Breastfeeding is the feeding of an infant or young child with breast milk directly from female human breasts (i.e., via lactation) rather than using infant formula (i.e., via baby bottle). Babies have a sucking reflex that enables them to suck and swallow milk. Experts recommend that children be breastfed within one hour of birth, exclusively breastfed for the first six months, and then breastfed until age two with age-appropriate, nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends for the U.S. that after 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding, babies should continue to breastfeed "for a year and for as long as is mutually desired by the mother and baby". Inadequate nutrition is an underlying cause of the deaths of more than 2.6 million children and over 100,000 mothers every year. Some working mothers express milk to be used while their child is being cared for by others.
Breastfeeding is a very personal decision. Many women have their own beliefs and feelings about whether or not they want to. “The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Dietetic Associating promote breastfeeding as the best source of infant nutrition”. Breastfeeding is a complete nutrition that is easy for the baby to digest, which promotes the child eating more often due to faster digestion. It also helps in the jaw development of the baby; because breastfeeding is more difficult, it helps strengthen the child’s jaw. It also decreases allergies, decreases risk of diabetes and celiac disease and decreases the risk of SIDS. There are also controversial benefits of decreased risk for obesity in adulthood and improved cognitive development. Benefits for the mother include: helps in uterine shrinkage, decreases risk of breast cancer, decreases depression, and decreases risk of osteoporosis. It is also a bonding experience for both mother and baby and can be less expensive than formula.
Breastfeeding was the rule in ancient times up to recent human history, and babies were carried with the mother and fed as required. With 18th and 19th century industrialization in the Western world, mothers in many urban centers began dispensing with breastfeeding due to their work requirements. Breastfeeding declined significantly from 1900 to 1960, due to increasingly negative social attitudes towards the practice and the development of infant formula. From the 1960s onwards, breastfeeding experienced a revival which continues to the 2000s, though some negative attitudes towards the practice still remain.
Today many health authorities consider human breast milk the healthiest form of milk for babies. Breastfeeding promotes the health of both the mother and the infant and helps to prevent disease. Longer breastfeeding has also been associated with better mental health through childhood and into adolescence. Experts agree that breastfeeding is beneficial and have concerns about the effects of artificial formulas. Artificial feeding is associated with more deaths from diarrhea in infants in both developing and developed countries. There are, however, a few exceptions, such as when the mother is taking certain drugs, has active untreated tuberculosis or is infected with human T-lymphotropic virus. The World Health Organization recommends that national authorities in each country decide which infant feeding practice should be promoted and supported by their maternal and child health services to best avoid HIV infection transmission from a mother to her child.
- 1 History
- 2 Organizational endorsements
- 3 Lactation
- 4 Breast milk
- 5 Benefits for the infant
- 5.1 Immunity
- 5.2 Sudden infant death syndrome
- 5.3 Diabetes
- 5.4 Mental health
- 5.5 Childhood obesity
- 5.6 Allergic diseases (atopy)
- 5.7 Necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants
- 5.8 Other long term health effects
- 5.9 Connection to intelligence
- 6 Benefits for mothers
- 7 Methods and considerations
- 7.1 Early breastfeeding
- 7.2 Time and place for breastfeeding
- 7.3 Latching on, feeding, and positioning
- 7.4 Duration of each session
- 7.5 Exclusive breastfeeding
- 7.6 Expressing breast milk
- 7.7 Mixed feeding
- 7.8 Tandem nursing
- 7.9 Shared breastfeeding
- 7.10 Duration of breastfeeding
- 7.11 Diet during breastfeeding
- 7.12 Healthy infant growth
- 7.13 Weaning
- 7.14 Extended breastfeeding
- 8 Breastfeeding difficulties
- 8.1 International board certified lactation consultants
- 8.2 Physiological constraints to breastfeeding
- 8.3 Barriers to breastfeeding
- 8.4 Sociological factors
- 8.5 Breastfeeding in public
- 8.6 Stigma
- 8.7 Role of marketing
- 9 HIV
- 10 Taking medication while breastfeeding
- 11 See also
- 12 References
- 13 Further reading
- 14 External links
In the Egyptian, Greek and Roman empires, women usually fed only their own children. However, breastfeeding began to be seen as something too common to be done by royalty, and wet nurses were employed to breastfeed the children of the royal families. This extended over time, particularly in western Europe, where noble women often made use of wet nurses. But lower class women breastfed their infants and used a wet nurse only if they were unable to feed their own infant. Attempts were made in 15th-century Europe to use cow or goat milk, but these attempts were not successful. In the 18th century, flour or cereal mixed with broth were introduced as substitutes for breastfeeding, but this did not have a favorable outcome either.
During the early 1900s breastfeeding started to be viewed negatively by Western societies, especially in Canada and the USA. These societies considered it a low class and uncultured practice, viewing it with a certain degree of disgust. This coincided with the appearance of improved infant formulas in the mid 19th century and its increased use, which accelerated after World War II. From the 1960s onwards, breastfeeding experienced a revival which continues to the 2000s, though negative attitudes towards the practice were still entrenched up to 1990s.
World Health Organization
|“||The vast majority of mothers can and should breastfeed, just as the vast majority of infants can and should be breastfed. Only under exceptional circumstances can a mother’s milk be considered unsuitable for her infant. For those few health situations where infants cannot, or should not, be breastfed, the choice of the best alternative–expressed breast milk from an infant’s own mother, breast milk from a healthy wet-nurse or a human-milk bank, or a breast-milk substitute fed with a cup, which is a safer method than a feeding bottle and teat–depends on individual circumstances.||”|
The WHO recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, after which "infants should receive nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods while breastfeeding continues up to two years of age or beyond."
National Health Service
|“||Exclusive breastfeeding (giving your baby breast milk only) is recommended for around the first six months (26 weeks) of your baby's life. After that, giving your baby breast milk alongside other food will help them continue to grow and develop. Any amount of breastfeeding has a positive effect. The longer you breastfeed, the longer the protection lasts and the greater the benefits.||”|
American Academy of Pediatrics
|“||Extensive research using improved epidemiologic methods and modern laboratory techniques documents diverse and compelling advantages for infants, mothers, families, and society from breastfeeding and use of human milk for infant feeding. These advantages include health, nutritional, immunologic, developmental, psychologic, social, economic, and environmental benefits.||”|
The AAP recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life. Furthermore, "breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child."
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
One of the most highly effective preventive measures a mother can take to protect the health of her infant is to breastfeed.
According to the CDC, "The success rate among mothers who want to breastfeed can be greatly improved through active support from their families, friends, communities, clinicians, health care leaders, employers, and policymakers. Given the importance of breastfeeding for the health and well-being of mothers and children, it is critical that we take action across the country to support breastfeeding."
The hormonal endocrine control system drives milk production during pregnancy and the first few days after the birth. From the twenty-fourth week of pregnancy (the second and third trimesters), a woman's body produces hormones that stimulate the growth of the milk duct system in the breasts. Progesterone influences the growth in size of alveoli and lobes; high levels of progesterone, estrogen, prolactin, and other hormones inhibit lactation before birth; hormone levels drop after birth, triggering the onset of milk production. After birth, the hormone oxytocin contracts the smooth muscle layer of cells surrounding the alveoli to squeeze milk into the duct system. Oxytocin is also necessary for the milk ejection reflex, or let-down to occur. Let down occurs in response to the baby's suckling, though it also may be a conditioned response, e.g. to the cry of the baby. Lactation can also be induced by a combination of physical and psychological stimulation, by drugs, or by a combination of these methods.
Not all the properties of breast milk are understood, but its nutrient content is relatively stable. Breast milk is made from nutrients in the mother's bloodstream and bodily stores. Breast milk has just the right amount of fat, sugar, water, and protein that is needed for a baby's growth and development. Breastfeeding triggers biochemical reactions which allows for the enzymes, hormones, growth factors and immunologic substances to help create effective defense to infectious diseases for the infant. The breastmilk also has long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids which help with normal retinal and neural development. Because breastfeeding uses an average of 500 calories a day, it helps the mother lose weight after giving birth. The composition of breast milk changes depending on how long the baby nurses at each session, as well as on the age of the child.
The quality of a mother's breast milk may be compromised by smoking, alcoholic beverages, caffeinated drinks, marijuana, methamphetamine, heroin, and methadone. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics states that "Tobacco smoking by mothers is not a contraindication to breastfeeding." In addition, the AAP states that while breastfeeding mothers "should avoid the use of alcoholic beverages," an "occasional celebratory single, small alcoholic drink is acceptable, but breastfeeding should be avoided for 2 hours after the drink."
Benefits for the infant
Scientific research, such as the studies summarized in a 2007 review for the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and a 2007 review for the WHO, have found numerous benefits of breastfeeding for the infant. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, research shows that breast feeding provides advantages with regard to general health, growth, and development. Infants who are not breastfed are at a significantly increased risk for a large number of acute and chronic diseases including lower respiratory infection, ear infections, bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, botulism, urinary tract infection, and necrotizing enterocolitis. They state that there are a number of studies that show a possible protective effect of breast milk feeding against sudden infant death syndrome, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, lymphoma, allergic diseases, digestive diseases, and a possible enhancement of cognitive development.
During breastfeeding, approximately 0.25-0.5 grams per day of secretory IgA antibodies pass to the baby via the milk. This is one of the most important features of colostrum, the breast milk created for newborns. The main target for these antibodies are probably microorganisms in the baby's intestine. There is some uptake of IgA to the rest of the body, but this amount is relatively small. Also, breast milk contains several anti-infective factors such as bile salt stimulated lipase (protecting against amoebic infections) and lactoferrin (which binds to iron and inhibits the growth of intestinal bacteria).
Among the studies showing that non-breastfed infants have a higher risk of infection than breastfed infants are:
- In a 1993 University of Texas Medical Branch study, a longer period of breastfeeding was associated with a shorter duration of some middle ear infections (otitis media with effusion) in the first two years of life.
- A 1995 study of 87 infants found that breastfed babies had half the incidence of diarrheal illness, 19% fewer cases of any otitis media (middle ear) infections, and 80% fewer prolonged cases of middle ear infections than formula fed babies in the first twelve months of life.
- Breastfeeding appeared to reduce symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in premature infants up to seven months after release from hospital in a 2002 study of 39 infants.
- A 2004 case-control study found that breastfeeding reduced the risk of acquiring urinary tract infections in infants up to seven months of age, with the protection strongest immediately after birth.
- The 2007 review for AHRQ found that breastfeeding reduced the risk of acute otitis media, non-specific gastroenteritis, and severe lower respiratory tract infections.
Maternal vaccination while breastfeeding
In a review article published in the journal Pediatrics, data from 2001 to 2012 were analyzed to discern any safety issue for mothers being vaccinated while breastfeeding. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) concludes that it is safe for women to receive almost all vaccines while nursing their infants. The study further found that the protected immunity of the mother obtained by vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough and influenza can pass on to the baby, and that breastfeeding can reduce fever rate after infant immunization. Exceptions are smallpox and yellow fever vaccines which increase the risk of infants developing vaccinia and encephalitis. In all other cases AAP recommends women continue breastfeeding after vaccination.
Sudden infant death syndrome
Formula fed babies have worse arousal from sleep at 2–3 months. This coincides with the peak incidence of sudden infant death syndrome. A study conducted at the University of Münster found that formula feeding doubled the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in children up to the age of 1.
Infants exclusively breastfed have less chance of developing diabetes mellitus type 1 than those with a shorter duration of breastfeeding and an earlier exposure to cow milk and solid foods. Breastfeeding also appears to protect against diabetes mellitus type 2, at least in part due to its effects on the child's weight.
Breastfeeding for more than 6 months is an independent predictor of better mental health through childhood and adolescence according to a large 2009 study. The more months children were breastfed the less likely they were to suffer from depression, delinquent behavior, attention issues and other psychological problems. Breastfeeding also improves cognitive development according to a number of other studies.
