|A contemporary drawing of Rocket|
|Builder||Robert Stephenson and Company|
|Gauge||4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm)|
|Driver diameter||4 feet 8.5 inches (1.44 m)|
|2 feet 6 inches (0.76 m)|
|Axle load||2 tons, 12 cwt, 1 qtr (2540 kg)|
|Locomotive weight||4 tons, 5 cwt (4320 kg)|
|Boiler pressure||50 psi (0.34 MPa)|
|Cylinder size||8 in × 17 in (203 mm × 432 mm) |
|Top speed||28 miles per hour (45 km/h)|
|Career||Liverpool and Manchester Railway
Lord Carlisle's Railway
|Current owner||Science Museum (London)|
Though the Rocket was not the first steam locomotive, it was the first to bring together several innovations to produce the most advanced locomotive of its day.
It is the most famous example of an evolving design of locomotives by Stephenson that became the template for most steam engines in the following 150 years.
Basic layout 
The locomotive had a tall smokestack chimney at the front, a cylindrical boiler in the middle, and a separate firebox at the rear. The large front pair of wooden wheels was driven by two external cylinders set at an angle. The smaller rear wheels were not coupled to the driving wheels, giving an 0-2-2 wheel arrangement.
Design objectives 
Stephenson designed Rocket for the Rainhill trials, and the specific rules of that contest. As the first railway intended for passengers more than freight, the rules emphasised speed and would require reliability, but the weight of the locomotive was also tightly restricted. Six-wheeled locomotives were limited to six tons, four-wheeled locomotives to four and a half tons. In particular, the weight of the train expected to be hauled was to be three times the actual weight of the locomotive. Stephenson realised that whatever the size of previously successful locomotives, this new contest would favour a fast, light locomotive of only moderate hauling power.
Single pair of driving wheels 
Stephenson's most visible decision was to use a single pair of driving wheels, with a small carrying axle behind. This was the first 0-2-2 and first single driver locomotive.[note 1] The use of single drivers gave several advantages. The weight of coupling rods was avoided and the second axle could be smaller and lightweight, as it only carried a small proportion of the weight. Rocket placed 2½ tons of its 4¼ ton total weight onto its driving wheels, a higher axle load than Sans Pareil, even though the 0-4-0 was heavier overall at 5 ton, and officially disqualified by being over the 4½ ton limit. Early locomotive designers had been concerned that the adhesion of a locomotive's driving wheels would be inadequate, but Stephenson's past experience convinced him that this would not be a problem, particularly with the light trains of the trials contest.
Multiple boiler fire-tubes 
Rocket uses a multi-tubular boiler design. Previous locomotive boilers consisted of a single pipe surrounded by water (though the Lancashire Witch did have twin flues). Rocket has 25 copper fire-tubes that carry the hot exhaust gas from the firebox, through the wet boiler to the blast pipe and chimney. This arrangement resulted in a greatly increased surface contact area of hot pipe with boiler water when compared to a single large flue. Additionally, radiant heating from the enlarged separate firebox helped deliver a further increase in steaming and hence boiler efficiency.
The original innovator of multiple fire-tubes is unclear, between Stephenson and Marc Seguin. It is known than Seguin visited Stephenson to observe Locomotion and that he also built two multi-tubular locomotives of his own design for the Saint-Étienne–Lyon railway before Rocket. Rocket's boiler was of the more highly developed form, with the separate firebox and a blastpipe for draught, rather than Seguin's cumbersome fans, but Rocket was not the first multi-tubular boiler, although it remains unclear just whose invention it was.
The benefits of increasing the fire-tube area had also been attempted with Ericsson and Braithwaite's Novelty at Rainhill. Their design though used a single fire-tube, folded in three. This offered an increased surface area, but only at the cost of a proportionately increased length and so poor draught on the fire. Its arrangement also made tube cleaning impractical.
The advantages of the multiple-tube boiler were quickly recognised, even for heavy, slow freight locomotives. By 1830, Stephenson's past employee Timothy Hackworth had re-designed his return-flued Royal George as the return-tubed Wilberforce class.
Rocket also used a blastpipe, feeding the exhaust steam from the cylinders into the base of the chimney so as to induce a partial vacuum and pull air through the fire. Credit for the invention of the blastpipe is disputed, though Stephenson used it as early as 1814. The blastpipe worked well on the multi-tube boiler of Rocket but on earlier designs with a single flue through the boiler it had created so much suction that it tended to rip the top off the fire and throw burning cinders out of the chimney, vastly increasing the fuel consumption.
