandating the installation of photoelectric smoke alarms. The speech cited a May 2013, World Fire Safety Foundation report published in the Australian Volunteer Fire Fighter Association's magazine titled, 'Can Australian and U.S. Smoke Alarm Standards be Trusted?' The speech concluded with a request for one of the world's largest ionization smoke alarm manufacturers and the CSIRO to disclose the level of visible smoke the manufacturers' ionization smoke alarms activate under CSIRO scientific testing.
In November 2013, the Ohio Fire Chiefs' Association (OFCA) published an official position paper supporting the use of photoelectric technology in Ohioan residences. The OFCA's position states, "In the interest of public safety and to protect the public from the deadly effects of smoke and fire, the Ohio Fire Chiefs’ Association endorses the use of Photoelectric Smoke Alarms . . . In both new construction and when replacing old smoke alarms or purchasing new alarms, we recommend Photoelectric Smoke Alarms." 
In June 2014, tests by the North Eastern Ohio Fire Prevention Association (NEOFPA) on residential smoke alarms were broadcast on the ABC's 'Good Morning America' program. The NEOFPA tests showed ionization smoke alarms failing to activate in the early, smoldering stage of fire. The combination ionization/photoelectric alarms failed to activate until an average of over 20 minutes after the stand-alone photoelectric smoke alarms. This vindicated the June 2006, official position of the Australasian Fire & Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC) and the October 2008, official position of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). Both AFAC and the IAFF recommend photoelectric smoke alarms. They do not recommend combination ionization/photoelectric smoke alarms.
Due to the varying levels of detection capabilities between detector types, manufacturers have designed multi-criteria devices which cross-reference the separate signals to both rule out false alarms and improve response times to real fires. Examples include Photo/heat, photo/CO, and even CO/photo/heat/IR.
Obscuration is a unit of measurement that has become the standard definition of smoke detector sensitivity. Obscuration is the effect that smoke has on reducing sensor visibility; higher concentrations of smoke result in higher obscuration levels.
|Typical smoke detector obscuration ratings|
|Type of Detector||Obscuration Level|
|Ionization||2.6–5.0% obs/m (0.8–1.5% obs/ft)|
|Photoelectric||6.5–13.0% obs/m (2–4% obs/ft)|
|Beam||3% obs/m (0.9% obs/ft)|
|Aspirating||0.005–20.5% obs/m (0.0015–6.25% obs/ft)|
|Laser||0.06–6.41% obs/m (0.02–2.0% obs/ft)|
Interconnected smoke detectors
Interconnected smoke detectors are either conventional or analog addressable, and are wired up to security alarm systems or fire alarm systems controlled by fire alarm control panels (FACP). These are the most common type of detector, and usually cost a lot more than single-station battery-operated smoke alarms. They exist in most commercial and industrial facilities and other places such as ships and trains, but are also part of some security alarm systems in homes. These detectors don't need to have built in alarms, as alarm systems can be controlled by the connected FACP, which will set off relevant alarms, and can also implement complex functions such as a staged evacuation.
The word "conventional" is slang used to distinguish the method used to communicate with the control unit in newer addressable systems. So called “conventional detectors” are smoke detectors used in older interconnected systems and resemble electrical switches in their information capacity. These detectors are connected in parallel to the signaling path or (initiating device circuit) so that the current flow is monitored to indicate a closure of the circuit path by any connected detector when smoke or other similar environmental stimulus sufficiently influences any detector. The resulting increase in current flow is interpreted and processed by the control unit as a confirmation of the presence of smoke and a fire alarm signal is generated. In a conventional system, 32 smoke detectors are typically wired together in each zone and a single fire alarm control panel usually monitors a number of zones which can be arranged to correspond to different areas of a building. In the event of a fire, the control panel is able to identify which zone or zones contain the detector or detectors in alarm, but can not identify which individual detector or detectors are in a state of alarm.
An analog addressable system gives each detector an individual number, or address. Addressable systems allow the exact location of an alarm to be plotted on the FACP. In certain systems, a graphical representation of the building is provided on the screeen of the FACP which shows the locations of all of the detectors in the building, while in others the address and location of the detector or detectors in alarm are simply indicated.
