The Spivak pronouns are a proposed set of gender-neutral pronouns in English popularized by LambdaMOO based on pronouns used by Michael Spivak. Though not in widespread use, they have been employed in writing for gender-neutral language by some people who dislike the more common alternatives "he/she" or singular they.
Three variants of the Spivak pronouns are in use, highlighted in the declension table below.
|Subject||Object||Possessive Adjective||Possessive Pronoun||Reflexive|
|Masculine||he laughs||I hugged him||his heart warmed||that is his||he loves himself|
|Feminine||she laughs||I hugged her||her heart warmed||that is hers||she loves herself|
|Singular they||they laugh||I hugged them||their heart warmed||that is theirs||they love themself|
|Rogers (1890)||e laughs||I hugged em||es heart warmed|
|Elverson (1975)||ey laughs||I hugged em||eir heart warmed||that is eirs||ey loves emself|
|"anti-Carlton" (1977)||ee laughs||*ees heart warmed||that is *ees||ee loves eeself|
|Tintajl (1977)||em laughs||I hugged em||ems heart warmed||that is ems||em loves emself|
|MacKay (1980)||E laughs||I hugged E||Es heart warmed|
|Spivak (1983)[a]||E laughs||I hugged Em||Eir heart warmed|
|LambdaMOO “spivak” (1991)||e laughs||I hugged em||eir heart warmed||that is eirs||e loves emself|
The original ey has been argued to be preferable to e, because the latter would be pronounced the same as he in those contexts where he, him, his loses its aitch sound.
The precise history of the Spivak pronouns is somewhat unclear, as it would appear they were independently created multiple times, each time likely without knowledge of the previous.
In 1975, Christine M. Elverson of Skokie, Illinois, won a contest by the Chicago Association of Business Communicators to find replacements for "she and he", "him and her", and "his and hers". Her "transgender pronouns" ey, em, and eir were formed by dropping the "th" from they, them, and their. (See 'em.) Notably, the article that first reported the pronouns treated them as something of a joke, concluding with the line, "A contestant from California entered the word 'uh' because 'if it isn't a he or a she, it's uh, something else.' So much of eir humor."
Writing in 1977, poet, playwright, and linguist Lillian Carlton submitted a letter to the journal American Speech reporting (and arguing against) the invention by "an American professor" (likely Dr. Donald MacKay) of pronouns based on "the long sound of the vowel e [[i]]."  Although her primary argument against the proposed word is her assertion that English "already [has] a perfectly good... word that refers to either sex," namely "one," she also raises the observations that "spoken fast, it comes uncomfortably close to the illiterate hisself... [Furthermore], ee sounds too much like he and would therefore be confusing." Similar arguments, along with the desire to distance themselves from the male-centric singular "he" and derivatives, are still a primary factor in the proliferation of constructed pronouns.
Also in 1977, Jeffery J. Smith, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy and Humanities at Stanford University, writing under the pen name "Tintajl jefry," proposed "Em" as "a personal noun-pronoun which in itself gives no indication of sex, age, or number, though these may be shown by its context." He proposes a vast number of possible uses for "em," including but not limited to the replacement of "the formal Dear, because em is a thou word, a term of respect for all people, bar none... Dear Em Doe is redundant. Em Doe is enough, and, since it is brief; it makes room for given names: Em John Doe, Em Mary and John Doe, or, better, Em Doe John, Em Doe John and Mary."
The May 1980 issue of American Psychologist reported on another study by MacKay, testing rates at which subjects miscomprehended the gender of a subject in textbook paragraphs when written with he meaning he or she compared with three epicene pronoun sets: E, E, Es, Eself; e, e, es, eself; and tey, tem, ter, temself.
