Solar cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Solar cells)
Jump to: navigation, search
For convection cells on the sun's surface, see Granule (solar physics).
A solar cell made from a monocrystalline silicon wafer with its contact grid made from busbars (the larger strips) and fingers (the smaller ones)
Solar cells can be used in devices such as this portable monocrystalline solar charger.
A monocrystalline solar cell

A solar cell (also called a photovoltaic cell) is an electrical device that converts the energy of light directly into electricity by the photovoltaic effect. It is a form of photoelectric cell, defined as a device whose electrical characteristics—e.g. current, voltage, or resistance—vary when exposed to light.

Cells can be described as photovoltaic even when the light source is not necessarily sunlight (lamplight, artificial light, etc.) Photovoltaic cells are used as a photodetector (for example infrared detectors), detecting light or other electromagnetic radiation near the visible range, or measuring light intensity.

The operation of a photovoltaic (PV) cell requires 3 basic attributes:

  • The absorption of light, generating either electron-hole pairs or excitons.
  • The separation of charge carriers of opposite types.
  • The separate extraction of those carriers to an external circuit.

In contrast, a solar thermal collector supplies heat by absorbing sunlight, for the purpose of either direct heating or indirect electrical power generation from heat. A "photoelectrolytic cell" (photoelectrochemical cell), on the other hand, refers either to a type of photovoltaic cell (like that developed by Edmond Becquerel and modern dye-sensitized solar cells), or to a device that splits water directly into hydrogen and oxygen using only solar illumination.

Building block of a solar panel[edit]

Main article: Solar panel

Assemblies of photovoltaic cells are used to make solar modules which generate electrical power from sunlight. Multiple cells in an integrated group, all oriented in one plane, constitute a solar photovoltaic panel or "solar photovoltaic module," as distinguished from a "solar thermal module" or "solar hot water panel." The electrical energy generated from solar modules, colloquially referred to as solar power, is an example of solar energy. A group of connected solar modules is called an "array."

History[edit]

The photovoltaic effect was first experimentally demonstrated by French physicist Edmond Becquerel. In 1839, at age 19, he built the world's first photovoltaic cell in his father's laboratory. Willoughby Smith first described the "Effect of Light on Selenium during the passage of an Electric Current" in a 20 February 1873 issue of Nature. In 1883 Charles Fritts built the first solid state photovoltaic cell by coating the semiconductor selenium with a thin layer of gold to form the junctions. The device was only around 1% efficient. In 1888 Russian physicist Aleksandr Stoletov built the first cell based on the outer photoelectric effect discovered by Heinrich Hertz in 1887.[1]

Albert Einstein explained the underlying mechanism of light instigated carrier excitation—the photoelectric effect—in 1905, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921.[2] Russell Ohl patented the modern junction semiconductor solar cell in 1946,[3] discovered while working on the series of advances that would lead to the transistor.

The first practical photovoltaic cell was publicly demonstrated on April 25, 1954 at Bell Laboratories.[4] The inventors were Daryl Chapin, Calvin Souther Fuller and Gerald Pearson.[5]

Solar cells gained prominence when they were proposed as an addition to the 1958 Vanguard I satellite. By adding cells to the outside of the body, the mission time could be extended with no major changes to the spacecraft or its power systems. In 1959 the United States launched Explorer 6, featuring large wing-shaped solar arrays, which became a common feature in satellites. These arrays consisted of 9600 Hoffman solar cells.

Improvements were gradual over the next two decades. The only significant use was in space applications where they offered the best power-to-weight ratio. However, this success was also the reason that costs remained high, because space users were willing to pay for the best possible cells, leaving no reason to invest in lower-cost, less-efficient solutions. The price was determined largely by the semiconductor industry; their move to integrated circuits in the 1960s led to the availability of larger boules at lower relative prices. As their price fell, the price of the resulting cells did as well. These effects lowered 1971 cell costs to some $100 per watt.[6]

Berman's price reductions[edit]

Dr. Elliot Berman testing various solar arrays manufactured by his company, Solar Power Corporation.

In the late 1969, Elliot Berman was investigating organic solar cells, when he joined a team at Exxon SPC who were looking for projects 30 years in the future. The group had concluded that electrical power would be much more expensive by 2000, and felt that this increase in price would make alternative energy sources more attractive, finding solar the most interesting. He conducted a market study and concluded that a price per watt of about $20/watt would create significant demand.[7]

The first improvement was the realization that the standard semiconductor manufacturing process was not ideal. The team eliminated the steps of polishing the wafers and coating them with an anti-reflective layer, relying on the rough-sawn wafer surface. The team also replaced the expensive materials and hand wiring used in space applications with a printed circuit board on the back, acrylic plastic on the front, and silicone glue between the two, "potting" the cells.[8] Solar cells could be made using cast-off material from the electronics market.

The company started buying up "reject" silicon at very low cost. They used the largest wafers available, thereby reducing the amount of wiring for a given panel area and packaged them into panels. By 1973 SPC was producing panels at $10 per watt and selling them at $20 per watt, an 80% decrease in two years.