The beneficial effects seem to stem in large part from the unique composition of human milk which, compared to formula milk, has been shown to lead to improved motor and cognitive development in pre-term babies as well.
Breastfeeding appears to reduce the risk of extreme obesity in children. The protective effect of breastfeeding against obesity is consistent, though small, across many studies, and appears to increase with the duration of breastfeeding.
Another study has shown that infants who are bottle-fed in early infancy are more likely to empty the bottle or cup in late infancy than those who are breastfed. "Bottle-feeding, regardless of the type of milk, is distinct from feeding at the breast in its effect on infants' self-regulation of milk intake." According to the study, this may be due to one of three possible factors, including that when bottle feeding, parents may encourage an infant to finish the contents of the bottle whereas when breastfeeding, an infant naturally develops self-regulation of milk intake. A study in Today's Pediatrics associates solid food given too early to formula-fed babies before 4 months old to making them 6 times as likely to become obese by age 3. It does not happen if the babies were given solid foods along with breast feeding.
Allergic diseases (atopy)
In children who are at risk for developing allergic diseases (defined as at least one parent or sibling having atopy), atopic syndrome can be prevented or delayed through exclusive breastfeeding for four months, though these benefits may not be present after four months of age. However, the key factor may be the age at which non-breastmilk is introduced rather than duration of breastfeeding. Atopic dermatitis, the most common form of eczema, can be reduced through exclusive breastfeeding beyond 12 weeks in individuals with a family history of atopy, but when breastfeeding beyond 12 weeks is combined with other foods incidents of eczema rise irrespective of family history.
Necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an acute inflammatory disease in the intestines of infants. Necrosis or death of intestinal tissue may follow. It is mainly found in premature births. In one study of 926 preterm infants, NEC developed in 51 infants (5.5%). The death rate from necrotizing enterocolitis was 26%. NEC was found to be six to ten times more common in infants fed formula exclusively, and three times more common in infants fed a mixture of breast milk and formula, compared with exclusive breastfeeding. In infants born at more than 30 weeks, NEC was twenty times more common in infants fed exclusively on formula. A 2007 meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials found "a marginally statistically significant association" between breastfeeding and a reduction in the risk of NEC.
Other long term health effects
Although one study showed no evidence that breastfeeding offers protection against allergies, another study showed a positive correlation between breastfeeding and a lower risk of asthma. This study also showed that breastfeeding protects against allergies, and respiratory and intestinal infections.
A review of the association between breastfeeding and celiac disease (CD) concluded that breast feeding while introducing gluten to the diet reduced the risk of CD. The study was unable to determine if breastfeeding merely delayed symptoms or offered lifelong protection.
According to the findings of a study conducted at the University of Wisconsin, women who were breastfed as infants may have a lower risk of developing breast cancer than those who were not breastfed.
Breastfeeding may decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in later life, as indicated by lower cholesterol and C-reactive protein levels in adult women who had been breastfed as infants. Although a 2001 study suggested that adults who had been breastfed as infants had lower arterial distensibility than adults who had not been breastfed as infants, the 2007 review for the WHO concluded that breastfed infants "experienced lower mean blood pressure" later in life. A 2007 review for the AHRQ found that "there is an association between a history of breastfeeding during infancy and a small reduction in adult blood pressure, but the clinical or public health implication of this finding is unclear". A 2006 study found that breastfed babies are better able to cope with stress later in life.
In a paper selected by UNICEF as the “Breastfeeding Paper of the Month” it was suggested that breastfed babies have a better chance of good dental health than artificially fed infants because of the effects of breastfeeding on the development of the oral cavity and airway. It was thought that with fewer malocclusions, breastfed children may have a reduced need for orthodontic intervention. The report also suggested that children with the proper development of a well rounded, "U-shaped" dental arch, which is found more commonly in breastfed children, may have fewer problems with snoring and sleep apnea in later life.
Connection to intelligence
Studies have examined whether breastfeeding in infants is associated with higher intelligence later in life. Possible association between breastfeeding and intelligence is not clear. The 2007 review for the AHRQ found "no relationship between breastfeeding in term infants and cognitive performance" and in 2006, a prospective cohort study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis, concluded that "Breast feeding has little or no effect on intelligence in children." The researchers found that "Most of the observed association between breast feeding and cognitive development is the result of confounding by maternal intelligence."
However a 2007 review for the World Health Organization "suggests that breastfeeding is associated with increased cognitive development in childhood." The review also states that "The issue remains of whether the association is related to the properties of breastmilk itself, or whether breastfeeding enhances the bonding between mother and child, and thus contributes to intellectual development." A 2005 study using data on 2,734 sibling pairs from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health "provide[d] persuasive evidence of a causal connection between breastfeeding and intelligence." In another study, cited as "the largest randomized trial ever conducted in the area of human lactation," between 1996 and 1997 maternity hospitals and polyclinics in Belarus were randomized to receive or not receive breastfeeding promotion modeled on the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. Of 13,889 infants born at these hospitals and polyclinics and followed up in 2002–2005, those who had been born in hospitals and polyclinics receiving breastfeeding promotion had IQs that were 2.9–7.5 points higher (which was significantly higher). Since (among other reasons) a randomized trial should control for maternal IQ, the authors concluded in a 2008 paper that the data "provide strong evidence that prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding improves children's cognitive development." Further research in 2013 has supported this theory. One 2013 imaging study indicated that breastfed children experience 15-34% enhanced brain white matter development.
In 2007, A. Caspi et al. published a study “Moderation of breastfeeding effects on the IQ by genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism.” The authors noted that there is currently agreement in the scientific community that both genetic and environmental factors effect specific traits rather than one or another. This fact inspired them to try to find a gene that mediates the well-researched phenomenon that children who are breast-fed have higher IQ. In their study they found that babies with a specific version of the FADS2 gene demonstrated an IQ averaging 7 points higher if breastfed, compared with babies with a less common version of the gene who showed no improvement when breastfed. FADS2 affects the metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids found in human breast milk, such as docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid, which are known to be linked to early brain development. The researchers said "Our findings support the idea that the nutritional content of breast milk accounts for the differences seen in human IQ. But it's not a simple all-or-none connection: it depends to some extent on the genetic makeup of each infant" and, "further investigation to replicate and explain this specific gene–environment interaction is warranted."
However, an attempt to replicate this study in 5934 eight-year-old children failed: No relationship of the common C allele to negative effects of formula feeding was apparent, and contra to the original report, the rare GG homozygote children performed worse when formula fed than other children on formula milk. Another study of over 700 families also criticized the Caspi et al. study. The study reported no evidence for either main or moderating effects of the original SNP (rs174575), nor of two additional FADS2 polymorphisms (rs1535 and rs174583), nor any effect of maternal FADS2 status on offspring IQ.
Benefits for mothers
Breastfeeding is a cost-effective way of feeding an infant, providing nourishment for a child at a small cost to the mother. Frequent and exclusive breastfeeding usually delays the return of fertility through lactational amenorrhea, though breastfeeding is an imperfect means of birth control. During breastfeeding beneficial hormones are released into the mother's body and the maternal bond can be strengthened. Breastfeeding is possible throughout pregnancy, but generally milk production will be reduced at some point. Children who are not breastfed are almost six times more likely to die by the age of one month than children who receive at least some breastmilk.
According to some authorities, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that early skin-to-skin contact (also called kangaroo care) of mother and baby stimulates breast feeding behavior in the baby. Newborn infants who are immediately placed on their mother’s skin have a natural instinct to latch on to the breast and start nursing, typically within one hour of being born. It is thought that immediate skin-to-skin contact provides a form of imprinting that makes subsequent feeding significantly easier. The World Health Organization reports that in addition to more successful breastfeeding, skin-to-skin contact between a mother and her newborn baby immediately after delivery also reduces crying, improves mother to infant interaction, and keeps baby warm. According to studies quoted by UNICEF, babies have been observed to naturally follow a unique process which leads to a first breastfeed. Initially after birth the baby will cry as they take their first breaths. Shortly after, it will relax and begin to make small movements of the arms, shoulders and head. The baby will crawl towards the breast and begin to feed. After feeding, it is normal for a baby to remain attached to the breast while it rests. This is sometimes confused for the baby not being hungry, however it is a normal thing for the baby to do after finding their food source. Providing that there are no interruptions, all babies are said to follow this process and it is suggested that trying to rush the process or interruptions such as removing the baby to weigh him/her is counter-productive and may lead to problems at subsequent breastfeeds.
Hormones released during breastfeeding help to strengthen the maternal bond. Teaching partners how to manage common difficulties is associated with higher breastfeeding rates. Support for a mother while breastfeeding can assist in familial bonds and help build a paternal bond between father and child.
If the mother is away, an alternative caregiver may be able to feed the baby with breast milk expressed with a breast pump.
Breastfeeding releases oxytocin and prolactin, hormones that relax the mother and make her feel more nurturing toward her baby. This hormone release can help to enable sleep even where a mother may otherwise be having difficulty sleeping. Breastfeeding soon after giving birth increases the mother's oxytocin levels, making her uterus contract more quickly and reducing bleeding. Pitocin, a synthetic hormone used to make the uterus contract during and after labour, is structurally modelled on oxytocin. Syntocinon, another synthetic oxytocic, is commonly used in Australia and the UK rather than Pitocin.
As the fat accumulated during pregnancy is used to produce milk, extended breastfeeding—at least 6 months—can help mothers lose weight. However, weight loss is highly variable among lactating women; monitoring the diet and increasing the amount/intensity of exercise are more reliable ways of losing weight. The 2007 review for the AHRQ found "The effect of breastfeeding in mothers on return-to-pre-pregnancy weight was negligible, and the effect of breastfeeding on postpartum weight loss was unclear."
Dramatic changes occur in a pregnant woman’s metabolism and body composition as she accommodates the demands of providing for the nutritional needs of the growing fetus, and metabolizing for two. In anticipation of lactation, the mother accumulates some stores of visceral fat, but most of it is stored as subcutaneous fat in the thighs, arms, buttocks, and breasts. This shift in fat content leads to increased insulin production, insulin resistance, and circulating lipid levels in the mother. Studies have indicated that gestational weight gain (GWG) may contribute to complications during labor and delivery and it is the most reliable factor in predicting postpartum weight retention (PPWR). In general, the more weight that women put on during pregnancy, the more weight that they retain afterward. Interventions to restrain GWG in the United States and elsewhere have had mixed results in reducing PPWR. The recent recognition of PPWR’s influence on later chronic diseases has brought a surge in data analysis. In fact, the proportion of US women who gain weight excessively during pregnancy is growing. In 2005, 20.6% gained 18.2 kg (40 lb), the upper limit recommended by the Institute of Medicine. Recommended weight gains during pregnancy vary according to maternal baseline characteristics. The Institute of Medicine has established guidelines where women who are underweight (BMI less than 18.5) are encouraged to gain 13 to 18 kg; women who are at normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) are encouraged to gain 11–16 kg; those who are overweight (BMI 25-29.9) are suggested to gain 7–11 kg; and those who are obese I (BMI 30-34.9) are recommended to gain 5–9 kg. These recommendations are variable and are meant to inform an obstetrician in caring for a pregnant woman. Extreme gains in visceral fat can put women at higher risk of cardiovascular and glycemic disorders later in life.