Analog addressable systems are usually more expensive than conventional non-addressable systems, and offer extra options, including a custom level of sensitivity (sometimes called Day/Night mode) which can determine the amount of smoke in a given area and contamination detection from the FACP that allows determination of a wide range of faults in detection capabilities of smoke detectors. Detectors become contaminated usually as a result of the build up of atmospheric particulates in the detectors being circulated by the heating and air-conditioning systems in buildings. Other causes include carpentry, sanding, painting, and smoke in the event of a fire. Panels can also be interconnected to control a very large number of detectors in multiple buildings. This is most commonly used in hospitals, universities, resorts and other large centres or institutions.
Single station smoke detectors
The main function of a single station or "standalone" smoke detector is to alert persons at risk. Several methods are used and documented in industry specifications published by Underwriters Laboratories Alerting methods include:
- Audible tones
- Spoken voice alert
- Visual strobe lights
- 177 candela output
- Tactile stimulation, e.g., bed or pillow shaker (No standards exist as of 2008 for tactile stimulation alarm devices.)
Some models have a hush or temporary silence feature that allows silencing without removing the battery. This is especially useful in locations where false alarms can be relatively common (e.g. due to "toast burning") or users could remove the battery permanently to avoid the annoyance of false alarms, but removing the battery permanently is strongly discouraged.
While current technology is very effective at detecting smoke and fire conditions, the deaf and hard of hearing community has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the alerting function in awakening sleeping individuals in certain high-risk groups such as the elderly, those with hearing loss and those who are intoxicated. Between 2005 and 2007, research sponsored by the United States' National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has focused on understanding the cause of a higher number of deaths seen in such high-risk groups. Initial research into the effectiveness of the various alerting methods is sparse. Research findings suggest that a low frequency (520 Hz) square wave output is significantly more effective at awakening high risk individuals. Wireless smoke and carbon monoxide detectors linked to alert mechanisms such as vibrating pillow pads for the hearing impaired, strobes, and remote warning handsets are more effective at waking people with serious hearing loss than other alarms.
Most residential smoke detectors run on 9-volt alkaline or carbon-zinc batteries. When these batteries run down, the smoke detector becomes inactive. Most smoke detectors will signal a low-battery condition. The alarm may chirp at intervals if the battery is low, though if there is more than one unit within earshot, it can be hard to locate. It is common, however, for houses to have smoke detectors with dead batteries. It is estimated, in the UK, that over 30% of smoke alarms may have dead or removed batteries. As a result, public information campaigns have been created to remind people to change smoke detector batteries regularly. In Australia, for example, a public information campaign suggests that smoke alarm batteries should be replaced on April Fools' Day every year. In regions using daylight saving time, campaigns may suggest that people change their batteries when they change their clocks or on a birthday.
Some detectors are also being sold with a lithium battery that can run for about 7 to 10 years, though this might actually make it less likely for people to change batteries, since their replacement is needed so infrequently. By that time, the whole detector may need to be replaced. Though relatively expensive, user-replaceable 9-volt lithium batteries are also available.
Common NiMH and NiCd rechargeable batteries have a high self-discharge rate, making them unsuitable for use in smoke detectors. This is true even though they may provide much more power than alkaline batteries if used soon after charging, such as in a portable stereo. Also, a problem with rechargeable batteries is a rapid voltage drop at the end of their useful charge. This is of concern in devices such as smoke detectors, since the battery may discharge so quickly that the low-battery warning period from the detector is either so brief as to go unnoticed, or may not occur at all.
The NFPA, recommends that home-owners replace smoke detector batteries with a new battery at least once per year, when it starts chirping (a signal that its charge is low), or when it fails a test, which the NFPA recommends to be carried out at least once per month by pressing the "test" button on the alarm.
In 2004, NIST issued a comprehensive report that concludes, among other things, that "smoke alarms of either the ionization type or the photoelectric type consistently provided time for occupants to escape from most residential fires", and "consistent with prior findings, ionization type alarms provided somewhat better response to flaming fires than photoelectric alarms (57 to 62 seconds faster response), and photoelectric alarms provided (often) considerably faster response to smoldering fires than ionization type alarms (47 to 53 minutes faster response)".