Cylinders closer to the horizontal 
Like the Lancashire Witch, Rocket had two cylinders set at angle from the horizontal, with the pistons driving a pair of 4 ft 8.5 in (1.435 m) diameter wheels. Most previous designs had the cylinders positioned vertically, which gave the engines an uneven swaying motion as they progressed along the track. Subsequently Rocket was modified so that the cylinders were set close to horizontal, a layout that influenced nearly all designs that followed.
Cylinders directly connected to driving wheels 
Again like the Lancashire Witch, the cylinders were connected directly to the driving wheels, an arrangement which is found in all subsequent steam locomotives.
Separate firebox 
The firebox was separate from the boiler and was double walled, with a water jacket between them. Stephenson recognised that the hottest part of the boiler, and thus the most effective for evaporating water, was that surrounding the fire itself. This firebox was heated by radiant heat from the glowing coke, not just convection from the hot exhaust gas.
Locomotives of Rocket's era were fired by coke rather than coal. Local landowners were already familiar with the dark clouds of smoke from coal-fired stationary engines and had imposed regulations on most new railways that locomotives would 'consume their own smoke'. The smoke from a burning coke fire was much cleaner than that from coal. It was not until thirty years later and the development of the long firebox and brick arch that locomotives would be effectively able to burn coal directly.
Rocket's first firebox was of copper sheet and of a somewhat triangular shape from the side. The throatplate was of firebrick, possibly the backhead too. When rebuilt around 1831, this was replaced by a wrought iron backhead and throatplate, with a drum wrapper (now missing), presumed to be of copper, between them. This gave a larger internal volume and encouraged better combustion within the firebox, rather than inside the tubes. These early fireboxes formed a separate water space from the boiler drum and were connected by prominent external copper pipes.
Credit for the design 
There have been differences in opinion on who should be given the credit for designing Rocket. George Stephenson had designed several locomotives before but none as advanced as Rocket. At the time that Rocket was being designed and built at the Forth Banks Works, he was living in Liverpool overseeing the building of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. His son Robert had recently returned from a stint working in South America and resumed as managing director of Robert Stephenson and Company. He was in daily charge of designing and constructing the new locomotive. Although he was in frequent contact with his father in Liverpool and probably received advice from him, it is difficult not to give the majority of the credit for the design to Robert. A third person who may deserve a significant amount of credit is Henry Booth, the treasurer of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. He is believed to have suggested to Robert Stephenson that a multi-tube boiler should be used.
Evolution of the Stephenson locomotive design 
Before Rocket 
Rocket was built at a time of rapid development of steam engine technology. It was based on experience gained from earlier designs by George and Robert Stephenson, including the Killingworth locomotive Blücher (1814); Locomotion No 1 (1825); and the Lancashire Witch (1828).
Rocket type locomotives 
Rocket was followed by a number of other engines of similar 0-2-2 layout with rear-mounted cylinders built for the L&MR before it opened in September 1830, culminating in the Northumbrian (1830), by which time the cylinders were horizontal.
After Rocket 
At around the same time, Stephenson experimented with front-mounted cylinders. The unsuccessful 0-4-0 Invicta, built in 1829 immediately after Rocket, still had them at an angle. The successful 2-2-0 locomotive Planet (1830) had internal front-mounted cylinders set to the horizontal.
Operation and subsequent history 
Opening-day accident 
The opening ceremony of the L&MR, on 15 September 1830, was a considerable event, drawing luminaries from the government and industry, including the Prime Minister, the Duke of Wellington. The day started with a procession of eight trains setting out from Liverpool. The parade was led by Northumbrian driven by George Stephenson, and included Phoenix driven by his son Robert, North Star driven by his brother Robert Sr. and Rocket driven by assistant engineer Joseph Locke. The day was marred by the death of William Huskisson, the Member of Parliament for Liverpool, who was struck and killed by Rocket at Parkside.
History between 1830 and 1840 is only vaguely documented. From 1830 to 1834, Rocket served on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway.
Within a few years, the Rocket itself had been much modified to be similar to the Northumbrian class. The cylinders were altered to a near-horizontal position, compared to the angled arrangement as new; the firebox capacity was enlarged and the shape simplified; and the locomotive was given a drum smokebox. These arrangements can be seen in the engine today. Such are the changes in the engine from 1829 that The Engineer magazine, circa 1884, concluded that "it seems to us indisputable that the Rocket of 1829 and 1830 were totally different engines".
