State Partnership Program

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The National Guard State Partnership Program (SPP) was established in 1993 in response to the radically changed political-military situation following the collapse of Communism and the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

The SPP was established following the National Guard Bureau's proposal in the spring of 1993 to pair State National Guards with the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The NGB proposal was prompted by CINCEUR's Jan 93 decision to staff the Military Liaison Teams (MLTs) in the Baltics with Reserve Component personnel, in order to avoid sending a provocative signal to the Russian Federation that could have occurred had active duty soldiers been assigned. The SPP thus began as a bilateral military-to-military contact program to engage the countries of central and Eastern Europe, and is a direct outgrowth of US European Command's Joint Contact Team Program (JCTP). This program has grown far beyond JCTP and is now a key security cooperation tool, facilitating interaction in all aspects of civil-military cooperation.

The program links U.S. states with partner countries for the purpose of supporting the security cooperation objectives of the Combatant Commander. The program's goals reflect an evolving international affairs mission for the National Guard using the unique civil-military nature of the Guard to interact with both active and reserve forces of foreign countries. The State Partners actively participate in a host of engagement activities ranging from bilateral familiarization and could lead to training exercises opportunities, fellowship-style internships, and civic leader visits and medical events. All activities are coordinated through the Theater Combatant Commander and the US Ambassadors' country teams, and other agencies as appropriate, to ensure that National Guard support is tailored to meet both US and country objectives.

The value of the SPP is its ability to focus the attention of a small part of the Department of Defense (DoD)—a State National Guard—with a single country or region in support of US Government policies. This concentrated focus allows for the development of long term personal relationships and a mechanism to catalyze support from outside the DoD which otherwise would not occur but nevertheless complements US policy. The optimum SPP partnership is one in which: the Host Nation professes genuine interest in Partnership; US and Theater engagement objectives are satisfied; the Force Protection risk is acceptable; a minimum of additional resources is required to execute engagement; and National Guard core engagement competencies, particularly military support to civil authority (MSCA), and national defense are heavily incorporated.

Today, 48 U.S. states, two territories, and the District of Columbia are partnered with 63 partner affiliations around the world supporting Geographic Combatant Commands and Chiefs of Mission engagement goals and objectives.

Because of budgetary constraints in today's economy, there are "partnership opportunities" for service clubs, faith-based groups and non-governments organizations (NGO's), to provide logistical support and funding**. Supporting the State Partnership Program comes from many agencies and are coordinated with the help of The Humanitarian Network (www.thehumanitariannetwork.org). Examples of partnership opportunities can be found at www.friendsoflithuania.org, and www.amigosdeperu.org. If organizations are interested in finding out about these programs they should make contact through the above websites.

[edit] Partnerships

AlabamaRomania
AlaskaMongolia
ArizonaKazakhstan
ArkansasGuatemala
CaliforniaNigeria
CaliforniaUkraine
ColoradoSlovenia
Colorado – Jordan
ConnecticutUruguay
Delaware- Trinidad & Tobago
FloridaGuyana
Florida – Venezuela
Florida - Regional Security System
GeorgiaRepublic of Georgia
GuamPhilippines
HawaiiIndonesia
Idaho - Cambodia
IllinoisPoland
IndianaSlovakia
IowaKosovo
KansasArmenia
KentuckyEcuador
LouisianaUzbekistan
Louisiana – Belize
MaineMontenegro
MarylandBosnia-Herzegovina
Maryland – Estonia
MassachusettsParaguay
MichiganLatvia and Liberia (Armed Forces of Liberia) in October 2009[1]
MinnesotaCroatia
MississippiBolivia
MissouriPanama
MontanaKyrgyzstan
TexasCzech Republic
NevadaTurkmenistan
New HampshireEl Salvador
New JerseyAlbania
New YorkSouth Africa
North CarolinaBotswana
North CarolinaMoldova
North DakotaGhana
OhioSerbia
Ohio – Hungary
OklahomaAzerbaijan
OregonBangladesh
PennsylvaniaLithuania
Puerto RicoDominican Republic
Puerto Rico – Honduras
Rhode IslandBahamas
South DakotaSuriname
TennesseeBulgaria
TexasCzech Republic
Texas – Republic of Chile
UtahMorocco
VermontSenegal
Vermont – Republic of Macedonia
VirginiaTajikistan
WashingtonThailand
Washington DCJamaica
West VirginiaPeru
WisconsinNicaragua
WyomingTunisia

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ AFRICOM testimony to Congress

[edit] References

Public Law 111-84 section 1210
Directive Type Memorandum 11-010 of 2011<br)

Public Affairs Factsheet
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export