The NFPA strongly recommends the replacement of home smoke alarms every 10 years. Smoke alarms become less reliable with time, primarily due to aging of their electronic components, making them susceptible to nuisance false alarms. In ionization type alarms, decay of the 241Am radioactive source is a negligible factor, as its half-life is far greater than the expected useful life of the alarm unit.
Regular cleaning can prevent false alarms caused by the buildup of dust or other objects such as flies, particularly on optical type alarms as they are more susceptible to these factors. A vacuum cleaner can be used to clean ionization and optical detectors externally and internally. However, on commercial ionization detectors it is not recommended for a lay person to clean internally. To reduce false alarms caused by cooking fumes, use an optical or 'toast proof' alarm near the kitchen. 
On the night of May 31, 2001, Bill Hackert and his daughter Christine of Rotterdam, New York died when their house caught fire and a First Alert ionisation smoke detector failed to sound. The cause of the fire was a frayed electrical cord behind a couch that smoldered for hours before engulfing the house with flames and smoke. The ionisation smoke detector was found to be defectively designed, and in 2006 a jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York decided that First Alert and its parent company, BRK Brands, was liable for millions of dollars in damages.
Installation and placement
In the United States, most state and local laws regarding the required number and placement of smoke detectors are based upon standards established in NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code.
Laws governing the installation of smoke detectors vary depending on the locality. Homeowners with questions or concerns regarding smoke detector placement may contact their local fire marshal or building inspector for assistance. However, some rules and guidelines for existing homes are relatively consistent throughout the developed world. For example, Canada and Australia require a building to have a working smoke detector on every level. The United States NFPA code cited in the previous paragraph requires smoke detectors on every habitable level and within the vicinity of all bedrooms. Habitable levels include attics that are tall enough to allow access.
In new construction, minimum requirements are typically more stringent. All smoke detectors must be hooked directly to the electrical wiring, be interconnected and have a battery backup. In addition, smoke detectors are required either inside or outside every bedroom, depending on local codes. Smoke detectors on the outside will detect fires more quickly, assuming the fire does not begin in the bedroom, but the sound of the alarm will be reduced and may not wake some people. Some areas also require smoke detectors in stairways, main hallways and garages.
Wired units with a third "interconnect" wire allow a dozen or more detectors to be connected, so that if one detects smoke, the alarms will sound on all the detectors in the network, improving the chances that occupants will be alerted, even if they are behind closed doors or if the alarm is triggered one or two floors from their location. Wired interconnection may only be practical for use in new construction, especially if the wire needs to be routed in areas that are inaccessible without cutting open walls and ceilings. As of the mid-2000s, development has begun on wirelessly networking smoke alarms, using technologies such as ZigBee, which will allow interconnected alarms to be easily retrofitted in a building without costly wire installations. Some wireless systems using Wi-Safe technology will also detect smoke or carbon monoxide through the detectors, which simultaneously alarm themselves with vibrating pads, strobes and remote warning handsets. As these systems are wireless they can easily be transferred from one property to another.
In the UK, the placement of detectors is similar however the installation of smoke alarms in new builds needs to comply with the British Standards BS5839 pt6. BS 5839: Pt.6: 2004 recommends that a new-build property consisting of no more than 3 floors (less than 200sqm per floor) should be fitted with a Grade D, LD2 system. Building Regulations in England, Wales and Scotland recommend that BS 5839: Pt.6 should be followed, but as a minimum a Grade D, LD3 system should be installed. Building Regulations in Northern Ireland require a Grade D, LD2 system to be installed, with smoke alarms fitted in the escape routes and the main living room and a heat alarm in the kitchen; this standard also requires all detectors to have a main supply and a battery back up.
EN54 European standards
Fire detection products have the European Standard EN 54 Fire Detection and Fire Alarm Systems that is a mandatory standard for every product that is going to be delivered and installed in any country in the European Union (EU). EN 54 part 7 is the standard for smoke detectors. European standard are developed to allow free movement of goods in the European Union countries. EN 54 is widely recognized around the world. The EN 54 certification of each device must be issued annually. 