After birth, the fat stores created during pregnancy are primed to be metabolized through lactation. Several investigators have explored the relation between duration of lactation and postpartum weight change, and found a variety of outcomes. Overall, it has been observed that prolonged exclusivity of breastfeeding is associated with increased weight loss when controlling for gestational weight gain and postpartum caloric intake and expenditure. Dietary intake and energy expenditure affect how much weight women lose with lactation. When nutrition is readily available, women compensate for increased energy demands by increasing intake and decreasing energy expenditure, rather than mobilizing fat stores. Fat mobilization appears to increase after the first 3 months postpartum, reflecting changes in the hormonal effects of lactation on maternal appetite as frequency of infant feeds decreases. Some findings suggest that formula-feeding mothers during the first two months postpartum consume 600 to 800 fewer calories than breast-feeding mothers and lost substantially more weight. From 3 to 6 months post-partum, however, weight loss among breast-feeding women increased substantially. These results suggest that in the early postpartum period, well-nourished women in developed nations tend to increase energy intake and/or decrease physical activity to meet the energy demands of lactation, whereas beyond 3 months, lactating women are more likely to mobilize fat stores. Longitudinal studies using skinfold thickness and MRI scanning of adipose tissue during pregnancy and lactation consistently show fat accumulation in the thigh and buttocks regions during pregnancy, with mobilization from these areas postpartum. These studies have indicated that lactation is associated with reduction in subcutaneous fat levels and overall body weight.
Long-term effects of lactation on health and body composition
Recent data suggests that lactation is associated with a reduced risk in chronic diseases such as type-2 diabetes and heart disease. The long-term effects of lactation on body composition vary, and seem to be influenced by socioeconomic factors. Studies have consistently indicated that lactation helps prepare the mother’s body for subsequent pregnancies and reduces complications in later periods of gestation and birth. Further research is needed to examine the long-term effects of lactation on maternal body composition and risk for chronic disease.
Natural postpartum infertility
Breastfeeding may delay the return to fertility for some women by suppressing ovulation. A breastfeeding woman may not ovulate, or have regular periods, during the entire lactation period. The period in which ovulation is absent differs for each woman. This lactational amenorrhea has been used as an imperfect form of natural contraception, with greater than 98% effectiveness during the first six months after birth if specific nursing behaviors are followed. It is possible for women to ovulate within two months after birth while fully breastfeeding and get pregnant again.
Long-term health effects
For breastfeeding women, long-term health benefits include:
- Less risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer.
- A 2009 study indicated that lactation for at least 24 months is associated with a 23% lower risk of coronary heart disease.
- Although the 2007 review for the AHRQ found "no relationship between a history of lactation and the risk of osteoporosis", mothers who breastfeed longer than eight months benefit from bone re-mineralisation.
- Breastfeeding diabetic mothers require less insulin.
- Reduced risk of metabolic syndrome
- Reduced risk of post-partum bleeding.
- According to a Malmö University study published in 2009, women who breast fed for a longer duration have a lower risk for contracting rheumatoid arthritis than women who breast fed for a shorter duration or who had never breast fed.
- According to a Spanish study published in the Journal of Clinical Nursing, breastfeeding for over six months would produce a decrease in oestroegen level and protect women against breast cancer and delay the onset of the disease by 10 years.
The American Academy of Pediatrics states that breast feeding also has economic health benefits because breastfeeding results in reduced health care costs. The significantly lower incidence of illness in the breastfed infant also allows the parents more time for attention to siblings and other family duties and reduces parental absence from work and lost income. Using figures for the year 1993, it was estimated that the cost of purchasing infant formula for the first year after birth was $855. During the first 6 weeks of lactation, maternal caloric intake is no greater for the breastfeeding mother than for the nonlactating mother. After that period, food and fluid intakes are greater, but the cost of the increased caloric intake is about half the cost of purchasing formula, resulting in a saving of about $400.
Methods and considerations
There are many books and videos to advise mothers about breastfeeding. Lactation consultants in hospitals or private practice, and volunteer organizations of breastfeeding mothers such as La Leche League International also provide advice and support.
In the half hour after birth, the baby's suckling reflex is strongest, and the baby is more alert, so it is the ideal time to start breastfeeding. Breastfeeding also releases hormones that contract the uterus to reduce post-partum bleeding. Early breastfeeding is associated with fewer nighttime feeding problems. A Cochrane review found that early skin-to-skin contact between mother and baby (placing the baby at the mother's breast before dressing the baby) reduces crying, improves mother-baby interaction, keeps the baby warmer, and helps women breastfeed successfully and for a longer period of time.
Time and place for breastfeeding
Feeding a baby "on demand" (sometimes referred to as "on cue"), means feeding when the baby shows signs of hunger. Newborn babies usually express demand for feeding every 1 to 3 hours per 24 hours (resulting in 8-12 times in 24 hours) for the first two to four weeks.
"Experienced breastfeeding mothers learn that the sucking patterns and needs of babies vary. While some infants' sucking needs are met primarily during feedings, other babies may need additional sucking at the breast soon after a feeding even though they are not really hungry. Babies may also nurse when they are lonely, frightened or in pain."
"Comforting and meeting sucking needs at the breast is nature's original design. Pacifiers (dummies, soothers) are a substitute for the mother when she cannot be available. Other reasons to pacify a baby primarily at the breast include superior oral-facial development, prolonged lactational amenorrhea, avoidance of nipple confusion, and stimulation of an adequate milk supply to ensure higher rates of breastfeeding success."
Most US states now have laws that allow a mother to breastfeed her baby anywhere she is allowed to be. In hospitals, rooming-in care permits the baby to stay with the mother and improves the ease of breastfeeding. Some commercial establishments provide breastfeeding rooms, although laws generally specify that mothers may breastfeed anywhere, without requiring them to go to a special area.
In 2014, newly elected Pope Francis drew world-wide commentary when he encouraged mothers to breastfeed in church if their babies were hungry. During a special papal baptism Pope Francis said that mothers "should not stand on ceremony" if their children were hungry. "If they are hungry, mothers, feed them, without thinking twice," he said, smiling. "Because they are the most important people here."
Latching on, feeding, and positioning
Correct positioning and technique for latching on are necessary to prevent nipple soreness and allow the baby to obtain enough milk. The "rooting reflex" is the baby's natural tendency to turn towards the breast with the mouth open wide; mothers sometimes make use of this by gently stroking the baby's cheek or lips with their nipple to induce the baby to move into position for a breastfeeding session, then quickly moving the baby onto the breast while its mouth is wide open. To prevent nipple soreness and allow the baby to get enough milk, a large part of the breast and areola need to enter the baby's mouth. Failure to latch on is one of the main reasons for ineffective feeding and can lead to infant health concerns.
A 2006 study found that inadequate parental education, incorrect breastfeeding techniques, or both were associated with higher rates of preventable hospital re-admissions of newborns.
Duration of each session
During the newborn period, most breastfeeding sessions will take from 20 to 45 minutes. After the finishing of a breast, the mother may offer the other breast.
Exclusive breastfeeding is defined as "an infant's consumption of human milk with no supplementation of any type (no water, no juice, no nonhuman milk, and no foods) except for vitamins, minerals, and medications." National and international guidelines recommend that all infants be breastfed exclusively for the first six months of life. Breastfeeding may continue with the addition of appropriate foods, for two years or more. Exclusive breastfeeding has dramatically reduced infant deaths in developing countries by reducing diarrhea and infectious diseases. It has also been shown to reduce HIV transmission from mother to child, compared to mixed feeding.
While it can be hard to measure how much food a breastfed baby consumes, babies normally feed to meet their own requirements. Babies that fail to eat enough may exhibit symptoms of failure to thrive.
The La Leche League says that their most often asked question is, "How can I tell if my baby is getting enough milk?" They advise that for the first few days while the baby is receiving mostly colostrum only one or two wet diapers per day is normal. Once the mother's milk comes in, usually on the third or fourth day, the baby should begin to have 6-8 wet cloth diapers (5-6 wet disposable diapers) per day. In addition, most young babies will have at least two to five bowel movements every 24 hours for the first several months.
The La Leache League gives the following additional signs that indicate a baby is receiving enough milk:
- The baby nurses frequently averaging at least 8-12 feedings per 24-hour period.
- The baby is allowed to determine the length of the feeding, which may be 10 to 20 minutes per breast or longer.
- Baby's swallowing sounds are audible as he is breastfeeding.
- The baby should gain at least 4-7 ounces per week after the fourth day of life.
- The baby will be alert and active, appear healthy, have good color, firm skin, and will be growing in length and head circumference.
Expressing breast milk
When direct breastfeeding is not possible, a mother can express (artificially remove and store) her milk. With manual massage or by using a breast pump, a woman can express her milk and store it. It can be stored in freezer storage bags and containers made specifically for breastmilk, a supplemental nursing system, or a bottle ready for use. Breast milk may be kept at room temperature for up to six hours, refrigerated for up to eight days or frozen for up to six to twelve months. Research suggests that the antioxidant activity in expressed breast milk decreases over time but it still remains at higher levels than in infant formula.
Expressing breast milk can maintain a mother's milk supply when she and her child are apart. If a sick baby is unable to feed, expressed milk can be fed through a nasogastric tube.
Expressed milk can also be used when a mother is having trouble breastfeeding. Hand expression of breast milk, together with manual massage while pumping has been shown to maximize a mother's milk supply.
"Exclusively expressing", "exclusively pumping", and "EPing" are terms for a mother who feeds her baby exclusively her breastmilk while not physically breastfeeding. This may arise because her baby is unable or unwilling to latch on to the breast. With good pumping habits, particularly in the first 12 weeks when the milk supply is being established, it is possible to produce enough milk to feed the baby for as long as the mother wishes.
It is generally advised to delay using a bottle to feed expressed breast milk until the baby is 4–6 weeks old and is good at sucking directly from the breast. As sucking from a bottle takes less effort, babies can lose their desire to suck from the breast. This is called nursing strike or nipple confusion. To avoid this when feeding expressed breast milk (EBM) before 4–6 weeks of age, it is recommended that breast milk be given by other means such as feeding spoons or feeding cups. Also, EBM should be given by someone other than the breastfeeding mother (or wet nurse), so that the baby can learn to associate direct feeding with the mother (or wet nurse) and associate bottle feeding with other people.
With the improvements in breast pumps, many women are able to return to work while exclusively feeding their infants breast milk because of their ability to express milk at work. Women can also leave their infants in the care of others for vacation or other extended trips, while maintaining a supply of breast milk. This can be very convenient to the mother.
Some women donate their expressed breast milk (EBM) to others, either directly or through a milk bank. Though historically the use of wet nurses was common, some women dislike the idea of feeding their own child with another woman's milk; others appreciate being able to give their baby the benefits of breast milk. Feeding expressed breast milk—either from donors or the baby's own mother—is the feeding method of choice for premature babies. The transmission of some viral diseases through breastfeeding can be prevented by expressing breast milk and subjecting it to Holder pasteurisation.
Predominant or mixed breastfeeding means feeding breast milk along with infant formula, baby food and even water, depending on the age of the child. Babies feed differently with artificial nipples than from a breast. With the breast, the infant's tongue massages the milk out rather than sucking, and the nipple does not go as far into the mouth; with an artificial nipple, an infant must suck harder and the milk may come in more rapidly. Therefore, mixing breastfeeding and bottle-feeding (or using a pacifier) before the baby is used to feeding from its mother can result in the infant preferring the bottle to the breast. Some mothers supplement feed with a small syringe or flexible cup to reduce the risk of artificial nipple preference.
Feeding two children at the same time who are not twins or multiples is called tandem nursing. As the appetite and feeding habits of each baby may not be the same, this could mean feeding each according to their own individual needs and can also include breastfeeding them together, one on each breast.
In cases of triplets or more, it is a challenge for a mother to organize feeding around the appetites of all the babies. Breasts can respond to the demand and produce large quantities of milk; mothers have been able to breastfeed triplets successfully.
Tandem nursing occurs when a woman has a baby while breastfeeding an older child. During the late stages of pregnancy, the milk will change to colostrum, and some older nurslings will continue to feed even with this change, while others may wean due to the change in taste or drop in supply. Breastfeeding a child while being pregnant with another can also be considered a form of tandem feeding for the nursing mother, as she also provides the nutrition for two.