Navigation market[edit]

SPC convinced Tideland Signal to use its panels to power navigational buoys, after finding that Automatic Power, the market leader had purchased and shelved a solar navigation aid prototype from Hoffman Electronics to protect its battery business. Tideland's solar-powered buoy quickly overtook Automatic.[9]

The rapidly-increasing number of offshore oil platforms and loading facilities led Arco to buy Solar Power International (SPI), forming ARCO Solar. ARCO Solar's factory in Camarillo, California was the first dedicated to building solar panels, and was in continual operation from its purchase by ARCO in 1977 until 2011 when it was closed by SolarWorld.

Following the 1973 oil crisis oil companies used their higher profits to start solar firms, and were for decades the largest producers. Exxon, ARCO, Shell, Amoco (later purchased by BP) and Mobil all had major solar divisions during the 1970s and 1980s. Technology companies also participated, including General Electric, Motorola, IBM, Tyco and RCA.[10]

Declining costs[edit]

Further improvements reduced production costs to under $1 a watt, with wholesale costs well under $2. Balance of system costs were then higher than the panels. Large commercial arrays could be built, as of 2010, at below $3.40 a watt, fully commissioned.[11][12]

As the semiconductor industry moved to ever-larger boules, older equipment became inexpensive. Cell sizes grew as equipment became available on the surplus market; ARCO Solar's original panels used cells 2 to 4 inches (50 to 100 mm) in diameter. Panels in the 1990s and early 2000s generally used 125 mm wafers; since 2008 almost all new panels use 150 mm cells. The widespread introduction of flat screen televisions in the late 1990s and early 2000s led to the wide availability of large, high-quality glass sheets to cover the panels.

During the 1990s, polysilicon ("poly") cells became increasingly popular. These cells offer less efficiency than their monosilicon ("mono") counterparts, but they are grown in large vats that reduce cost. By the mid-2000s, poly was dominant in the low-cost panel market, but more recently the mono returned to widespread use.

Manufacturers of wafer-based cells responded to high silicon prices in 2004–2008 with rapid reductions in silicon consumption. In 2008, according to Jef Poortmans, director of IMEC's organic and solar department, current cells use 8–9 grams (0.28–0.32 oz) of silicon per watt of power generation, with wafer thicknesses in the neighborhood of 0.200 mm.

First Solar was briefly the largest panel manufacturer in 2009, using a thin-film CdTe cell sandwiched between two layers of glass.[citation needed] Silicon panels returned to dominance via lower prices, partly from the shift to Chinese manufacturers. By late 2011, a drop in European demand due to budgetary turmoil dropped prices for crystalline solar modules to about $1.09[12] per watt down sharply from 2010. Prices continued to fall in 2012, reaching $0.62/watt by 4Q2012.[13]

Applications[edit]

Polycrystalline photovoltaic cells laminated to backing material in a module
Polycrystalline photovoltaic cells
Main article: Photovoltaic system

Solar cells are often encapsulated as a module. Photovoltaic modules often have a sheet of glass on the sun-facing side, allowing light to pass while protecting the semiconductor wafers. Solar cells are usually connected in series in modules, creating an additive voltage. Connecting cells in parallel yields a higher current; however, problems such as shadow effects can shut down the weaker (less illuminated) parallel string (a number of series connected cells) causing substantial power loss and possible damage because of the reverse bias applied to the shadowed cells by their illuminated partners. Strings of series cells are usually handled independently and not connected in parallel, though (as of 2014) individual power boxes are often supplied for each module, and are connected in parallel. Although modules can be interconnected to create an array with the desired peak DC voltage and loading current capacity, using independent MPPTs (maximum power point trackers) is preferable. Otherwise, shunt diodes can reduce shadowing power loss in arrays with series/parallel connected cells.[citation needed]

Theory[edit]

Main article: Theory of solar cells

The solar cell works in several steps:

  • Photons in sunlight hit the solar panel and are absorbed by semiconducting materials, such as silicon.
  • Electrons are excited from their current molecular/atomic orbital. Once excited an electron can either dissipate the energy as heat and return to its orbital or travel through the cell until it reaches an electrode. Current flows through the material to cancel the potential and this electricity is captured.
  • An array of solar cells converts solar energy into a usable amount of direct current (DC) electricity.
  • An inverter can convert the power to alternating current (AC).

Efficiency[edit]

Main article: Solar cell efficiency
Solar panels on the International Space Station absorb light from both sides. These Bifacial cells are more efficient and operate at lower temperature than single sided equivalents.

Solar cell efficiency may be broken down into reflectance efficiency, thermodynamic efficiency, charge carrier separation efficiency and conductive efficiency. The overall efficiency is the product of these individual metrics.

A solar cell has a voltage dependent efficiency curve, temperature coefficients and allowable shadow angles.

