Sonic logging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Well logging
Gamma ray logging
Spontaneous potential logging
Resistivity logging
Density logging
Sonic logging
Caliper logging
Mud logging
LWD/MWD
NMR Logging

Sonic logging is a well logging tool that provides a formation’s interval transit time, designated as {\Delta} t, which is a measure of a formation’s capacity to transmit seismic waves. Geologically, this capacity varies with lithology and rock textures, most notably decreasing with an increasing effective porosity. This means that a sonic log can be used to calculate the porosity of a formation if the seismic velocity of the rock matrix, V_{mat}, and pore fluid, V_l, are known, which is very useful for hydrocarbon exploration.

Process of sonic logging[edit]

Source and receiver relationships for a sonic log

The velocity is calculated by measuring the travel time from the piezoelectric transmitter to the receiver. To compensate for the variations in the drilling mud thickness, there are actually two receivers, one near and one far. This is because the travel time within the drilling mud will be common for both, so the travel time within the formation is given by:

{{\Delta}t} = {t_{far}} - {t_{near}};

where {t_{far}} = travel time to far receiver; {t_{near}} = travel time to near receiver.

If it is necessary to compensate for tool tilt and variations in the borehole width then both up-down and down-up arrays can be used and an average can be calculated. Overall this gives a sonic log that can be made up of 1 or 2 pulse generators and 2 or 4 detectors, all located in single unit called a “sonde”, which is lowered down the well.[1]

An additional way in which the sonic log tool can be altered is increasing or decreasing the separation between the source and receivers. This gives deeper penetration and overcomes the problem of low velocity zones posed by borehole wall damage.

Cycle Skipping[edit]

The returning signal is a wavetrain and not a sharp pulse, so the detectors are only activated at a certain signal threshold. Sometimes, both detectors won’t be activated by the same peak (or trough) and the next peak (or trough) wave will activate one of them instead. This type of error is called cycle skipping and is easily identified because the time difference is equal to the time interval between successive pulse cycles.

Calculating porosity[edit]

Many relationships between travel time and porosity have been proposed, the most commonly accepted is the Wyllie time-average equation. The equation basically holds that the total travel time recorded on the log is the sum of the time the sonic wave spends travelling the solid part of the rock, called the rock matrix and the time spent travelling through the fluids in the pores. This equation is empirical and makes no allowance for the structure of the rock matrix or the connectivity of the pore spaces so extra corrections can often be added to it. The Wyllie time-average equation[2] is:

\frac{1}{V} = \frac{\phi}{V_f} + \frac{1 - {\phi}}{V_{mat}}

where V = seismic velocity of the formation; V_f = seismic velocity of the pore fluid; V_{mat} = seismic velocity of the rock matrix; {\phi} = porosity.

Accuracy[edit]

The accuracy of sonic logs is rather poor, evident by the fact that regular- and long-spaced log measurements often conflict, and this should be taken into account when there are disagreements between seismic data and sonic log data.[1] Other considerations include that the resolution of sonic logs is on a scale of inches whereas seismic reflection data resolution is on the scale of meters, and the two methods use significantly different frequency ranges so travel times will vary due to dispersion.

In order to investigate how the varying size of a borehole has affected a sonic log, the results can be plotted against those of a caliper log.

Use in mineral exploration[edit]

Sonic logs are also used in mineral exploration, especially exploration for iron and potassium.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Sheriff, R. E., Geldart, L. P., (1995), 2nd Edition. Exploration Seismology. Cambridge University Press.
  2. ^ Wyllie, M. R. J., Gregory, A. R. & Gardner, G. H. F. 1958. An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media. Geophysics, 23: 459-93.