It used to be common worldwide, and still is in some developing nations such as those found in Africa, for more than one woman to breastfeed a child. Shared breastfeeding has now been found to be a risk factor for HIV infection in infants. A woman who is engaged to breastfeed another's baby is known as a wet nurse. Shared breastfeeding can sometimes incur negative reactions in the Anglosphere; American feminist activist Jennifer Baumgardner has written about her experiences in New York with this issue.
Duration of breastfeeding
The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the baby's first 6 months of life, and continued breastfeeding complemented with appropriate foods up to two years old and beyond. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends exclusive breastfeeding till six months of age.
However, according to a study conducted by the CDC, the results of which were published in the journal Pediatrics, as of 2013 in the USA reliance on out-dated recommendations and considerations of convenience and cost sometimes resulted in inappropriate earlier attempts to switch to solid food. As such, their latest figures (2008) show that 76.9% of US women had ever breastfed but only 47.2% were still breastfeeding at six months and 25.5% at twelve months. Figures for exclusive breastfeeding at three months were 36% and at six months only 16.3%.
In many Western countries, however, breastfeeding beyond the age of 1 year old is considered "extended breastfeeding".
These movements in the West towards earlier weaning, however, are recent. Breastfeeding beyond the age of 1 year old was at one time a very common practice worldwide. Dr. Martin Stein wrote in Parental Concerns about Extended Breastfeeding in a Toddler that "The discussion about extended nursing is similar to that of co-sleeping. They are both characteristics of child rearing that are closely linked to time and place. In most cultures before the 20th century, both practices were the norm. Changes in social, economic, and sexual expectations altered our views of the meaning of breastfeeding and bed sharing." Extended breastfeeding was encouraged in Ancient Greek, Hebrew, and Muslim cultures. The Koran, the Talmud, and the writings of Aristotle all recommend breastfeeding for 2 to 3 years. In Breastfeeding Beyond 6 Months: Mothers' Perceptions of the Negative and Positive Consequences, Dr. S. B. Reamer states that "Over the past 100 years of American history, the acceptance of unrestricted nursing decreased and the age acceptable for weaning dropped dramatically, until the average weaning age was 3 months in the 1970s."
In reaction to the move in the West towards earlier weaning, several organizations have been founded in Western countries to support mothers who practice extended breastfeeding. These organizations include the International Childbirth Education Association and La Leche League International.
Diet during breastfeeding
Women who are breastfeeding need to be careful about what they eat and drink, since things can be passed to the baby through the breast milk. Just like during pregnancy, breastfeeding women should avoid fish that are high in mercury, and limit lower mercury fish intake. If a woman ingests alcohol, a small amount can be passed to the baby through breast milk. Alcohol-containing breastmilk has been shown to have a detrimental effect on motor development. Caffeine intake should be kept to no more than 300 milligrams (about one to three cups of regular coffee) per day for breastfeeding women, as excess caffeine in breastmilk can cause irritability and restlessness in infants. When consumed in normal, everyday amounts, caffeine is considered to be compatible with breastfeeding by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Nursing mothers concerned about the chemical bisphenol A, which has been shown to affect a childs health, should be aware that it can be passed to their baby though breast milk; they may want to limit their dietary intake of certain foods and adjust their shopping habits to avoid as much exposure as possible.
Healthy infant growth
The average breastfed baby doubles its birth weight in 5–6 months. By one year, a typical breastfed baby will weigh about 2½ times its birth weight. At one year, breastfed babies tend to be leaner than formula fed babies, which is healthier, especially in the long-run. A general guide to the growth of breastfed babies is the following:
- Weight gain of 4–7 ounces (112–200 grams) a week during the first month
- An average of 1–2 pounds (1/2 to 1 kilogram) per month for the first six months
- An average of one pound (1/2 kilogram) per month from six months to one year
- Babies usually grow in length by about an inch a month (2.5 cm) during the first six months, and around one-half inch a month from six months to one year.
Weaning is the process of introducing the infant to other food and reducing the supply of breast milk. The infant is fully weaned when it no longer receives any breast milk. Most mammals stop producing the enzyme lactase at the end of weaning, and become lactose intolerant. Figures vary, but worldwide, humans lose about 75 to 95 percent of birth lactase levels by early childhood, and there is a continuous decline in lactase during the course of a lifetime. However, the prevalence varies widely among ethnic backgrounds. Estimates range from 2 to 5 percent in persons from Northern Europe to nearly 100 percent in adult Asians and American Indians. Blacks and Ashkenazi Jews have prevalences of 60 to 80 percent, and Latinos have a prevalence of 50 to 80 percent.
In humans, the psychological factors involved in the weaning process are crucial for both mother and infant as issues of closeness and separation are very prominent during this stage.
In the past bromocriptine was in some countries frequently used to reduce the engorgement experienced by many women during weaning. This is now done only in exceptional cases as it causes frequent side effects, offers very little advantage over non-medical management and the possibility of serious side effects can not be ruled out. Other medications such as cabergoline, lisuride or birth control pills may occasionally be used as lactation suppressants.
Elizabeth Baldwin says in Extended Breastfeeding and the Law, "Because our culture tends to view the breast as sexual, it can be hard for people to realize that breastfeeding is the natural way to nurture children." In Western countries such as The United States of America, Canada, and Great Britain, extended breastfeeding is a taboo act. It is difficult to obtain accurate information and statistics about extended breastfeeding in these countries because of the mother's embarrassment. Mothers who nurse longer than the social norm sometimes hide their practices from all but very close family members and friends. This is called "closet nursing". In a study published by the Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 24% of American and Canadian mothers nursing past 6 months felt social hostility towards them. This number grew to 42% when mothers were nursing after 1 year of age. Also, 10% of mothers claimed embarrassment when more mobile, verbal toddlers made known in public the fact that they were nursed.
In the United States, breastfeeding beyond 1 year of age is considered extended breastfeeding, and in contrast to WHO recommendations, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated in 1997 that, "Breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child".
In the United States overall, according to a 2010 CDC "report card", 43% of babies are breastfed until 6 months and 22.4% are breastfed until 12 months, though breastfeeding rates varied among the states.
Breastfeeding rates in the U.S. at 6 months rose from 34.2% in 2000 to 43.5% in 2006 and the rates at 12 months rose from 15.7% in 2000 to 22.7% in 2006. The U.S. Healthy People 2010 goals were to have at least 60% of babies exclusively breastfed at 3 months and 25% of babies exclusively breastfed at 6 months so this goal has yet to be met.
In the United States a study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 75 percent of mothers began breastfeeding. However, by 6 months, the rate fell to 43% and was just 22% after a year. Breastfeeding rates vary across the country, from nearly 90 percent initiating breastfeeding in Utah to 52.5 percent in Mississippi. The health care law now requires large employers to provide breastfeeding mothers with breaks and a private space to feed their babies.
There have been several cases in the United States where children have been taken away from their mother's care because American courts or government agencies found the mother's extended breastfeeding to be inappropriate. In 1992, a New York State mother lost custody of her child for a year. She was still breastfeeding the child at age 3 and had reported experiences of sexual arousal while breastfeeding the child. The authorities took the child from the home in the fear that the mother might sexually abuse the child. Later, the social service agency that took over the case said that there was more to the case than could be released to the press due to confidentiality laws. In 2000, an Illinois child was removed from the mother's care after a judge ruled that the child might suffer emotional damage because of not being weaned. The child was later returned to the mother and the judge vacated the finding of neglect. A social service agency in Colorado removed a 5-year-old child from the mother because she was still breastfeeding, but the court ordered the child returned to its family immediately.
As of November 2012, the Ministry of Women and Child Development, with UNICEF as a technical partner, have kicked off a nationwide campaign to promote exclusive breastfeeding to infants up to the age of six months - one among a series of advisories it is issuing - as part of an awareness program targeted at eradicating malnutrition in the country. Indian actor Aamir Khan serves as the brand ambassador, and has acted in numerous televised public service announcements.
In the Philippines, the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Milk Code require that breastfeeding be encouraged for babies up to the age of 2 years old or beyond. Under the same code, it is prohibited to advertise infant formula or breastmilk substitutes intended for infants and young children 24 months old and below. In practice, however, a 2008 WHO survey found that on average, mothers in the Philippines breastfed their babies until 14 months of age, with breastfeeding extending up to 17 months on average in rural areas. Almost fifty-eight percent of mothers surveyed around the nation were still breastfeeding their babies when the babies were a year old, and 34.2% of mothers were still breastfeeding when their babies were 2 years old.
In 2012, it was reported that legislation had been introduced which would narrow down the application of the Milk Code (reducing the period recommending against artificial baby foods for babies from 0 to 36 months to 0 to six months only), would lift the restriction on donations of artificial milk products in emergency situations (encouraging mothers who suffer from disabilities to shift to milk substitutes instead of encouraging them to continue breastfeeding assisted by support persons), would change the legally mandated lactation break period for breastfeeding mothers from paid to unpaid status, and would remove the prohibition against milk companies giving away free samples of artificial milk products in the health care system.
Priscilla Colletto stated in Beyond Toddlerhood: The Breastfeeding Relationship Continues, "The adverse health effects of weaning a child before or during toddlerhood are well documented for Third World countries such as Guinea-Bissau, where children who were no longer breastfed at ages 12–35 months had a 3.5 times higher mortality rate than did their peers who continued to breastfeed." Dr. Laurence Grummer-Strawn, widely known in the breastfeeding research and advocacy communities, observed that breastfeeding is protective against diarrheal diseases and other infections and that breastfed children aged 12 to 36 months in Indonesia have much greater mid-arm circumference than children who have been weaned at an early age. He also noted that the incidence of malnourishment in breastfed Indonesian children is 3–5% less common than generally encountered in early-weened children. In one study, artificially fed infants had 2 to 3 times as many episodes of significant illnesses (defined as "otitis media, lower respiratory disease, significant vomiting or diarrhea, and any illness requiring hospital admission"). In traditional human societies, the lack of nutrients missing in breast milk such as iron, zinc, and vitamin b12 was supplemented through premastication and feeding of meat to the child.
In A Time to Wean, Katherine Dettwyler states that "Western, industrialized societies can compensate for some (but not all) of the immunological benefits of breastfeeding with antibiotics, vaccines and improved sanitation. But the physical, cognitive, and emotional needs of the young child persist." Many children who are breast-fed into their toddler years use the milk as a comforting, bonding moment with their mothers. In a 1974 survey of 152 mothers, 17% said that the security their toddlers obtained through extended breastfeeding helped them become more independent, 14% said that extended breastfeeding created a strong mother-child bond, and 14.6% said that extended breastfeeding strengthened their abilities as a mother. Four mothers said that they felt their child was too dependent and one mother considered her child a poor eater. Dr. Stein said "A mother in my practice who breastfed 2 children until 2 years of age explained that she would slow down and give her undivided attention to her child several times each day when breastfeeding. Her children knew that she always had time for those moments each day. This time was also important to the mother for relaxing and unwinding.... For many nursing toddlers, the breast comes to serve the same function as a favorite blanket or stuffed animal in providing comfort and a sense of security." One issue with extended breastfeeding is the ability of the mother and the child to separate. Some say that the desire for extended breastfeeding comes from the mother's inability to let go of "her baby". Baldwin refutes this statement, saying that the child is the one who chooses when they are weaned, as it is very difficult to force a child to breastfeed.
International board certified lactation consultants
International board certified lactation consultants (IBCLCs) are an excellent source of assistance for breastfeeding mothers. IBCLCs are health care professionals certified in lactation management. They work with mothers to solve breastfeeding problems and educate families and health care professionals about the benefits of breastfeeding. Research shows that rates of exclusive breastfeeding and of any breastfeeding are higher among women who have had babies in hospitals with IBCLCs on staff.