Due to the difficulty in measuring these parameters directly, other parameters are substituted: thermodynamic efficiency, quantum efficiency, integrated quantum efficiency, VOC ratio, and fill factor. Reflectance losses are a portion of quantum efficiency under "external quantum efficiency". Recombination losses make up another portion of quantum efficiency, VOC ratio, and fill factor. Resistive losses are predominantly categorized under fill factor, but also make up minor portions of quantum efficiency, VOC ratio.

The fill factor is the ratio of the actual maximum obtainable power to the product of the open circuit voltage and short circuit current. This is a key parameter in evaluating performance. In 2009, typical commercial solar cells had a fill factor > 0.70. Grade B cells were usually between 0.4 to 0.7.[14] Cells with a high fill factor have a low equivalent series resistance and a high equivalent shunt resistance, so less of the current produced by the cell is dissipated in internal losses.

Single p–n junction crystalline silicon devices are now approaching the theoretical limiting power efficiency of 33.7%, noted as the Shockley–Queisser limit in 1961. In the extreme, with an infinite number of layers, the corresponding limit is 86% using concentrated sunlight.[15]

In September 2013, a solar cell achieved a new record with 44.7 percent efficiency, as demonstrated by the German Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems.[16]

Upconversion[edit]

One efficiency technique is to incorporate lanthanide-doped materials (Er3+
, Yb3+
, Ho3+
or a combination), taking advantage of their luminescence to convert infrared radiation to visible light. This process, called upconversion, occurs when two low-energy infrared photons are absorbed by rare-earth ions to generate a (high-energy) absorbable photon. As example, the energy transfer upconversion process (ETU), consists in successive transfer processes between excited ions in the near infrared. The upconverter material could be placed below the solar cell to absorb the infrared light that passes through the silicon. Useful ions are most commonly found in the trivalent state. Er+
ions have been the most used. Er3+
ions absorb solar radiation around 1.54 µm. Two Er3+
ions that have absorbed this radiation can interact with each other through an upconversion process. The excited ion emits light above the Si bandgap that is absorbed by the solar cell and creates an additional electron–hole pair that can generate current. However, the increased efficiency was small. In addition, fluoroindate glasses have low phonon energy and have been proposed as suitable matrix doped with Ho3+
ions.[17]

Cost[edit]

Solar power costs consist of three categories, manufacturing/distribution, installation and subsidies.

The cost before subsidies is stated per unit of peak electrical power.

Manufacturing/distribution[edit]

Many costs are proportional to the panel area or land area involved. A higher efficiency cell may reduce the required space and so reduce the total plant cost, even if individual cells are more costly. To be useful in evaluating solar costs, they must be evaluated under realistic conditions.[18]

Installation[edit]

Consumer installation costs have reduced only slowly, because of its reliance on human labor. Concentrated solar power offers greater economies of scale, given its much larger size.


Subsidies[edit]

Solar-specific feed-in tariffs vary by country and within countries. Such tariffs encourage the development of solar power projects.

Grid parity[edit]

Widespread grid parity, the point at which photovoltaic electricity is equal to or cheaper than grid power without subsidies, likely requires advances on all three fronts. Proponents of solar hope to achieve grid parity first in areas with abundant sun and high electricity costs such as in California and Japan.[19] In 2007 BP claimed grid parity for Hawaii and other islands that otherwise use diesel fuel to produce electricity. George W. Bush set 2015 as the date for grid parity in the US.[20][21] The Photovoltaic Association reported in 2012 that Australia had reached grid parity (ignoring feed in tariffs).[22]


The price of solar panels fell steadily for 40 years, interrupted in 2004 when high subsidies in Germany drastically increased demand there and greatly increased the price of purified silicon (which is used in computer chips as well as solar panels). The recession of 2008 and the onset of Chinese manufacturing caused prices to resume their decline. In the four years after January 2008 prices for solar modules in Germany dropped from €3 to €1 per peak watt. During that same time production capacity surged with an annual growth of more than 50%. China increased market share from 8% in 2008 to over 55% in the last quarter of 2010.[23] In December 2012 the price of Chinese solar panels had dropped to $0.60/Wp (crystalline modules).[24]

Swanson's law is an observation similar to Moore's Law that states that solar cell prices fall 20% for every doubling of industry capacity. It was featured in an article in the British weekly newspaper The Economist.[25]

Materials[edit]

The Shockley-Queisser limit for the theoretical maximum efficiency of a solar cell. Semiconductors with band gap between 1 and 1.5eV, or near-infrared light, have the greatest potential to form an efficient single-junction cell. (The efficiency "limit" shown here can be exceeded by multijunction solar cells.)

Solar cell materials must have characteristics that match the spectrum of available light. Some cells are designed to handle sunlight that reaches the Earth surface. Others are optimized for use in space. Light-absorbing materials can often be used in multiple physical configurations to take advantage of various absorption and charge separation mechanisms.

Industrial cells are made of monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, copper indium selenide/sulfide or GaAs-based multijunction.

As of 2014 typical solar cells are made from semiconductors wafers between 180 to 240 micrometers thick.