Coverage of smoke detector and temperature detectors with European standard EN54 (sqm)
|Superfice area (sqm)||Type of Detector||Heigh (m)||Roof Slope ≤20º||Roof Slope >20º|
|Smax(sqm)||Rmax (m)||Smax (sqm)||Rmax(m)|
|6< h ≤ 12||80||6,6||110||9,6|
|SA ≤30||EN54-5 Clase A1||≤7,5||30||4,4||30||5,7|
|EN54-5, Clase A2,B,C,D,F,G||≤ 6||30||4,4||30||5,7|
|SA >30||EN54-5 Clase A1||≤7,5||20||3,5||40||6,5|
|EN54-5 Clase A2,B,C,D,E,F,G||≤6||20||3,5||40||6,5|
- EN54-7, Smoke detector.
- EN54-5, Temperature detector.
- SA = Superfice Area.
- Smax(sqm) = Maximum Superfice coverage.
- Rmax (m) = Maximum Radio.
Information in "bold" is the standard coverage of the detector. Smoke detector coverage is 60sqm and temperature smoke detector is 20sqm. Height from ground is an important issue for a correct protection. You can see "High" in the table for this information.
Australia and United States
In June 2013, a World Fire Safety Foundation report titled, 'Can Australian and U.S. Smoke Alarm Standards be Trusted?' was published in the official magazine of the Australian Volunteer Fire Fighter's Association. The report brings into question the validity of testing criteria used by American and Australian government agencies when undergoing scientific testing of ionization smoke alarms in smoldering fires.
The first automatic electric fire alarm was invented in 1890 by Francis Robbins Upton (U.S. patent no. 436,961). Upton was an associate of Thomas Edison. George Andrew Darby patented the first electrical heat detector and smoke detector in 1902 in Birmingham, England. In the late 1930s, Swiss physicist Walter Jaeger tried to invent a sensor for poison gas. He expected that gas entering the sensor would bind to ionized air molecules and thereby alter an electric current in a circuit in the instrument. His device failed: small concentrations of gas had no effect on the sensor's conductivity. Frustrated, Jaeger lit a cigarette and was soon surprised to notice that a meter on the instrument had registered a drop in current. Smoke particles from his cigarette had apparently done what poison gas could not. Jaeger's experiment was one of the advances that paved the way for the modern smoke detector. In 1939 Swiss physicist Dr. Ernst Meili devised an ionisation chamber device capable of detecting combustible gases in mines. He also invented a cold-cathode tube that could amplify the small electronic signal generated by the detection mechanism to a strength sufficient enough to activate an alarm.
Ionisation smoke detectors were first placed on the market in the United States in 1951 and were used only in major commercial and industrial facilities in the next several years due to their high expense and large size. In 1955, simple home "fire detectors" for homes were invented. They detected high temperatures as the fire cue. The United States Atomic Energy Commission (USAEC) granted the first license to distribute smoke detectors using radioactive material in 1963. The first truly affordable home smoke detector was invented by Duane D. Pearsall and Stanley Bennett Peterson in 1965, featuring an individual battery powered unit that could be easily installed and replaced. These first units, dubbed "SmokeGard 700," were made from strong fire resistant steel and shaped much like bee hives. The idea for mass production came from Peterson, working at Pearsall’s company, Statitrol Corporation, in Lakewood, Colorado in 1975. Studies in the 1960s determined that smoke detectors respond to fires much faster than heat detectors.
The first single-station smoke detector was invented in 1970. It was an ionisation detector powered by a single 9-volt battery. These detectors were made available to the public the next year. They cost about $125 and sold at a rate of a few hundred thousand per year. Several technological developments occurred between 1971 and 1976, including the replacement of cold-cathode tubes with solid-state circuitry, which greatly reduced the detectors' sizes and made it possible to monitor both the decrease in voltage and the build-up of internal resistance in the battery. Either of these would trigger a signal to replace the battery. The previous alarm horns, which required specialty batteries were replaced with horns that were more energy-efficient, enabling the use of commonly available sizes of batteries. These detectors could also function with smaller amounts of radioactive source material, and the sensing chamber and smoke detector enclosure were redesigned for more effective operation. The need for a quick replace battery didn't take long to show itself and the rechargeable was replaced with a pair of AA batteries along with a plastic shell encasing the detector. The small assembly line sent close to 500 units per day before Statitrol sold its invention to Emerson Electric in 1980 and Sears' retailers picked up full distribution of the 'now required in every home' smoke detector.