Physiological constraints to breastfeeding
While breastfeeding is a natural human activity, difficulties and complications are not uncommon. Putting the baby to the breast as soon as possible after the birth helps to avoid many problems, including mastitis. The AAP breastfeeding policy says: "Delay weighing, measuring, bathing, needle-sticks, and eye prophylaxis until after the first feeding is completed." Many breastfeeding difficulties can be resolved with proper hospital procedures, properly trained midwives, doctors and hospital staff, and lactation consultants. There are some situations in which breastfeeding may be harmful to the infant, including infection with HIV and acute poisoning by environmental contaminants such as lead. The Institute of Medicine has reported that breast surgery, including breast implants or breast reduction surgery, reduces the chances that a woman will have sufficient milk to breast feed. Research shows that women whose pregnancies are unintended are less likely to breast feed their babies.
Barriers to breastfeeding
The majority of mothers intend to breastfeed when their baby is born. There are many things that happen that disrupt or intervene in this plan. Here are just a few of the barriers that women face when attempting to breastfeed.
- Birth procedures – routine separation of the baby from the mother, delayed breastfeeding initiation, vigorous routine suctioning, medications and mode of delivery all interfere with breastfeeding. A "substantial" number of hospital and facilities implemented procedures and policies that were not evidenced based and that were known to interfere with lactation.
- Nursery policies – additional separation, rooming in policies, routine bottles and pacifiers can also prevent the baby from learning to latch and establishing a supply. About a quarter of all breastfeeding infants receive formula supplementation in the first two days of life.
- Knowledge and social support
- Personal – breastfeeding is the biologic norm but in absence of watching others nurse their babies (i.e., a behavioral history of breastfeeding), it is a lost behavior. Classes, books and personal counseling (professional or lay) can be beneficial. Some women do not want to breastfeed because they fear that breastfeeding will negatively impact the look of their breasts, although medical evidence attributes "drooping" or "sagging" of the breasts to pregnancy, aging, and smoking habits. Jae Ireland reports “the idea that breastfeeding causes saggier, smaller breasts is a myth, as proven by a 2008 study published in the Aesthetic Surgery Journal. The study found that while breastfeeding had no effect on a woman's breasts, other factors did contribute to sagginess, such as a mother's advanced age, her number of pregnancies and whether or not she smoked. All three factors can result in altered breasts, but breastfeeding was not identified as a marker for a change in overall breast appearance.”
- Partner – Partners also lack basic breastfeeding knowledge and are typically unsure of their role in breastfeeding.
- Practitioner – Physicians and nurses have surprisingly little training in lactation and lactation support. One of the main action items in The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding is to help educate practitioners about breastfeeding and breastfeeding issues. Research has reported women look to primary care providers for breastfeeding information and support but it is a need that often goes unmet.
- Workforce – Returning to work is the most common cited reason for discontinuing breastfeeding. Maternity leave in the US varies widely despite the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which provides most working mothers up to 12 weeks. Many mothers are forced to take unpaid time off from their job and the majority do not use FMLA for the full twelve weeks. Fathers are also allowed to use FMLA for the birth or adoption of the child. Maternity leave varies widely by state. Save the Children recently examined maternity leave laws, the right to nursing breaks at work, and several other indicators to create a ranking of 36 industrialized countries measuring which ones have the most – and the least – supportive policies for women who want to breastfeed. Norway topped the scorecard and the United States came in last.
- Poor latch - Pain caused from mis-positioning the baby on the breast or a tongue-tie in the infant can cause great pain in the mother and therefore discourage her from breastfeeding. These problems are generally easy to correct (by re-positioning or clipping the tongue-tie).
Researchers have found several social factors that correlate with differences in initiation, frequency, and duration of breastfeeding practices of mothers. Race, ethnic differences and socioeconomic status and other factors have been shown to affect a mother's choice whether or not to breastfeed, and how long she breastfeeds her child. A recent study found that on average women that breastfed their infants had higher levels of education, were older, and were more likely to be white. The reasons for the persistently lower rates of breastfeeding among African American women are not well understood, but employment may play a role. African American women tend to return to work earlier after childbirth than white women, and they are more likely to work in environments that do not support breastfeeding. Although research has shown that returning to work is associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding, a supportive work environment may make a difference in whether mothers are able to continue breastfeeding.
Deborah L. Dee's research found that women and children who qualify for WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children were among those who were least likely to initiate breastfeeding. Income level can also contribute to women discontinuing breastfeeding early. More highly educated women are more likely to have access to information regarding difficulties with breastfeeding, allowing them to continue breastfeeding through difficulty rather than weaning early. Women in higher status jobs are more likely to have access to a lactation room and suffer less social stigma from having to breastfeed or express breastmilk at work. In addition, women who are unable to take an extended leave from work following the birth of their child are less likely to continue breastfeeding when they return to work. Low income women are more likely to have unintended pregnancies, and women whose pregnancies are unintended are less likely to breast feed their babies.
Breastfeeding in public
Breastfeeding in public is forbidden in some jurisdictions, not addressed by law in others, and a granted legal right in public and the workplace in yet others. Where it is a legal right, some mothers may nevertheless be reluctant to breastfeed, and some people may object to the practice.
There have been incidents of owners of premises, or people present, objecting to or forbidding breastfeeding. In some cases the mothers have left; in others, where a law guaranteeing the right to breastfeed has been broken, there has been legal action. Sometimes a company has apologised after the fact.
In 2006, the editors of US Babytalk magazine received many complaints from readers after the cover of the August issue depicted a baby nursing at a bare breast. Even though the model's nipple was not shown, readers—many of them mothers—wrote that the image was "gross". In a follow-up poll, one-quarter of 4,000 readers who responded thought the cover was negative. Babytalk editor Susan Kane commented, "There's a huge puritanical streak in Americans." In a 2004 survey conducted by the American Dietetic Association, 43% of the 3,719 respondents believed women ought to have the right to breast-feed in public.
Negative perception of breastfeeding in social settings has led some women to feel discomfort when breastfeeding in public. Even though many women are educated about the health benefits of breastfeeding, less than 25% choose to breastfeed their children. Western society tends to think of breasts in sexual terms instead of for their main biological purpose, to bring nourishment to infants. The sexualized image of breasts has led many to have an adverse reaction to breastfeeding because people do not like to associate feeding an infant with sexual pleasure. The consequences of Western culture’s sexualization of breasts has led women feeling embarrassed to breast feed in public, and instead, in private settings. Limitations on places in which women can breastfeed, as well as negative cultural connotations with breastfeeding may play a role in the amount of time a woman will breastfeed. The end result is often that the woman may give up breastfeeding and switch to a bottle.
Maternal guilt and shame
Research has shown that maternal guilt and shame is often associated with how a mother feeds their infant. This guilt and shame is a result of the inability to achieve the idealized notion of what it means to be a good mother. Mothers of both bottle and breast fed babies often feel shame and/or guilt for different reasons. Mothers who bottle feed their infants may feel that they are failures at breastfeeding. On the other hand, mothers who breastfeed may feel exposed when breastfeeding in public places because of sexual connotations associated with breasts. They may also fear ridicule from emotional responses to an exposed breast. Some may see breastfeeding as, “indecent, disgusting, animalistic, sexual, and even possibly a perverse act.” In response to scrutiny concerning public breastfeeding, advocates use nurse-ins to show others that there should be no shame in breastfeeding in public. However some advocates don’t fight the shame a woman can feel when she cannot breastfeed and must bottle-feed her baby. Shame should not be used as a tool to advocate breastfeeding, rather women should be able to individually define what a good mother is. Rather than focusing on the choice a woman has made on whether or not to breastfeed, it is suggested that there be a redirection with the emphasis of providing women with education on the benefits of breastfeeding as well as problem solving skills for women who may find it difficult.
Mobility to breast milk
The cultural context of Western society, does not always seem to advocate for breastfeeding in public. According to one study published in the Journal of American Dietetic Association, over half of the people who voted believed that women should not be allowed to breastfeed in public. This study confirms previous studies that indicate that Americans do not want to see breasts in public places. Thus the stigma associated with breastfeeding in public can guide parents to seek an alternative to breastfeeding, even though it may not be as healthy for the child. There used to be only two options for feeding infants: breastfeeding or formula. With the introduction of formula as a scientifically proven way of nourishing infants, many people chose to feed their child formula over breast milk. Formula was popular for the convenience it offered by opening care opportunities to others. When examining the invention of formula from a bio cultural perspective, one might also see the invention of formula as a way in which western culture adapted to negative cultural perceptions of breastfeeding in public. In response to negativism against breastfeeding, the La Leche League began a breastfeeding advocacy movement that aimed to educate the public about the short and long term benefits of breastfeeding for both mother and child. With the introduction of the breast pump came a “third option,” that offered the benefits of mobility associated with formula feeding and the health benefits of breastfeeding. This allowed care relationships to extend across further distances without compromising the health benefits of breast milk.
Role of marketing
Controversy has arisen over the marketing of breast milk vs. formula; particularly how it affects the education of mothers in third world countries and their comprehension (or lack thereof) of the health benefits of breastfeeding. The most famous example, the Nestlé boycott, arose in the 1970s and continues to be supported by high-profile stars and international groups to this day.
In 1981, the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted Resolution WHA34.22 which includes the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. Subsequently, the Innocenti Declaration was made by WHO and UNICEF policy-makers in August 1990 to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding.
The central concern about breastfeeding with HIV is whether or not it places the child at risk of becoming infected. Varying factors, such as the viral load in the mother’s milk, contribute to the difficulty in creating breastfeeding recommendations for HIV-positive mothers. It is also possible for the infant to be infected with HIV throughout the duration of the pregnancy or during the birthing process (intrapartum). Breastfeeding with HIV guidelines established by the WHO suggest that HIV-infected mothers (particularly those in resource-poor countries) practice exclusive breastfeeding only, rather than mixed breastfeeding practices that involve other dietary supplements or fluids. Many studies have revealed the high benefit of exclusive breastfeeding to both mother and child, documenting that exclusive breastfeeding for a period of 6 months significantly reduces transmission, provides the infant with a greater chance of survival in the first year of life, and helps the mother to recover from the negative health effects of birth much more quickly. However, a recent study conducted by researchers from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine suggests that women infected with HIV can, in fact, breastfeed without transmitting the virus to their children, because components in breast milk are understood as able to kill the virus. High levels of certain polyunsaturated fatty acids in breast milk (including eicosadienoic, arachidonic and gamma-linolenic acids) are associated with a reduced risk of child infection when nursed by HIV-positive mothers. Arachidonic acid and gamma-linolenic acid may also reduce viral shedding of HIV in breast milk. Despite these positive indicators, other studies have determined that bottle-fed babies of HIV-infected mothers approximately has a 19 percent chance of becoming infected, in comparison to breastfed babies who had an approximate 49 percent chance of infection. Such a variance in findings makes it difficult to institute a proper set of guidelines for HIV-infected women in third-world or developing countries, where alternative forms of feeding are not always acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable, and safe (AFASS). Thus after much research, the benefits and/or consequences of breastfeeding with HIV are still currently under debate.
Challenges to PMTCT policy
The practice of breastfeeding for HIV positive mothers is a highly contested and controversial global public health concern. Programs for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and other international guidelines offer preventative interventions to address mother to child transmission(MTCT) of HIV in Third World countries. PMTCT programs provide HIV-positive women with recommendations and services including antiretroviral therapy (ART), modifications in infant feeding practices (i.e., exclusive breastfeeding or exclusive replacement feeding), and counseling.
Although prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programs have been implemented across different regions, their success in resource-constrained settings is still widely debated upon. In 2008, the majority of sub-Saharan Africa as a whole had an estimate of 430,000 HIV infections among children under the age of 15. HIV-positive women’s lack of participation and adherence to PMTCT services and infant feeding guidelines has made the success of these policies difficult, despite the knowledge and technology that has been dedicated to them. Many women fear knowing their HIV status. Generally speaking, HIV-positive mothers lack support, especially from males, thus resulting in their stigmatization and exclusion by members of the community. It is because of this that most women end up losing contact with development programs, which end soon after the mother delivers. The discontinuation of these programs makes a knowledge and understanding of different feeding options difficult for these mothers, because these programs are not there to present them with the necessary information.