In 1983, a mathematician-educator, Michael Spivak, wrote an AMS-TeX manual, The Joy of TeX (1983), using E, Em, and Eir. His set was similar to Elverson's, but capitalized like one of MacKay's sets. Writing in 2006, Spivak said:[unreliable source]
|“||The original pronoun set was not created by me. I think I read about it in a newspaper clipping, perhaps from the Boston Globe, during the time I taught at Brandeis, and I believe it was credited to an anthropologist; later on, when I wanted to use it, I was unable to locate the source. In "The Joy of TeX", I wrote "Numerous approaches to this problem have been suggested, but one strikes me as particularly simple and sensible." I assumed people would figure that I was using a construction I couldn't properly credit, and not consider me so immodest as to praise my own invention (though I guess that was a rather immodest assumption).||”|
In May 1991, a MOO programmer, Roger Crew, added "spivak" as a gender setting for players on LambdaMOO, causing the game to refer to such players with the pronouns e, em, eir, eirs, emself. The setting was added along with several other "fake genders" in order to test changes to the software's pronoun code, and was left in place as a novelty. To Crew's surprise, the Spivak setting caught on among the game's players, while the other gender settings were mostly ignored.
Other writers applied Elverson's original “th”-dropping rule and revived “ey”, such as Eric Klein in his legal code for a planned micronation called Oceania. John Williams's Gender-neutral Pronoun FAQ (2004) promoted the original Elverson set (via Klein) as preferable to other major contenders popular on Usenet (singular they, sie/hir/hir/hirs/hirself, and zie/zir/zir/zirs/zirself).
Spivak is one of the allowable genders on many MUDs and MOOs. Others might include some selection of: masculine, feminine, neuter, either, both, "splat" (asterisk), plural, egotistical, royal, and 2nd. The selected gender determines how the game engine refers to a player.
On LambdaMOO, they became standard practice for help texts ("The user may choose any description e likes"), referring to people of unknown gender ("Who was that guest yesterday, eir typing was terrible"), referring to people whose gender was known but without disclosing it ("Yes I've met Squiggle. E was nice."), or of course characters declaring themselves to be of gender Spivak. In recent years (2000 onwards), this usage is declining.
The role-playing game Magical Diary uses spivak pronouns in spell descriptions to refer to the caster, and explains them in an event as a part of magical culture necessitated by interaction with nonhuman species.
Spivak Pronouns and Gender in Virtual Communities
In online anonymous situations, Spivak and other gender neutral pronouns can be motivated by avoiding gendered speech that would make divisions in the social group more likely and the group possibly less productive or enjoyable. This contact with genderless pronouns in virtual communities is sometimes a person's first experience and experimentation with presenting their gender in a genderqueer or transgender manner. Furthermore, the pronouns have been adopted by some to mean not only an unknown gendered hypothetical person as Spivak uses it, but a non-binary identity indicating a known person.
Publications employing Spivak pronouns
Elverson 1975 set (ey, eir, em)
- Carter, CJ (2011-05-26). Que Será Serees: What Will Be, Serees?. CJCS Publishing. ISBN 978-0-615-48304-7.
- Klein, Eric (1993). "Laws of Oceania". Oceania — The Atlantis Project.
- O'Friel, Morgan (2007). Larkenia's Flaws: Volume 1. Grand Rapids: TheSpindle. ISBN 978-0-615-14753-6.
- Edwards, RJ (2009–2014). "Riot Nrrd". Riot Nrrd.
"Spivak" 1991 set (e, eir, em)
- Dibbell, Julian (1999-01-20). my tiny life: crime and passion in a virtual world. Holt Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0-8050-3626-8.
- Hess, Elizabeth (2003). Yib's Guide to MOOing: Getting the Most from Virtual Communities on the Internet. Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4120-0290-5.
- Love, Jane (2000). "Ethics, Plugged and Unplugged: The Pegagogy of Disorderly Conduct". In Inman, James A.; Sewell, Donna N. Taking flight with OWLs: Examining Electronic Writing Center Work. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-8058-3171-1. LCC PE1414.T24 1999.
- Shaviro, Steven (1997). Doom Patrols: A Theoretical Fiction About Postmodernism. London: Serpent's Tail. ISBN 978-1-85242-430-5. LCCN 96068813.