Crystalline silicon[edit]

Basic structure of a silicon based solar cell and its working mechanism.

By far, the most prevalent bulk material for solar cells is crystalline silicon (abbreviated as a group as c-Si), also known as "solar grade silicon". Bulk silicon is separated into multiple categories according to crystallinity and crystal size in the resulting ingot, ribbon or wafer. These cells are entirely based around the concept of a p-n junction.

  • Monocrystalline silicon (c-Si)—often made using the Czochralski process. Single-crystal wafer cells tend to be expensive, and because they are cut from cylindrical ingots, do not completely cover a square solar cell module without a substantial waste of refined silicon. Hence most c-Si panels have uncovered gaps at their four corners.
  • Polycrystalline silicon, or multicrystalline silicon, (poly-Si or mc-Si)—made from cast square ingots—large blocks of molten silicon carefully cooled and solidified. Poly-Si cells are less expensive and less efficient than single monos. United States Department of Energy data show more polycrystalline than monocrystalline sales.
  • Ribbon silicon[26] is a type of polycrystalline silicon—it is formed by drawing flat thin films from molten silicon and results in a polycrystalline structure. These cells have lower efficiencies and costs than poly-Si due to a great reduction in silicon waste, as this approach does not require sawing from ingots.
  • Mono-like-multi silicon (MLM)—This form was developed in the 2000s and introduced commercially around 2009. Also called cast-mono, uses polycrystalline casting chambers with small "seeds" of mono material. The result is a bulk mono-like material that is polycrystalline around the outsides. When sliced for processing, the inner sections are high-efficiency mono-like cells (but square instead of "clipped"), while the outer edges are sold as conventional poly. The result mono-like cells at poly-like prices.[27]

Thin film[edit]

Main article: Thin film solar cell

Thin-film technologies reduce the amount of active material in a cell. Most sandwich active material between two panes of glass. Since silicon solar panels only use one pane of glass, thin film panels are approximately twice as heavy as crystalline silicon panels, although they have a smaller ecological impact (determined from life cycle analysis).[28] The majority of film panels have 2-3 percentage points lower conversion efficiencies than crystalline silicon.[29] Cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) are three thin-film technologies often used for outdoor applications. As of December 2013, CdTe cost per installed watt was $0.59 as reported by First Solar. CIGS technology laboratory demonstrations reached 20.4% as of December 2013. The lab efficiency of GaAs thin film technology topped 28%.[citation needed] The quantum efficiency of thin film solar cells is also lower due to reduced number of collected charge carriers per incident photon.

Cadmium telluride[edit]

Cadmium telluride is the only thin film material so far to rival crystalline silicon in cost/watt. However cadmium is a highly toxic and tellurium (anion: "telluride") supplies are limited.

The cadmium present in the cells would be toxic if released. However, release is impossible during normal operation of the cells and is unlikely during fires in residential roofs.[30] A square meter of CdTe contains approximately the same amount of Cd as a single C cell nickel-cadmium battery, in a more stable and less soluble form.[30]

Copper indium gallium selenide[edit]

Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) is a direct band gap material. It has the highest efficiency (~20%) among thin film materials (see CIGS solar cell). Traditional methods of fabrication involve vacuum processes including co-evaporation and sputtering. Recent developments at IBM and Nanosolar attempt to lower the cost by using non-vacuum solution processes.[citation needed]

GaAs thin film cells[edit]

The Dutch Radboud University Nijmegen made a single junction GaAs cell that reached 25.8% in August 2008, using a 4 µm thick GaAs layer transferred from a wafer base to glass or plastic film. Recently, this increased to 28.8%.[31] The efficiency was attributed to high quality GaAs epitaxial growth, surface passivation by the AlGaAs[32] and the promotion of photon recycling.[33]

Silicon thin film[edit]

Silicon thin-film cells are mainly deposited by chemical vapor deposition (typically plasma-enhanced, PE-CVD) from silane gas and hydrogen gas. Depending on the deposition parameters, this can yield:[34]

Amorphous silicon is the most well-developed thin film technology to-date. An amorphous silicon (a-Si) solar cell is made of amorphous (non-crystalline) or microcrystalline silicon. Amorphous silicon has a higher bandgap (1.7 eV) than crystalline silicon (c-Si) (1.1 eV), which means it absorbs the visible part of the solar spectrum more strongly than the higher energy infrared portion of the spectrum. The production of a-Si thin film solar cells uses glass as a substrate and deposits a very thin layer of silicon by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).


Protocrystalline silicon with a low volume fraction of nanocrystalline silicon is optimal for high open circuit voltage.[35] Nc-Si has about the same bandgap as c-Si and nc-Si and a-Si can advantageously be combined in thin layers, creating a layered cell called a tandem cell. The top cell in a-Si absorbs the visible light and leaves the infrared part of the spectrum for the bottom cell in nc-Si.