Cross-Cultural Experiences of Breastfeeding with HIV
Access to available resources for the prevention of MTCT of HIV varies across different cultural regions. “MTCT of HIV has been virtually eliminated in well-resourced settings such as the United States and Europe”. Available medical and therapeutic resources in developed countries can include drugs for HIV-positive mothers during pregnancy and labour, cesarean delivery to reduce the infant’s exposure to infection; and modifications in infant feeding practices. In third world settings, medical resources and technology can be very hard to find and can serve as a financial burden to HIV-positive mothers. HIV-infected mothers refer to counselors for expert knowledge and recommendations on infant feeding and health. Treatment amenities in resource-constrained settings are also available to HIV-positive mothers in the form of antiretroviral therapy (ART) which is one resource that has contributed to the elimination of MTCT of HIV in first world countries. In order to have access to resources, HIV-positive mothers must be able maintain follow up appointments regularly, however, this is problematic in resource-limited settings due to weak infrastructure in health care systems in countries such as India, Tanzania and Nigeria. This can also serve as a dilemma for HIV-positive mothers because although limited resources are available to them, financial constraint can prevent women from accessing available treatments. This can influence HIV-positive mother’s decision to rely solely on breastfeeding as a primary feeding option due to financial instability.
Anthropological research demonstrates that in contexts where breastfeeding is essential to infant survival, such as in resource poor settings, PMTCT infant feeding guidelines challenge notions of motherhood and women’s decision making power over infant care, and colour HIV positive mothers’ infant feeding experiences. In eastern Africa, infant mortality is high and breastfeeding is vital for infant survival. Here, motherhood is defined as the responsibility for ensuring the child’s proper growth and health. Breastfeeding is also seen as a cultural practice that helps create a social bond between mother and child. However, there is a disjuncture between PMTCT policy’s infant feeding guideline and what is considered to be good mothering behaviour. The PMTCT policy promotes replacement feeding because it is believed to prevent the risk of transmission of HIV. However, adhering to such guidelines are difficult for mothers in resource-limited settings who believe that not breastfeeding one’s child would be harmful to their health and survival, as well as threaten the “development of close bodily and emotional bonds between mother and child”. As such, not breastfeeding, for HIV-positive women, is perceived as failing to be a good mother. Thus, PMTCT programs impact HIV-positive women’s agency and decision-making in infant care, as well as challenge their cultural conceptions of good motherhood.
World Health Organization breastfeeding guideline for HIV-infected mothers
In an effort to further refine the United Nations guideline for optimal infant feeding options for HIV-infected mothers, the World Health Organization (WHO) held a three-day convention in Geneva in 2006 to review new evidence that had been established since they last established a guideline in 2000. Participants included UN agencies, representative from nongovernmental organizations, researchers, infant feeding experts, and WHO headquarters departments. The convention concluded with the following recommendations: If replacement feeding is acceptable, feasible, affordable and safe, HIV-infected mothers are recommended to use replacement feeding. Otherwise, exclusive breastfeeding is recommended. At six months, if replacement feeding is still not available, HIV-infected mothers are encouraged to slowly introduce food while continuing breastfeeding. Those with HIV-infected infants are recommended to continue breastfeeding even after 6 months.
In a 2010 update the WHO stated that significant programmatic experience and research evidence regarding HIV and infant feeding had accumulated since WHO's recommendations on infant feeding in the context of HIV were last revised in 2006. In particular, evidence has been reported that antiretroviral (ARV) interventions to either the HIV-infected mother or HIV-exposed infant can significantly reduce the risk of postnatal transmission of HIV through breastfeeding. This evidence has major implications for how women living with HIV might feed their infants, and how health workers should counsel these mothers. Together, breastfeeding and ARV intervention have the potential to significantly improve infants' chances of surviving while remaining HIV uninfected.
While the 2010 recommendations are generally consistent with the previous guidance, they recognize the important impact of ARVs during the breastfeeding period, and recommend that national authorities in each country decide which infant feeding practice, i.e. breastfeeding with an ARV intervention to reduce transmission or avoidance of all breastfeeding, should be promoted and supported by their Maternal and Child Health services. This differs from the previous recommendations in which health workers were expected to individually counsel all HIV-infected mothers about the various infant feeding options, and it was then for mothers to decide between them.
Where national authorities promote breastfeeding and ARVs, mothers known to be HIV-infected are now recommended to breastfeed their infants until at least 12 months of age. The recommendation that replacement feeding should not be used unless it is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe remains.
Taking medication while breastfeeding
In a review article published in the journal Pediatrics, data from 2001 to 2012 were analyzed to discern any safety issue for mothers taking prescription drugs while breastfeeding. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises that mothers can take most prescription drugs but should avoid certain painkillers, psychiatric drugs and herbal supplements. The health benefits of mother taking drugs and breastfeeding should be weighed against the risk of drug exposure to the infant. The report recommends consulting the NIH database 'LactMed' on the most up-to-date information on drugs and breastfeeding.
- "Nutrition in the First 1,000 Days: State of the World’s Mothers, 2012". Retrieved October 26, 2013.
- Kramer MS, Kakuma R (2002). "Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding". In Kramer, Michael S. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1): CD003517. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003517. PMID 11869667.
- Baker R (2003). "Human milk substitutes. An American perspective". Minerva Pediatr 55 (3): 195–207. PMID 12900706.
- Agostoni C, Haschke F (June 2003). "Infant formulas. Recent developments and new issues". Minerva Pediatr. 55 (3): 181–94. PMID 12900705.
- Awatef M, Olfa G, Imed H, Kacem M, Imen C, Rim C, Mohamed B, Slim BA (March 2010). "Breastfeeding reduces breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Tunisia". Cancer Causes Control 21 (3): 393–7. doi:10.1007/s10552-009-9471-3. PMID 19921444.
- "Breastfeeding FAQs". Retrieved October 26, 2013.
- Samour, P. Q., & King, K. (Eds.). (2012). Pediatric Nutrition (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Jones & Baretless Learning.
- Cornall, D (June 2011). "A review of the breastfeeding literature relevant to osteopathic practice". International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 14 (2): 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2010.12.003.
- Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
- Riordan J, Countryman BA (1980). "Basics of breastfeeding. Part I: Infant feeding patterns past and present". JOGN Nurs 9 (4): 207–10. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1980.tb02778.x. PMID 7001126.
- Picciano MF (February 2001). "Nutrient composition of human milk". Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 48 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70285-6. PMID 11236733.
- Riordan JM (June 1997). "The cost of not breastfeeding: a commentary". J Hum Lact 13 (2): 93–7. doi:10.1177/089033449701300202. PMID 9233193.
- Bartick M, Reinhold A (May 2010). "The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis". Pediatrics 125 (5): e1048–56. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1616. PMID 20368314. "If 90% of US families could comply with medical recommendations to breastfeed exclusively for 6 months, the United States would save $13 billion per year and prevent an excess 911 deaths"
- Falco M (2010-04-05). "Study: lack of breastfeeding costs lives, billions of dollars". CNN.
- Oddy WH, Kendall GE, Li J, Jacoby P, Robinson M, de Klerk NH, Silburn SR, Zubrick SR, Landau LI, Stanley FJ (April 2010). "The long-term effects of breastfeeding on child and adolescent mental health: a pregnancy cohort study followed for 14 years". J. Pediatr. 156 (4): 568–74. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.020. PMID 20004910.
- Horton S, Sanghvi T, Phillips M, Fiedler J, Perez-Escamilla R, Lutter C, Rivera A, Segall-Correa AM (June 1996). "Breastfeeding promotion and priority setting in health". Health Policy Plan 11 (2): 156–68. doi:10.1093/heapol/11.2.156. PMID 10158457.
- Nathoo, Tasnim; Ostry, Aleck (2009). The One Best Way?: Breastfeeding History, Politics, and Policy in Canada. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press. ISBN 978-1-55458-171-9.[page needed]
- World Health Organization. (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization and UNICEF. ISBN 92-4-156221-8. Retrieved 2009-09-20.
- "Why breastfeed? | National Health Service".
- Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, et al. (February 2005). "Breastfeeding and the use of human milk". Pediatrics 115 (2): 496–506. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491. PMID 15687461.
- Breastfeeding: Promotion | DNPAO | CDC
- Mohrbacher, Nancy; Stock, Julie (2003). The Breastfeeding Answer Book (3rd ed. (revised) ed.). La Leche League International. ISBN 0-912500-92-1.
- Sobrinho LG (2003). "Prolactin, psychological stress and environment in humans: adaptation and maladaptation". Pituitary 6 (1): 35–39. doi:10.1023/A:1026229810876. PMID 14674722.
- Bose CL, D'Ercole AJ, Lester AG, Hunter RS, Barrett JR (1981). "Relactation by mothers of sick and premature infants". Pediatrics 67 (4): 565–569. PMID 6789296.
- "Mothers and Children Benefit from Breastfeeding". Womenshealth.gov. 27 February 2009. Archived from the original on 16 Mar 2009.
- Colen, Cynthia G., and Ramey, David M. “Is breast truly best? Estimating the effects of breastfeeding on long-term child health and wellbeing in the United States using sibling comparisons.” Social Science and Medicine. 109. (2014): 55-65. Print.
- Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA (August 1993). "Maternal weight-loss patterns during prolonged lactation". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 58 (2): 162–6. PMID 8338042.
- Fisher D (November 2006). "Social drugs and breastfeeding". Queensland, Australia: Health e-Learning.
- Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J (April 2007). "Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries". Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) (153): 1–186. ISBN 978-1-58763-242-6. PMID 17764214.
- Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victora CG (2007). Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-159523-0. Retrieved 2010-04-05.
- Lucas A, Cole TJ (1990). "Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis". Lancet 336 (8730): 1519–23. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)93304-8. PMID 1979363.
- Hanson LA, Söderström T (1981). "Human milk: Defense against infection". Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 61: 147–59. PMID 6798576.
- Van de Perre P (July 2003). "Transfer of antibody via mother's milk". Vaccine 21 (24): 3374–6. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00336-0. PMID 12850343.
- Jackson KM, Nazar AM (April 2006). "Breastfeeding, the immune response, and long-term health". J Am Osteopath Assoc 106 (4): 203–7. PMID 16627775.
- Vukavic T (1983). "Intestinal absorption of IgA in the newborn". Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2 (2): 248–251. doi:10.1097/00005176-198305000-00006. PMID 6875749.
- Weaver LT Wadd N, Taylor CE, Greenwell J, Toms GL (1991). "The ontogeny of serum IgA in the newborn". Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2 (2): 72. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3038.1991.tb00185.x.
- Kunz C, Rodriguez-Palmero M, Koletzko B, Jensen R (June 1999). "Nutritional and biochemical properties of human milk, Part I: General aspects, proteins, and carbohydrates". Clin Perinatol 26 (2): 307–33. PMID 10394490.
- Rodriguez-Palmero M, Koletzko B, Kunz C, Jensen R (June 1999). "Nutritional and biochemical properties of human milk: II. Lipids, micronutrients, and bioactive factors". Clin Perinatol 26 (2): 335–59. PMID 10394491.
- Owen MJ, Baldwin CD, Swank PR, Pannu AK, Johnson DL, Howie VM (November 1993). "Relation of infant feeding practices, cigarette smoke exposure, and group child care to the onset and duration of otitis media with effusion in the first two years of life". J. Pediatr. 123 (5): 702–11. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80843-1. PMID 8229477.
- Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA (May 1995). "Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants". J. Pediatr. 126 (5 Pt 1): 696–702. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70395-0. PMID 7751991.