- Spivak, Michael (1990-04-01). The Joy of TeX: A Gourmet Guide to Typesetting with the AMS-TeX Macro Package (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8218-2997-4.[a]
- Thomas, Sue (2004-03-31). Hello World : travels in virtuality. Raw Nerve Books. ISBN 978-0-9536585-6-5.
- The Joy of TeX uses "E", "Em", and "Eir", always capitalized.
- Black, Judie. "Ey Has a Word for It." Chicago Tribune 23 Aug. 1975, sec. 1: 12.
- Carlton, Lillian E. "An Epicene Suggestion." American Speech 54.2 (1979): 156-57. JSTOR. Web. Accessed 31 July 2014. .
- jefry [sic.], Tintajl. "Una: The Emerging Language of the World". (Em Institute 1997), pp. 1-4., cited in Lockheed, Marlaine E. Curriculum and Research for Equity: A Training Manual for Promoting Sex Equity in the Clasroom. Rep. no. Classroom Guide. Washington, DC.: Women's Educational Equity Act Program (ED), 1982. pp. 110-113 
- Anderson, Judy (1992-05-26). "Re: cross-gendered players". Newsgroup: rec.games.mud. Usenet: 1992May26.email@example.com. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.mud/msg/cb352563ae2118ed.
- From 1998 through 2011, LambdaMOO's "help spivak" output described the spivak set as "E - subject", "Em - objective", "Eir - possessive (adjective)", "Eirs - possessive (noun)" and "Emself - reflexive".
- Baron, Dennis E. "The Epicene Pronoun: The Word That Failed." American Speech 56.2 (1981): 83-97. JSTOR. Web. Accessed 27 July 2014.
- Rogers, James "That Impersonal Pronoun." Editorial. Comp. William Henry Hills The Writer Boston. Jan. 1890, 4th ed.: 12-13. Google Books. Google. Web. Accessed 31 July 2014. .
- Scanned clipping from Black, Judie (1975-08-23). "1". "Ey has a word for it". Chicago Tribune. p. 12., published in "Guest Blogger" (2011-07-02). "The Rise of "Transgender"". The Bilerico Project. Retrieved 2011-10-27.
- Martyna, Wendy. "Beyond the "He/Man" Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language." Signs 5.3 (1980): 492. JSTOR. Web. Accessed 31 July 2014. . Citing Donald G. MacKay, "Birth of a Word," manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles. However, if MacKay ever wrote this manuscript, it does not appear on his CV or anywhere else easily discernable.
- MacKay, Donald G. (May 1980). "Psychology, Prescriptive Grammar, and the Pronoun Problem". American Psychologist 35 (5).
- "Michael Spivak in an edit to a Wikipedia article". En.wikipedia.org. Retrieved 2011-11-01.
- Jones, Steve (1998-07-15). CyberSociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-1461-7.
- Moomail from Rog to Lig, 2001-08-26, quoted in Thomas, Sue (March–April 2003). "Spivak". The Barcelona Review (35). Retrieved 2011-10-27.
- Klein, Eric (1993). "Laws of Oceania". Oceania — The Atlantis Project.
- Williams, John (2004). "Gender-neutral Pronoun FAQ".
- Martin, W. Eric. Meta-Gaming 101. Games. Issue 193 (Vol. 27, No. 7). Pg.7. September 2003.
- Herring, Susan. "Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Communication: Bringing Familiar Baggage to the New Frontier." Making the Net*Work: Is There a Z39.50 in Gender Communication? American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami. 27 June 1994. Web. 1 Aug. 2014. <http://urd.let.rug.nl/~welling/cc/gender-differences-communication.pdf>
- Jones, Steven, Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Community and Technology, Sage Publications, Inc., United Kingdom, 1998
- Spivak, Michael. "Personal Pronoun Pronouncement." Preface. The Joy of TEX: A Gourmet Guide to Typesetting with the AMS-TEX Macro Package. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1990. Xv. Print.
|Look up e, ey, em, eir, or eirs in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|