Structured Analysis and Design Technique

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"SADT" redirects here. For other uses, see SADT (disambiguation).
SADT basis element.

Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT) is a systems engineering and software engineering methodology for describing systems as a hierarchy of functions. SADT is a structured analysis modelling language, which uses two types of diagrams: activity models and data models. It is developed since the late 1960s by Douglas T. Ross, and further formalized and published as IDEF0 in 1981.

Overview[edit]

Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT) is a diagrammatic notation designed specifically to help people describe and understand systems.[1] It offers building blocks to represent entities and activities, and a variety of arrows to relate boxes. These boxes and arrows have an associated informal semantics.[2] SADT can be used as a functional analysis tool of a given process, using successive levels of details. The SADT method not only allows one to define user needs for IT developments, which is often used in the industrial Information Systems, but also to explain and present an activity’s manufacturing processes and procedures.[3]

The SADT supplies a specific functional view of any enterprise by describing the functions and their relationships in a company. These functions fulfill the objectives of a company, such as sales, order planning, product design, part manufacturing, and human resource management. The SADT can depict simple functional relationships here and can reflect data and control flow relationships between different functions.

History[edit]

SADT has been developed and field-tested during the period of 1969 to 1973 by Douglas T. Ross and SofTech, Inc..[1][4] The methodology was used in the MIT Automatic Programming Tool (APT) project. It received extensive use starting in 1973 by the US Air Force Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing program.

According to Levitt (2000) SADT is "part of a series of structured methods, that represent a collection of analysis, design, and programming techniques that were developed in response to the problems facing the software world from the 1960s to the 1980s. In this timeframe most commercial programming was done in COBOL and Fortran, then C and BASIC. There was little guidance on “good” design and programming techniques, and there were no standard techniques for documenting requirements and designs. Systems were getting larger and more complex, and the information system development became harder and harder to do so. As a way to help manage large and complex software.[5]

SADT was among a series of similar structured methods, which had emerged since the 1960 such as:

In 1981 the IDEF0 formalism was published, based on SADT.[6]

SADT topics[edit]

Top down decomposition structure.
An SADT example.

Top down approach[edit]

The structured analysis and design technique uses a decomposition with the top-down approach. This decomposition is conducted only in the physical domain from an axiomatic design viewpoint. Because of this nonzigzagging process, there is no guarantee of functionality or productivity. Therefore, those methods faded away as the requirements for software systems increased and the object-oriented method was introduced.[7]

Diagrams[edit]

SADT uses two types of diagrams: activity models and data models. It uses arrows to build these diagrams. The SADT’s representation is the following:

  • A main box where the name of the process or the action is specified
  • On the left-hand side of this box, incoming arrows: inputs of the action.
  • On the upper part, the incoming arrows: data necessary for the action.
  • On the bottom of the box, incoming arrows: means used for the action.
  • On the right-hand side of the box, outgoing arrows: outputs of the action.

The semantics of arrows for activities:[2]

  • Inputs enter from the left and represent data or consumables that are needed by the activity.
  • Outputs exit from the right and represent data or products that are produced by the activity.
  • Controls enter from the top and represent commands which influence the execution of an activity but are not consumed.
  • Mechanisms identify the means, components or tools used to accomplish the activity. Represents allocation of activities.

The semantics of arrows for data:[2]

  • Inputs are activities that produce the data.
  • Outputs consume the data.
  • Controls influence the internal state of the data.

Roles[edit]

According the Mylopoulos (2004) in the software development process multiple roles can or should be distinguished:[2]

  • Author or developer of the SADT models
  • Commenters, who review the author's work
  • Readers or users of the SADT models
  • Experts, who can advise the authors
  • Technical committee or reviewers of the SADT models in detail
  • Project librarian, who govern the project documentation
  • Project manager, who governs the system analysis and design.
  • Monitor or chief analyst to assists SADT developers and users
  • Instructor to train SADT developers and users

Usage[edit]

SADT is used as diagrammatic notation in conceptual design of software engineering and systems engineering to sketch applications,[2] for more detailed structured analysis, for requirements definition,[8] and structured design.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b D. Marca, C. McGowan, Structured Analysis and Design Technique, McGraw-Hill, 1987, ISBN 0-07-040235-3
  2. ^ a b c d e John Mylopoulos (2004). Conceptual Modelling III. Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT). Retrieved 21 September 2008.
  3. ^ SADT at Free-logisitcs.com. Retrieved 21 September 2008.
  4. ^ D. T. Ross: Structured Analysis (SA): A Language for Communicating Ideas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-3(1), pp. 16-34. Abstract
  5. ^ Dave Levitt (2000):Introduction to Structured Analysis and Design. Retrieved 21 September 2008.
  6. ^ Gavriel Salvendy (2001). Handbook of Industrial Engineering: Technology and Operations Management.. p.508.
  7. ^ Nam Pyo Suh (2007). Axiomatic Design - Advances and Applications. New York : Oxford University Press Chapter 5, pp. 239-298.
  8. ^ Ross, Douglas T., and Kenneth E. Schoman Jr. "Structured analysis for requirements definition." Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 1 (1977): 6-15.

Further reading[edit]

  • William S. Davis (1992). Tools and Techniques for Structured Systems Analysis and Design. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-10274-9
  • Marca, D.A., and C.L. McGowan. (1988). SADT: structured analysis and design technique. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.: New York, NY.
  • Jerry FitzGerald and Ardra F. FitzGerald (1987). Fundamentals of Systems Analysis: Using Structured Analysis and Design Techniques. Wiley. ISBN 0-471-88597-5
  • David A. Marca and Clement L. McGowan (1988). SADT: Structured Analysis and Design Technique. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-040235-3
  • D. Millington (1981). Systems Analysis and Design for Computer Applications. E. Horwood. ISBN 0-85312-249-0
  • Robertson & Robertson (1999). Mastering the Requirements Process. Addison Wesley.
  • James C. Wetherbe (1984). Systems Analysis and Design: Traditional, Structured, and Advanced Concepts and Techniques. West Pub. Co. ISBN 0-314-77858-6

External links[edit]