Multijunction cells[edit]

Multijunction cells were originally developed for special applications such as satellites and space exploration, but are now used effectively with terrestrial solar concentrators. Multijunction cells consist of multiple thin films, each essentially a solar cell in its own right, grown on top of each other, typically using metalorganic vapour phase epitaxy. A triple-junction cell, for example, may consist of the semiconductors: GaAs, Ge, and GaInP
2
.[36] Each layers has a different band gap energy to allow it to absorb electromagnetic radiation over a different portion of the spectrum.

GaAs based multijunction devices are the most efficient solar cells to date. In 15 October 2012, triple junction metamorphic cell reached a record high of 44%.[37]

Tandem solar cells based on monolithic, series connected, gallium indium phosphide (GaInP), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and germanium (Ge) p–n junctions, are increasing sales, despite cost pressures.[38] Between December 2006 and December 2007, the cost of 4N gallium metal rose from about $350 per kg to $680 per kg. Additionally, germanium metal prices have risen substantially to $1000–1200 per kg this year. Those materials include gallium (4N, 6N and 7N Ga), arsenic (4N, 6N and 7N) and germanium, pyrolitic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles for growing crystals, and boron oxide, these products are critical to the entire substrate manufacturing industry.[citation needed]

Triple-junction GaAs solar cells were used as the power source of the Dutch four-time World Solar Challenge winners Nuna in 2003, 2005 and 2007 and by the Dutch solar cars Solutra (2005), Twente One (2007) and 21Revolution (2009).[citation needed]

Emerging research topics and pre-industrial technology in solar cells[edit]

Light-absorbing dyes[edit]

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are made of low-cost materials and do not need elaborate manufacturing equipment, so they can be made in a DIY fashion. In bulk it should be significantly less expensive than older solid-state cell designs. DSSC's can be engineered into flexible sheets and although its conversion efficiency is less than the best thin film cells, its price/performance ratio may be high enough to allow them to compete with fossil fuel electrical generation.

Typically a ruthenium metalorganic dye (Ru-centered) is used as a monolayer of light-absorbing material. The dye-sensitized solar cell depends on a mesoporous layer of nanoparticulate titanium dioxide to greatly amplify the surface area (200–300 m2/g TiO
2
, as compared to approximately 10 m2/g of flat single crystal). The photogenerated electrons from the light absorbing dye are passed on to the n-type TiO
2
and the holes are absorbed by an electrolyte on the other side of the dye. The circuit is completed by a redox couple in the electrolyte, which can be liquid or solid. This type of cell allows more flexible use of materials and is typically manufactured by screen printing or ultrasonic nozzles, with the potential for lower processing costs than those used for bulk solar cells. However, the dyes in these cells also suffer from degradation under heat and UV light and the cell casing is difficult to seal due to the solvents used in assembly. The first commercial shipment of DSSC solar modules occurred in July 2009 from G24i Innovations.[39]

Quantum dots[edit]

Quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs) are based on the Gratzel cell, or dye-sensitized solar cell architecture, but employ low band gap semiconductor nanoparticles, fabricated with crystallite sizes small enough to form quantum dots (such as CdS, CdSe, Sb
2
S
3
, PbS, etc.), instead of organic or organometallic dyes as light absorbers. QD's size quantization allows for the band gap to be tuned by simply changing particle size. They also have high extinction coefficients and have shown the possibility of multiple exciton generation.[40]

In a QDSC, a mesoporous layer of titanium dioxide nanoparticles forms the backbone of the cell, much like in a DSSC. This TiO
2
layer can then be made photoactive by coating with semiconductor quantum dots using chemical bath deposition, electrophoretic deposition or successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction. The electrical circuit is then completed through the use of a liquid or solid redox couple. The efficiency of QDSCs has increased[41] to over 5% shown for both liquid-junction[42] and solid state cells.[43] In an effort to decrease production costs, the Prashant Kamat research group[44] demonstrated a solar paint made with TiO
2
and CdSe that can be applied using a one-step method to any conductive surface with efficiencies over 1%.[45]

Organic/polymer solar cells[edit]

Organic solar cells and polymer solar cells are built from thin films (typically 100 nm) of organic semiconductors including polymers, such as polyphenylene vinylene and small-molecule compounds like copper phthalocyanine (a blue or green organic pigment) and carbon fullerenes and fullerene derivatives such as PCBM.

They can be processed from liquid solution, offering the possibility of a simple roll-to-roll printing process, potentially leading to inexpensive, large scale production. In addition, these cells could be beneficial for some applications where mechanical flexibility and disposability are important. Current cell efficiencies are, however, very low, and practical devices are essentially non-existent.