Lord Dundonald's rotary engine 
In 1834, the engine was selected for further (unsuccessful) modifications to test a newly-developed rotary steam engine designed by Lord Dundonald. At a cost of nearly £80, Rocket's cylinders and driving rods were removed and two of the engines were installed directly on its driving axle with a feedwater pump in between. On October 22, of that year, an operational trial was held with disappointing results; one witness observing, that "the engine could not be made to draw a train of empty carriages". Due to inherent design flaws and engineering difficulties associated with their design, Dundonald's engines were simply too feeble for the task.
The locomotive still exists, in the Science Museum (London), in much modified form compared to its state at the Rainhill Trials.
In 1923, Buster Keaton had a functioning replica built for the film, Our Hospitality. Two years later, the replica was used again in the Al St. John film, The Iron Mule, directed by Keaton's mentor, Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. The subsequent whereabouts of the replica are unknown. There are, however, at least two other replicas of Rocket in the USA, both built by Robert Stephenson and Hawthorns in 1929, one is at the Henry Ford Museum in the Metro Detroit suburb of Dearborn, Michigan, the other at the Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago.
A cut-away static replica (see photo above) was built in 1935 and displayed for many years next to the original at London's Science Museum, and in 1979 a further, working replica Rocket was built by Locomotion Enterprises for the 150th anniversary celebrations. It has a shorter chimney than the original in order to the clear the bridge at Rainhill: the trackbed is deeper than in the 19th century, giving less headroom. Both of these replicas are now based at the National Railway Museum, York.
See also 
- Although Novelty would also bring a 0-2-2 arrangement to Rainhill
- "Rocket". Rainhilltrials.com. Retrieved 2012-08-22.
- Casserley, H.C. (1960). Historic locomotive pocket book. London: Batsford. pp. 7–8.
- Burton, Anthony (1980). The Rainhill Story. British Broadcasting Corporation. ISBN 0-563-17841-8.
- Snell, J.B. (1973) . Railways: Mechanical Engineering. Arrow. p. 59. ISBN 0-09-908170-9.
- Snell 1971, p. 60
- Bailey, Michael R; Glithero, John P (2000). The Engineering and History of Rocket: A Survey Report. London: Science Museum. p. 17. ISBN 1-900-747-18-9.
- Snell 1971, p. 84
- Snell, J. B. (1971). Railways: Mechanical Engineering. Longman. pp. 55–56. ISBN 0-582-12793-9.
- Smiles, Samuel (1862), "ch 5", The lives of the engineers 3
- Bailey, Michael (2000), The Engineering and History of "Rocket": A Survey Report
- Stephenoson's Rocket 1829 Image
- Snell 1971, p. 61
- Ross, David (2004). The Willing Servant. Tempus. pp. 32–33. ISBN 0-7524-2986-8.
- Webb, Brian; Gordon, David A. (1978). Lord Carlisle's Railways. Lichfield, Staffordshire: Railway Correspondence and Travel Society. p. 101. ISBN 0-901115-43-6.
- Mel Draper. "Engineering and History of Robert Stephenson's Rocket". Homepage.ntlworld.com. Retrieved 2010-11-16.[dead link]
- The Project Gutenberg EBook of Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884, by Various
- Bailey, Michael R; Glithero, John P (2002). The Stephensons' Rocket. York: National Railway Museum/Science Museum. ISBN 978-1-900747-49-3.
- Bailey; Glithero (2000: 35–37)
- Cochrane's Rotary Steam Engines
- Liffen, John (2003). "The Patent Office Museum and the beginnings of railway locomotive preservation". In Lewis, M. J. T. (ed.). Early Railways 2. London: Newcomen Society. pp. 202–20. ISBN 0-904685-13-6.
- Buster Keaton: Interviews, by Buster Keaton, Kevin W. Sweeney
- Internet Movie Database
- Surviving Steam Locomotive Search, steamlocomotive.com
- "Google Image Result for http://www.enuii.org/vulcan_foundry/RS&H/rocket_replica__lner_locomotive_bayardo.jpg". Google.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-11-16.
- [dead link]
- "The only REAL alternative to ebay for collectables online auctions". Specialistauctions.com. 2006-07-06. Retrieved 2010-11-16.
- Satow, M. G. (1979). "Rocket reborn". Railway Magazine 125: 472–4.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Stephenson's Rocket|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Stephenson's Rocket replicas|
- The Science Museum – Stephenson's 'Rocket' locomotive, 1829
- The Engineer magazine examines the differences between the 1829 and 1830 Rocket, as reprinted in Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884.