- Blaymore Bier JA, Oliver T, Ferguson A, Vohr BR (2002). "Human milk reduces outpatient upper respiratory symptoms in premature infants during their first year of life". J Perinatol 22 (5): 354–9. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7210742. PMID 12082468.
- Mårild S, Hansson S, Jodal U, Odén A, Svedberg K (February 2004). "Protective effect of breastfeeding against urinary tract infection". Acta Paediatr. 93 (2): 164–8. doi:10.1080/08035250310007402. PMID 15046267.
- Winslow, Ron (26 August 2013). "Many Drugs Found Safe for Breast-Feeding Mothers". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
- Sachs HC (2013). "The Transfer of Drugs and Therapeutics Into Human Breast Milk: An Update on Selected Topics". Pediatrics (The American Academy of Pediatrics) 132 (3): e796–e809. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1985. PMID 23979084.
- Horne RS, Parslow PM, Ferens D, Watts AM, Adamson TM (2004). "Comparison of evoked arousability in breast and formula fed infants". Arch. Dis. Child. 89 (1): 22–5. PMC 1755888. PMID 14709496.
- Vennemann MM, Bajanowski T, Brinkmann B, Jorch G, Yücesan K, Sauerland C, Mitchell EA (March 2009). "Does breastfeeding reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome?". Pediatrics 123 (3): e406–10. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2145. PMID 19254976.
- Perez-Bravo F, Carrasco E, Gutierrez-Lopez MD, Martinez MT, Lopez G, de los Rios MG (February 1996). "Genetic predisposition and environmental factors leading to the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Chilean children". J. Mol. Med. 74 (2): 105–9. doi:10.1007/BF00196786. PMID 8820406.
- Owen CG, Martin RM, Whincup PH, Smith GD, Cook DG (November 2006). "Does breastfeeding influence risk of type 2 diabetes in later life? A quantitative analysis of published evidence". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84 (5): 1043–54. PMID 17093156.
- Mayer-Davis EJ, Dabelea D, Lamichhane AP, D'Agostino RB, Liese AD, Thomas J, McKeown RE, Hamman RF (March 2008). "Breast-feeding and type 2 diabetes in the youth of three ethnic groups: the SEARCh for diabetes in youth case-control study". Diabetes Care 31 (3): 470–5. doi:10.2337/dc07-1321. PMID 18071004.
- Bier JA, Oliver T, Ferguson AE, Vohr BR (November 2002). "Human milk improves cognitive and motor development of premature infants during infancy". J Hum Lact 18 (4): 361–7. doi:10.1177/089033402237909. PMID 12449052.
- Armstrong J, Reilly JJ (2002). "Breastfeeding and lowering the risk of childhood obesity". Lancet 359 (9322): 2003–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08837-2. PMID 12076560.
- Arenz S, Rückerl R, Koletzko B, von Kries R (2004). "Breast-feeding and childhood obesity--a systematic review". Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 28 (10): 1247–56. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802758. PMID 15314625.
- Li R, Fein SB, Grummer-Strawn LM (June 2010). "Do infants fed from bottles lack self-regulation of milk intake compared with directly breastfed infants?". Pediatrics 125 (6): e1386–93. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2549. PMID 20457676.
- "Most Popular E-mail Newsletter". USA Today. 2011-02-06.
- Greer FR, Sicherer SH, Burks AW (January 2008). "Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: the role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas". Pediatrics 121 (1): 183–91. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3022. PMID 18166574.
- Oddy WH, Holt PG, Sly PD, Read AW, Landau LI, Stanley FJ, Kendall GE, Burton PR (September 1999). "Association between breast feeding and asthma in 6 year old children: findings of a prospective birth cohort study". BMJ 319 (7213): 815–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7213.815. PMC 314207. PMID 10496824.
- Pratt HF (April 1984). "Breastfeeding and eczema". Early Hum. Dev. 9 (3): 283–90. doi:10.1016/0378-3782(84)90039-2. PMID 6734490.
- Kramer MS, Matush L, Vanilovich I, Platt R, Bogdanovich N, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shishko G, Mazer B (2007). "Effect of prolonged and exclusive breast feeding on risk of allergy and asthma: cluster randomised trial". BMJ 335 (7624): 815. doi:10.1136/bmj.39304.464016.AE. PMC 2034727. PMID 17855282.
- Mead MN (2008). "Contaminants in human milk: weighing the risks against the benefits of breastfeeding". Environ Health Perspect 116 (10): A426–34. doi:10.1289/ehp.116-a426. PMC 2569122. PMID 18941560.
- Akobeng AK, Ramanan AV, Buchan I, Heller RF (2006). "Effect of breast feeding on risk of coeliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies". Arch. Dis. Child. 91 (1): 39–43. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.082016. PMC 2083075. PMID 16287899.
- Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Sprague BL, Hampton JM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Newcomb PA (May 2008). "Effects of birth order and maternal age on breast cancer risk: modification by whether women had been breast-fed". Epidemiology 19 (3): 417–23. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816a1cff. PMC 2782562. PMID 18379425.
- Williams MJ, Williams SM, Poulton R (February 2006). "Breast feeding is related to C reactive protein concentration in adult women". J Epidemiol Community Health 60 (2): 146–8. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.039222. PMC 2566145. PMID 16415265.
- Leeson CP, Kattenhorn M, Deanfield JE, Lucas A (March 2001). "Duration of breast feeding and arterial distensibility in early adult life: population based study". BMJ 322 (7287): 643–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7287.643. PMC 26543. PMID 11250848.
- Montgomery SM, Ehlin A, Sacker A (December 2006). "Breast feeding and resilience against psychosocial stress". Arch. Dis. Child. 91 (12): 990–4. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.096826. PMC 2082977. PMID 16887859. Lay summary – ScienceDaily (August 3, 2006).
- Breastfeeding & the Oral Cavity
- Der G, Batty GD, Deary IJ (2006). "Effect of breast feeding on intelligence in children: prospective study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis". BMJ 333 (7575): 945. doi:10.1136/bmj.38978.699583.55. PMC 1633819. PMID 17020911.
- Evenhouse E, Reilly S (2005). "Improved estimates of the benefits of breastfeeding using sibling comparisons to reduce selection bias". Health Serv Res 40 (6 Pt 1): 1781–802. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00453.x. PMC 1361236. PMID 16336548.
- Kramer MS, Aboud F, Mironova E, Vanilovich I, Platt RW, Matush L, Igumnov S, Fombonne E, Bogdanovich N, Ducruet T, Collet JP, Chalmers B, Hodnett E, Davidovsky S, Skugarevsky O, Trofimovich O, Kozlova L, Shapiro S (2008). "Breastfeeding and child cognitive development: new evidence from a large randomized trial". Arch Gen Psychiatry 65 (5): 578–84. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.578. PMID 18458209.
- Taylor, Justin Q. (10 June 2013). "The First 1,000 Days Define the Rest of Our Lives: New Infant Nutrition Research". Public Health Report. Retrieved 19 June 2013.
- Deoni SC, Dean DC, Piryatinsky I, O'Muircheartaigh J, Waskiewicz N, Lehman K, Han M, Dirks H (May 2013). "Breastfeeding and early white matter development: A cross-sectional study". Neuroimage 82C: 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.090. PMC 3777218. PMID 23721722.
- Caspi A, Williams B, Kim-Cohen J, Craig IW, Milne BJ, Poulton R, Schalkwyk LC, Taylor A, Werts H, Moffitt TE (2007). "Moderation of breastfeeding effects on the IQ by genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (47): 18860–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704292104. PMC 2141867. PMID 17984066.
- Paddock C (6 November 2007). "IQ boost from breastfeeding linked to common gene". Medical News Today. Retrieved 20 September 2009.
- Steer CD, Davey Smith G, Emmett PM, Hibbeln JR, Golding J (2010). "FADS2 polymorphisms modify the effect of breastfeeding on child IQ". In Penha-Goncalves, Carlos. PLoS ONE 5 (7): e11570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011570. PMC 2903485. PMID 20644632.
- Martin NW, Benyamin B, Hansell NK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG, Wright MJ, Bates TC (January 2011). "Cognitive function in adolescence: testing for interactions between breast-feeding and FADS2 polymorphisms". J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 50 (1): 55–62.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.010. PMID 21156270.
- Feldman S (July–August 2000). "Nursing Through Pregnancy". New Beginnings (La Leche League International) 17 (4): 116–118, 145. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
- WHO "strategic directions for improving the health and development of children and adolescents", WHO/FCH/CAH/02.21, Geneva: Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, World Health Organization.
- The Baby Friendly Initiative | Resources | Skin-to-skin contact
- Pisacane A, Continisio GI, Aldinucci M, D'Amora S, Continisio P (October 2005). "A controlled trial of the father's role in breastfeeding promotion". Pediatrics 116 (4): e494–8. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0479. PMID 16199676.
- van Willigen J (2002). Applied anthropology: an introduction. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. ISBN 0-89789-833-8.[page needed]
- Stuart-Macadam P, Dettwyler K (1995). Breastfeeding: biocultural perspectives. Aldine de Gruyter. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-202-01192-9.
- Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Lim I, Selamat N, Ratnam SS (1994). "Influence of breastfeeding and nipple stimulation on postpartum uterine activity". Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101 (9): 804–5. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11950.x. PMID 7947531.
- Zuckerbrot, Tanya (2012-08-03). "Benefits of breastfeeding". http://www.foxnews.com. Retrieved Sep 27, 2012.
- "Can Breastfeeding Help You Lose Weight". Health News. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
- Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA (1993). "Maternal weight-loss patterns during prolonged lactation". Am J Clin Nutr 58 (2): 162–6. PMID 8338042.
- Lovelady CA, Garner KE, Moreno KL, Williams JP (2000). "The effect of weight loss in overweight, lactating women on the growth of their infants". N Engl J Med 342 (7): 449–53. doi:10.1056/NEJM200002173420701. PMID 10675424.
- Villamor E, Cnattingius S (2006). "Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study". Lancet 368 (9542): 1164–1170. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7. PMID 17011943.
- Cedergren M (2006). "Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome in Sweden". Int J Gynaecol Obstet 93 (3): 269–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.002. PMID 16626716.
- Polley BA, Wing RR, Sims CJ (2002). "Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women". Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26 (11): 1494–502. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802130. PMID 12439652.
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD et al. (2007). "Births: final data for 2005". National Vital Statistics Reports 56: 1–104.
- Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines, Food and Nutrition Board, and Board on Children, Youth and Families. Weight gain during pregnancy: Reexamining the guidelines. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. http://www.nap.edu. Accessed 30 November 2011.
- Kac G, Benício MH, Velásquez-Meléndez G, Valente JG, Struchiner CJ (March 2004). "Breastfeeding and postpartum weight retention in a cohort of Brazilian women". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79 (3): 487–93. PMID 14985226.
- Brewer MM, Bates MR, Vannoy LP (1989). "Postpartum changes in maternal weight and body fat depots in lactating vs nonlactating women". Am J Clin Nutr 49 (2): 259–265. PMID 2916446.
- Sadurskis A, Kabir N, Wager J, Forsum E (1988). "Energy metabolism, body composition, and milk production in healthy Swedish women during lactation". Am J Clin Nutr 48 (1): 44–49. PMID 3389329.
- Sohlström A, Forsum E (1995). "Changes in adipose tissue volume and distribution during reproduction in Swedish women as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61 (2): 287–95. PMID 7840065.
- Kramer FM, Stunkard AJ, Marshall KA, McKinney S, Liebschutz J (1993). "Breast-feeding reduces maternal lower-body fat". J Am Diet Assoc 93 (4): 429–433. doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92289-A. PMID 8454811.
- Stuebe A, Gillman M, Kleinman K, Rifas-Shiman S, Rich-Edwards J (2007). "Duration of lactation and maternal metabolism at 3 years postpartum". Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 (6): S128. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.450.
- Hilson JA, Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL (2006). "Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with earlier termination of breast-feeding among white women". J Nutr. 136 (1): 140–146. PMID 16365073.