Energy conversion efficiencies achieved to date using conductive polymers are very low compared to inorganic materials. However, Konarka Power Plastic reached efficiency of 8.3%[46] and organic tandem cells in 2012 reached 11.1%.[citation needed]

The active region of an organic device consists of two materials, one electron donor and one electron acceptor. When a photon is converted into an electron hole pair, typically in the donor material, the charges tend to remain bound in the form of an exciton, separating when the exciton diffuses to the donor-acceptor interface, unlike most other solar cell types. The short exciton diffusion lengths of most polymer systems tend to limit the efficiency of such devices. Nanostructured interfaces, sometimes in the form of bulk heterojunctions, can improve performance.[47]


In 2011, MIT and Michigan State researchers developed solar cells with a power efficiency close to 2% with a transparency to the human eye greater than 65%, achieved by selectively absorbing the ultraviolet and near-infrared parts of the spectrum with small-molecule compounds.[48][49] Researchers at UCLA more recently developed an analogous polymer solar cell, following the same approach, that is 70% transparent and has a 4% power conversion efficiency.[50][51][52] These lightweight, flexible cells can be produced in bulk at a low cost and could be used to create power generating windows.

In 2013, researchers announced polymer cells with some 3% efficiency. They used block copolymers, self-assembling organic materials that arrange themselves into distinct layers. The research focused on P3HT-b-PFTBT that separates into bands some 16 nanometers wide.[53][54]

Manufacture[edit]

Early solar powered calculator

Solar cells share some of the same processing and manufacturing techniques as other semiconductor devices. However, the stringent requirements for cleanliness and quality control of semiconductor fabrication are more relaxed for solar cells, lowering costs.

Poly-crystalline silicon wafers are made by wire-sawing block-cast silicon ingots into 180 to 350 micrometer wafers. The wafers are usually lightly p-type-doped. A surface diffusion of n-type dopants is performed on the front side of the wafer. This forms a p–n junction a few hundred nanometers below the surface.

Anti-reflection coatings are then typically applied to increase the amount of light coupled into the solar cell. Silicon nitride has gradually replaced titanium dioxide as the preferred material, because of its excellent surface passivation qualities. It prevents carrier recombination at the cell surface. A layer several hundred nanometers thick is applied using PECVD. Some solar cells have textured front surfaces that, like anti-reflection coatings, increase the amount of light reaching the wafer. Such surfaces were first applied to single-crystal silicon, followed by multicrystalline silicon somewhat later.

A full area metal contact is made on the back surface, and a grid-like metal contact made up of fine "fingers" and larger "bus bars" are screen-printed onto the front surface using a silver paste. The rear contact is formed by screen-printing a metal paste, typically aluminium. Usually this contact covers the entire rear, though some designs employ a grid pattern. The paste is then fired at several hundred degrees Celsius to form metal electrodes in ohmic contact with the silicon. Some companies use an additional electro-plating step to increase efficiency. After the metal contacts are made, the solar cells are interconnected by flat wires or metal ribbons, and assembled into modules or "solar panels". Solar panels have a sheet of tempered glass on the front, and a polymer encapsulation on the back.

Manufacturers and certification[edit]

Further information: List of photovoltaics companies
Solar cell production by region[55]

National Renewable Energy Laboratory tests and validates solar technologies. Three reliable groups certify solar equipment: UL and IEEE (both U.S. standards) and IEC.

Solar cells are manufactured in volume in Japan, Germany, China, Taiwan, Malaysia and the United States, whereas Europe, China, the U.S., and Japan have dominated (94% or more as of 2013) in installed systems.[56] Other nations are acquiring significant solar cell production capacity.

Global PV cell/module production increased by 10% in 2012 despite a 9% decline in solar energy investments according to the annual 'PV Status Report" released by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. Between 2009 and 2013 cell production has quadrupled.[56][57][58]

China[edit]

Due to heavy government investment, China has become the dominant force in solar cell manufacturing. Chinese companies produced solar cells/modules with a capacity of ~23 GW in 2013 (60% of global production).[56]

United States[edit]