The first standard for home smoke alarms, NFPA 74, was established in 1967. In 1969, the AEC allowed homeowners to use smoke detectors without a license. The Life Safety Code (NFPA 101), passed by the National Fire Protection Association in 1976, first required smoke alarms in homes. By 1980, half of all Americans had smoke alarms in their homes. That number soared to 75 percent by 1984. Smoke alarm sensitivity requirements in UL 217 were modified in 1985 to reduce susceptibility to nuisance alarms. In 1988 BOCA, ICBO, and SBCCI model building codes begin requiring smoke alarms to be interconnected and located in all sleeping rooms. In 1989 NFPA 74 first required smoke alarms to be interconnected in every new home construction, and in 1993 NFPA 72 first required that smoke alarms be placed in all bedrooms. The 10-year-lithium-battery-powered smoke alarm was invented in 1995. NFPA began requiring the replacement of smoke detectors after ten years in 1999. As of November 2013 it is estimated that smoke detectors are installed in 93 percent of US homes and 85 percent of UK homes. 30 percent of these alarms are estimated to not work, due to aging, removal of batteries, or failure of owners to replace dead batteries.
- "Learn About Smoke Alarms". Usfa.fema.gov. 2014-06-03. Retrieved 2014-08-22.
- Fleming, Jay. "Smoke Detector Technology Research", retrieved 2011-11-07
- Cote, Arthur; Bugbee, Percy (1988). "Ionization smoke detectors". Principles of fire protection. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. p. 249. ISBN 0-87765-345-3.
- Residential Smoke Alarm Performance, Thomas Cleary, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, UL Smoke and Fire Dynamics Seminar. November, 2007.
- Performance of Home Smoke Alarms Analysis of the Response of Several Available Technologies in Residential Fire Settings, http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire07/art063.html, Bukowski, Cleary et al
- "Smoke detectors and americium-241 fact sheet". Canadian Nuclear Society. Retrieved 2009-08-31.
- Julie Louise Gerberding (April 2004). "Toxicological Profile For Americium" (PDF; 2.1MiB). United States Department of Health and Human Services/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
- "Disposing of Smoke Detectors | Radiation Protection | US EPA". EPA. 27 June 2012. Retrieved 2013-06-26.
- "Safe disposal of smoke alarms - Fire and Rescue NSW". NSW Government. 26 November 2012. Retrieved 2013-06-26.
- "Smoke alarms in the home". Confederation of Fire Protection Associations in Europe. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
- "Radiological Agent: Americium-241". cbwinfo.com. 2006. Retrieved 2013-09-12.
- New York City Fire Department. "Carbon monoxide alarms". Retrieved 2012-05-28.
- "CO2 is an excellent fire indicator". senseair AB. p. 4. Retrieved 2012-08-18.
- "Fire and Life Safety in Mission-Critical Applications". Life Safety Magazine. Retrieved 2011-07-01.
- "Position on Smoke Alarms in Residential Accommodation". Australasian Fire & Emergency Service Authorities Council. Retrieved 2006-06-01.
- "International Association of Fire Fighters Resolution 15". The International Association of Fire Fighters, California, USA. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
- "Albany, California Ordinance 2010-06 Photoelectric Specific Requirements". The Albany City Council, Albany, California, USA. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
- "Position Statement - Selection of Residential Smoke Alarms - clause 5.0, page 7, May, 2011". Fire Protection Association Australia. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
- "Northern Territory Photoelectric smoke alarm legislation". Northern Territory Fire & Rescue Service. Retrieved 2001-06-27.
- "Ionization Smoke Alarms Are DEADLY". The World Fire Safety Foundation. Retrieved 2001-06-27.