Solar cell production in the U.S. has suffered due to the global financial crisis, but recovered partly due to the falling price of quality silicon.[59][60]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Gevorkian, Peter (2007). Sustainable energy systems engineering: the complete green building design resource. McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-07-147359-0. 
  2. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921: Albert Einstein", Nobel Prize official page
  3. ^ "Light sensitive device" U.S. Patent 2,402,662 Issue date: June 1946
  4. ^ "April 25, 1954: Bell Labs Demonstrates the First Practical Silicon Solar Cell". APS News (American Physical Society) 18 (4). April 2009. 
  5. ^ Tsokos, K. A. (28 January 2010). Physics for the IB Diploma Full Colour. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-13821-5. 
  6. ^ Perlin 1999, p. 50.
  7. ^ Perlin 1999, p. 53.
  8. ^ Perlin 1999, p. 54.
  9. ^ Perlin 1999, p. 60.
  10. ^ Reed Business Information (18 October 1979). The multinational connections-who does what where. Reed Business Information. ISSN 02624079. 
  11. ^ $1/W Photovoltaic Systems DOE whitepaper August 2010
  12. ^ a b Solar Stocks: Does the Punishment Fit the Crime?. 24/7 Wall St. (6 October 2011). Retrieved on 3 January 2012.
  13. ^ Parkinson, Giles. "Plunging Cost Of Solar PV (Graphs)". Clean Technica. Retrieved 18 May 2013. 
  14. ^ "T.Bazouni: What is the Fill Factor of a Solar Panel". Retrieved 17 February 2009. 
  15. ^ Vos, A. D. (1980). "Detailed balance limit of the efficiency of tandem solar cells". Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 13 (5): 839. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018.  edit
  16. ^ "Solar cell hits new world record with 44.7 percent efficiency". Retrieved 26 September 2013. 
  17. ^ Hernández-Rodríguez, M.A.; Imanieh, M.H.; Martín, L.L.; Martín, I.R. (September 2013). "Experimental enhancement of the photocurrent in a solar cell using upconversion process in fluoroindate glasses exciting at 1480nm". Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 116: 171–175. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2013.04.023. 
  18. ^ Gupta, N.; Alapatt, G. F.; Podila, R.; Singh, R.; Poole, K. F. (2009). "Prospects of Nanostructure-Based Solar Cells for Manufacturing Future Generations of Photovoltaic Modules". International Journal of Photoenergy 2009: 1. doi:10.1155/2009/154059.  edit
  19. ^ BP Global – Reports and publications – Going for grid parity at the Wayback Machine (archived June 8, 2011). Bp.com. Retrieved on 19 January 2011.
  20. ^ BP Global – Reports and publications – Gaining on the grid. Bp.com. August 2007.
  21. ^ The Path to Grid Parity. bp.com
  22. ^ Peacock, Matt (20 June 2012) Solar industry celebrates grid parity, ABC News.
  23. ^ Baldwin, Sam (20 April 2011) Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy: Challenges and Opportunities. Clean Energy SuperCluster Expo Colorado State University. U.S. Department of Energy.
  24. ^ ENF Ltd. (8 January 2013). "Small Chinese Solar Manufacturers Decimated in 2012 | Solar PV Business News | ENF Company Directory". Enfsolar.com. Retrieved 1 June 2013. 
  25. ^ "Sunny Uplands: Alternative energy will no longer be alternative". The Economist. 21 November 2012. Retrieved 28 December 2012. 
  26. ^ Kim, D.S. et al. (18 May 2003). "String ribbon silicon solar cells with 17.8% efficiency". Proceedings of 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003 2: 1293–1296. ISBN 4-9901816-0-3. 
  27. ^ Wayne McMillan, "The Cast Mono Dilemma", BT Imaging
  28. ^ Pearce, J.; Lau, A. (2002). "Net Energy Analysis for Sustainable Energy Production from Silicon Based Solar Cells". Solar Energy. p. 181. doi:10.1115/SED2002-1051. ISBN 0-7918-1689-3.  edit
  29. ^ Datasheets of the market leaders: First Solar for thin film, Suntech and SunPower for crystalline silicon
  30. ^ a b Fthenakis, Vasilis M. (2004). "Life cycle impact analysis of cadmium in CdTe PV production" (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 (4): 303–334. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.001. 
  31. ^ Yablonovitch, Eli; Miller, Owen D.; Kurtz, S. R. (2012). "The opto-electronic physics that broke the efficiency limit in solar cells". 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. p. 001556. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317891. ISBN 978-1-4673-0066-7. 
  32. ^ Schnitzer, I.; Yablonovitch, E.; Caneau, C.; Gmitter, T. J. (1993). "Ultrahigh spontaneous emission quantum efficiency, 99.7% internally and 72% externally, from Al Ga As/Ga As/Al Ga As double heterostructures". Applied Physics Letters 62 (2): 131. doi:10.1063/1.109348.  edit
  33. ^ Wang, X.; Khan, M. R.; Gray, J. L.; Alam, M. A.; Lundstrom, M. S. (2013). "Design of Ga As Solar Cells Operating Close to the Shockley–Queisser Limit". IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 3 (2): 737. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2241594.  edit
  34. ^ Collins, R. W.; Ferlauto, A. S.; Ferreira, G. M.; Chen, C.; Koh, J.; Koval, R. J.; Lee, Y.; Pearce, J. M.; Wronski, C. R. (2003). "Evolution of microstructure and phase in amorphous, protocrystalline, and microcrystalline silicon studied by real time spectroscopic ellipsometry". Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 78: 143. doi:10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00436-1.  edit
  35. ^ Pearce, J. M.; Podraza, N.; Collins, R. W.; Al-Jassim, M. M.; Jones, K. M.; Deng, J.; Wronski, C. R. (2007). "Optimization of open circuit voltage in amorphous silicon solar cells with mixed-phase (amorphous+nanocrystalline) p-type contacts of low nanocrystalline content". Journal of Applied Physics 101 (11): 114301. doi:10.1063/1.2714507.  edit
  36. ^ Triple-Junction Terrestrial Concentrator Solar Cells. (PDF) . Retrieved on 3 January 2012.
  37. ^ Clarke, Chris (19 April 2011) San Jose Solar Company Breaks Efficiency Record for PV. Optics.org. Retrieved on 19 January 2011.
  38. ^ Oku, Takeo; Kumada, Kazuma; Suzuki, Atsushi; Kikuchi, Kenji (12012). "Effects of germanium addition to copper phthalocyanine/fullerene-based solar cells". Central European Journal of Engineering 2 (2): 248–252. Bibcode:2012CEJE....2..248O. doi:10.2478/s13531-011-0069-7. 
  39. ^ Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. G24i.com (2 April 2014). Retrieved on 20 April 2014.
  40. ^ Semonin, O. E.; Luther, J. M.; Choi, S.; Chen, H.-Y.; Gao, J.; Nozik, A. J.; Beard, M. C. (2011). "Peak External Photocurrent Quantum Efficiency Exceeding 100% via MEG in a Quantum Dot Solar Cell". Science 334 (6062): 1530–3. Bibcode:2011Sci...334.1530S. doi:10.1126/science.1209845. PMID 22174246. 
  41. ^ Kamat, Prashant V. (2012). "Boosting the Efficiency of Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells through Modulation of Interfacial Charge Transfer". Accounts of Chemical Research 45 (11): 120411095315008. doi:10.1021/ar200315d. 
  42. ^ Santra, Pralay K.; Kamat, Prashant V. (2012). "Mn-Doped Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells: A Strategy to Boost Efficiency over 5%". Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (5): 2508–11. doi:10.1021/ja211224s. PMID 22280479. 
  43. ^ Moon, Soo-Jin; Itzhaik, Yafit; Yum, Jun-Ho; Zakeeruddin, Shaik M.; Hodes, Gary; GräTzel, Michael (2010). "Sb2S3-Based Mesoscopic Solar Cell using an Organic Hole Conductor". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 1 (10): 1524. doi:10.1021/jz100308q. 
  44. ^ Solar Cell Research || The Prashant Kamat lab at the University of Notre Dame. Nd.edu (22 February 2007). Retrieved on 17 May 2012.
  45. ^ Genovese, Matthew P.; Lightcap, Ian V.; Kamat, Prashant V. (2012). "Sun-BelievableSolar Paint. A Transformative One-Step Approach for Designing Nanocrystalline Solar Cells". ACS Nano 6 (1): 865–72. doi:10.1021/nn204381g. PMID 22147684. 
  46. ^ Konarka Power Plastic reaches 8.3% efficiency. pv-tech.org. Retrieved on 7 May 2011.
  47. ^ Mayer, A.; Scully, S.; Hardin, B.; Rowell, M.; McGehee, M. (2007). "Polymer-based solar cells". Materials Today 10 (11): 28. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70276-6.  edit
  48. ^ Lunt, R. R.; Bulovic, V. (2011). "Transparent, near-infrared organic photovoltaic solar cells for window and energy-scavenging applications". Applied Physics Letters 98 (11): 113305. doi:10.1063/1.3567516.  edit
  49. ^ Rudolf, John Collins (20 April 2011). "Transparent Photovoltaic Cells Turn Windows Into Solar Panels". green.blogs.nytimes.com. 
  50. ^ "UCLA Scientists Develop Transparent Solar Cell". Enviro-News.com. 24 July 2012. 
  51. ^ Lunt, R. R.; Osedach, T. P.; Brown, P. R.; Rowehl, J. A.; Bulović, V. (2011). "Practical Roadmap and Limits to Nanostructured Photovoltaics". Advanced Materials 23 (48): 5712. doi:10.1002/adma.201103404. PMID 22057647.  edit
  52. ^ Lunt, R. R. (2012). "Theoretical limits for visibly transparent photovoltaics". Applied Physics Letters 101 (4): 043902. doi:10.1063/1.4738896.  edit
  53. ^ Guo, C.; Lin, Y. H.; Witman, M. D.; Smith, K. A.; Wang, C.; Hexemer, A.; Strzalka, J.; Gomez, E. D.; Verduzco, R. (2013). "Conjugated Block Copolymer Photovoltaics with near 3% Efficiency through Microphase Separation". Nano Letters 13 (6): 130522121011001. doi:10.1021/nl401420s.  edit
  54. ^ "Organic polymers create new class of solar energy devices". Kurzweil Accelerating Institute. 31 May 2013. Retrieved 1 June 2013. 
  55. ^ Pv News November 2012. Greentech Media. Retrieved on 3 June 2012.
  56. ^ a b c Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf (September 2013) PV Status Report 2013. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport.
  57. ^ PV production grows despite a crisis-driven decline in investment. European Commission, Brussels, 30 September 2013
  58. ^ PV Status Report 2013 | Renewable Energy Mapping and Monitoring in Europe and Africa (REMEA). Iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu (11 April 2014). Retrieved on 20 April 2014.
  59. ^ Plunging Cost Of Solar PV (Graphs). CleanTechnica (7 March 2013). Retrieved on 20 April 2014.
  60. ^ Falling silicon prices shakes up solar manufacturing industry. Down To Earth (19 September 2011). Retrieved on 20 April 2014.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]