- "Smoke Alarms". Hansard - Mr Christopher Gulaptis MP, Private Member's Statements, New South Wales Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, New South Wales, Australia 20 June 2013, pp.22218. Retrieved 2013-06-26.
- "OFCA Position Statement on Smoke Alarms". Ohio Fire Chief's Association. Retrieved 2014-10-03.
- "‘GMA’ Investigates: Will Your Smoke Detector Respond Fast Enough?". Good Morning America. Retrieved 2014-05-29.
- "Smoke Alarm Myths Explained". The World Fire Safety Foundation. Retrieved 2014-09-03.
- Brazzell, D. "The Effects of High Air Velocity and Complex Airflow Patterns on Smoke Detector Performance". Retrieved 2009-05-13.
- "Low-Profile Plug-in Intelligent Laser Smoke Detector". Retrieved 2014-05-01.
- Fire Alarm System
- Fisher, Jeff. "Adding Smoke Detectors to a Security System". Wiki.hometech.com. TechWiki. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
- "Addressable Equipment". Westminster International Ltd. Retrieved 2010-06-09.
- "Contaminated (dirty) Smoke Detectors". Firewize.com. Firewize Holdings Pty Ltd. 2012. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
- Underwriters Laboratories 217. "Single and Multiple Station Smoke Alarms, UL 1971: Signaling Devices for the Hearing Impaired, UL 268: Smoke Detectors for Fire Alarm Signaling Systems".
- Alarm concern from the Hearing Loss Association of America
- Hearing Loss Web discusses current low frequency alarms for hard of hearing.
- Beacham, Janine. "Don't be a fool: change alarm batteries". Augusta Margaret River Mail. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
- "SMOKE ALARM SAFETY TIPS". Safety Information. National Fire Protection Association. Retrieved 2009-05-17.
- "Cleaning Smoke Detectors and Smoke Alarms"
- Bob Segall/13 Investigates (April 2, 2008). "Federal appeals court upholds $2.8M award for faulty smoke alarm". Indianapolis News Weather. WTHR. Retrieved 2008-10-28.
- NFPA 72, Act No. 72-2013 of 2013 (in English). Retrieved on 6 August 2014.
- "CEN - Technical Bodies". Cen.eu. 2012-11-11. Retrieved 2014-08-22.
- "BS EN 54-11:2001 - Fire detection and fire alarm systems. Manual call points – BSI British Standards". Shop.bsigroup.com. Retrieved 2014-08-22.
- "Can Australian and U.S. Smoke Alarm Standards be Trusted?". The World Fire Safety Foundation. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
- Essays, UK (November 2013). "History And Properties Of Fire Alarms Engineering Essay". Nottingham, UK: UKEssays.com. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
- Prosser, Richard. Birmingham Inventors And Inventions. H.M. Patent Office (originally 1881) later published by S.R. Publishers 1970. ISBN 0-85409-578-0.
- "NRC: Fact Sheet on Smoke Detectors". NRC.gov. United States Nuclear Regulation Commission. 4 September 2013. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
- Wallis, Ian (1 November 2013). 50 Best Business Ideas That Changed the World. Jaico Publishing House. ISBN 9788184952841. Retrieved 2014-11-20.
- "How smoke detector is made". Madehow.com. Advameg, Inc. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
- Public/Private Fire Safety Council (2006). White Paper: Home Smoke Alarms and Other Fire Detection and Alarm Equipment (Technical report). Public/Private Fire Safety Council. 1.
- Ha, Peter (25 October 2010). "Smoke Detector". Time Magazine (Time, Inc.) (ALL-TIME 100 Gadgets): 1. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
- Voluntary Standards and Accreditation Act of 1977, Act No. S. 825 of 1 March 1977 (in English). Retrieved on 24 July 2014.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Smoke detector.|
- National Fire Protection Association
- Smoke alarm research from the national institute of Standards and Technology
- Information on Ionization detectors vs. Photoelectric detectors
- Report from the UL smoke alarm STP research group
- explanation with graphics of different sensor types (ionisation, optical, heat, multi-sensor)
- Key Asset Protection with Video Smoke Detection