- Janney CA, Zhang D, Sowers M (1997). "Lactation and weight retention". Am J Clin Nutr 66 (5): 1116–24. PMID 9356528.
- Price C; Robinson S (2004). Birth: Conceiving, Nurturing and Giving Birth to Your Baby. McMillan. p. 489. ISBN 1-4050-3612-5.
- Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB (1995). "Prolonged lactation and endometrial cancer. WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives". Int J Epidemiol 24 (3): 499–503. doi:10.1093/ije/24.3.499. PMID 7672888.
- Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A (2000). "Breast feeding practices in relation to endometrial cancer risk, USA". Cancer Causes Control 11 (7): 663–7. doi:10.1023/A:1008978624266. PMID 10977111.
- Stuebe AM, Michels KB, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rexrode K, Rich-Edwards JW (2009). "Duration of lactation and incidence of myocardial infarction in middle to late adulthood". Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 (2): 138.e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.001. PMC 2684022. PMID 19110223.
- Melton LJ, Bryant SC, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Malkasian GD, Judd HL, Riggs BL (March 1993). "Influence of breastfeeding and other reproductive factors on bone mass later in life". Osteoporosis International (London: Springer) 3 (2): 76–83. doi:10.1007/BF01623377. PMID 8453194.
- Rayburn W, Piehl E, Lewis E, Schork A, Sereika S, Zabrensky K (1985). "Changes in insulin therapy during pregnancy". Am J Perinatol 2 (4): 271–5. doi:10.1055/s-2007-999968. PMID 3902039.
- Ram KT, Bobby P, Hailpern SM, Lo JC, Schocken M, Skurnick J, Santoro N (2008). "Duration of lactation is associated with lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in midlife—SWAN, the study of women's health across the nation". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198 (3): 268.2e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.044. PMC 2395466. PMID 18191796.
- Gunderson EP, Jacobs DR, Chiang V, Lewis CE, Feng J, Quesenberry CP, Sidney S (2009). "Duration of Lactation and Incidence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Women of Reproductive Age According to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Status: A 20-Year Prospective Study in CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults)". Diabetes 59 (2): 495–504. doi:10.2337/db09-1197. PMC 2809964. PMID 19959762.
- Pikwer M, Bergström U, Nilsson JA, Jacobsson L, Berglund G, Turesson C (2009). "Breast feeding, but not use of oral contraceptives, is associated with a reduced risk of rheumatoid arthritis". Ann Rheum Dis 68 (4): 526–30. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.084707. PMID 18477739.
- "Breastfeeding for six months can delay breast cancer onset by a decade". 2013-08-15. Retrieved 2013-11-03.
- Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
- Widström AM, Wahlberg V, Matthiesen AS, Eneroth P, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Werner S, Winberg J (March 1990). "Short-term effects of early suckling and touch of the nipple on maternal behaviour". Early Hum. Dev. 21 (3): 153–63. doi:10.1016/0378-3782(90)90114-X. PMID 2311552.
- Breastfeeding Benefits: How They Add Up | Breastfeeding Basics
- Renfrew MJ, Lang S, Woolridge MW (2000). "Early versus delayed initiation of breastfeeding". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD000043. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000043. PMID 10796101.
- Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants
- Breastfeeding Frequency from California Pacific Medical Center. Retrieved June 2012.
- Marasco L (Apr–May 1998). "Common breastfeeding myths". Leaven 34 (2): 21–24. Retrieved 2009-09-21.
- Pope Francis encourages mothers to breastfeed - even in the Sistine Chapel | World news | The Guardian
- "Proper positioning and latch-on skills". AskDrSears.com. 2006. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
- Staff, Healthwise. "Breast-feeding: Learning how to nurse". Retrieved 2009-06-17.
- Natural Birth and Baby Care.com
- "Breastfeeding Guidelines". Rady Children's Hospital San Diego. Retrieved 2007-03-04.
- Paul IM, Lehman EB, Hollenbeak CS, Maisels MJ (2006). "Preventable newborn readmissions since passage of the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act". Pediatrics 118 (6): 2349–58. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2043. PMID 17142518.
- Breastmilk: Colostrum, Foremilk and Hindmilk
- Coutsoudis A, Pillay K, Kuhn L, Spooner E, Tsai WY, Coovadia HM (February 2001). "Method of feeding and transmission of HIV-1 from mothers to children by 15 months of age: prospective cohort study from Durban, South Africa". AIDS 15 (3): 379–87. doi:10.1097/00002030-200102160-00011. PMID 11273218.
- Coovadia HM, Rollins NC, Bland RM, Little K, Coutsoudis A, Bennish ML, Newell ML (March 2007). "Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection during exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life: an intervention cohort study". Lancet 369 (9567): 1107–16. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60283-9. PMID 17398310.
- Coutsoudis A, Pillay K, Spooner E, Kuhn L, Coovadia HM (August 1999). "Influence of infant-feeding patterns on early mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Durban, South Africa: a prospective cohort study. South African Vitamin A Study Group". Lancet 354 (9177): 471–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01101-0. PMID 10465172.
- Iliff PJ, Piwoz EG, Tavengwa NV, Zunguza CD, Marinda ET, Nathoo KJ, Moulton LH, Ward BJ, Humphrey JH (April 2005). "Early exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of postnatal HIV-1 transmission and increases HIV-free survival". AIDS 19 (7): 699–708. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000166093.16446.c9. PMID 15821396.
- Iwinski S (2006). "Is Weighing Baby to Measure Milk Intake a Good Idea?". LEAVEN 42 (3): 51–3. Retrieved 2007-04-08.
- LLLI | How can I tell if my baby is getting enough milk?
- "What are the LLLI guidelines for storing my pumped milk?".
- Hanna N, Ahmed K, Anwar M, Petrova A, Hiatt M, Hegyi T (November 2004). "Effect of storage on breast milk antioxidant activity". Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd) 89 (6): F518–20. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.049247. PMC 1721790. PMID 15499145.
- "Maximizing Milk Production with Hands On Pumping".
- Arlene Eisenberg (1989). What to Expect the First Year. Workman Publishing Company. ISBN 0-89480-577-0.
- Sears, W. "Ask Dr. Sears: Leaving Baby for Vacation".
- Spatz DL (2006). "State of the science: use of human milk and breast-feeding for vulnerable infants". J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 20 (1): 51–5. doi:10.1097/00005237-200601000-00017. PMID 16508463.
- Tully DB, Jones F, Tully MR (2001). "Donor milk: what's in it and what's not". J Hum Lact 17 (2): 152–5. doi:10.1177/089033440101700212. PMID 11847831.
- Breast Milk, Breastmilk, Breastfeeding, Breast Feeding - Rehydration Project
- Grunberg R (1992). "Breastfeeding multiples: Breastfeeding triplets". New Beginnings 9 (5): 135–6.
- Australian Breastfeeding Association: Breastfeeding triplets, quads and higher
- Association of Radical Midwives: Breastfeeding triplets
- Flower H (2003). Adventures in Tandem Nursing: Breastfeeding During Pregnancy and Beyond. La Leche League International. ISBN 978-0-912500-97-3.
- Alcorn K (2004-08-24). "Shared breastfeeding identified as new risk factor for HIV". aidsmap. Retrieved 2007-04-10.
- Guardian Unlimited: Not your mother's milk
- Jennifer Baumgardner, Breast Friends, Babble, 2007
- WHO | Breastfeeding
- Breastfeeding: Data: Report Card 2012: Outcome Indicators | DNPAO | CDC
- Douglas Quenqua (March 25, 2013). "Infants Are Fed Solid Food Too Soon, C.D.C. Finds". The New York Times. Retrieved March 25, 2013.
- Baldwin EN (2001). "Extended Breastfeeding and the Law". Breastfeeding Abstracts 20 (3): 19–20.
- Stein MT, Boies EG, Snyder D (2004). "Parental concerns about extended breastfeeding in a toddler". J Dev Behav Pediatr 25 (5 Suppl): S107–11. doi:10.1097/00004703-200410001-00022. PMID 15502526.
- Reamer SB, Sugarman M (1987). "Breastfeeding Beyond Six Months: Mothers' Perceptions of the Positive and Negative Consuquences". Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 33 (2): 93–7. doi:10.1093/tropej/33.2.93. PMID 3586100.
- Myers GJ, Thurston SW, Pearson AT, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Cernichiari E, Clarkson TW (2009). "Postnatal exposure to methyl mercury from fish consumption: a review and new data from the Seychelles Child Development Study". Neurotoxicology 30 (3): 338–49. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2009.01.005. PMC 2743883. PMID 19442817.
- Little RE, Anderson KW, Ervin CH, Worthington-Roberts B, Clarren SK (1989). "Maternal alcohol use during breast-feeding and infant mental and motor development at one year". NEJM 321 (7): 425–30. doi:10.1056/NEJM198908173210703. PMID 2761576.
- Howard CR, Lawrence RA (1998). "Breast-feeding and drug exposure". Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25 (1): 195–217. doi:10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70365-X. PMID 9547767.
- Sun Y, Irie M, Kishikawa N, Wada M, Kuroda N, Nakashima K (2004). "Determination of bisphenol a in human breast milk by HPLC with column-switching andﬂuorescence detection". Biomedical Chromatography 18 (8): 501–507. doi:10.1002/bmc.345. PMID 15386523.
- Ye X, Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL, Calafat AM (2006). "Measuring environmental phenols and chlorinated organic chemicals in breast milk using automated on-line column-switching–high performance liquid chromatography–isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry". Journal of Chromatography B 831 (1–2): 110–115. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.050. PMID 16377264.
- "Weight gain (growth patterns)". AskDrSears.com. Retrieved 2007-04-03.
- Swagerty DL, Walling AD, Klein RM (May 2002). "Lactose intolerance". Am Fam Physician 65 (9): 1845–50. PMID 12018807.
- Bulhões AC, Goldani HA, Oliveira FS, Matte US, Mazzuca RB, Silveira TR (2007). "Correlation between lactose absorption and the C/T-13910 and G/A-22018 mutations of the lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LCT) gene in adult-type hypolactasia". Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 40 (11): 1441–6. doi:10.1590/S0100-879X2007001100004. PMID 17934640.
- Daws, Dilys (August 1997). "The perils of intimacy: Closeness and distance in feeding and weaning". Journal of Child Psychotherapy 23 (2): 179–199. doi:10.1080/00754179708254541.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1994-08-17). "FDA moves to end use of bromocriptine for postpartum breast engorgement". Archived from the original on 2007-12-23. Retrieved 2009-09-22.
- "Breastfeeding: Data: Report Card 2010". U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2011-03-08.
- "Healthy People 2010 : Maternal, Infant, and Child Health". U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved 2011-03-08.
- "Childbirth: Breast-Feeding Ends by 6 Months for Many" article by Roni Caryn Rabin in The New York Times September 27, 2010, accessed September 28, 2010
- Jakobsen MS, Sodemann M, Mølbak K, Aaby P (1996). "Reason for Termination of Breastfeeding and the Length of Breastfeeding". International Journal of Epidemiology 25 (1): 115–21. doi:10.1093/ije/25.1.115. PMID 8666478.
- "Aamir Khan roped in for drive against malnutrition". The Times of India. Retrieved 3 June 2013.
- Rita Linda V. Jimeno (June 4, 2012). "An alarming House bill". The Manila Standard.
- "Fifteenth Congress : House Bill No. 715". House of Representatives of the Philippines.
- Colletto, Priscilla Young (1998). "Beyond Toddlerhood: The Breastfeeding Relationship Continues". LEAVEN 34 (1): 3–5.
- WHO | Dr Laurence Grummer-Strawn
- Pelto GH, Zhang Y, Habicht JP (2010). "Premastication: the second arm of infant and young child feeding for health and survival?". Matern Child Nutr 6 (1): 4–18. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00200.x. PMID 20073131.
- Krebs NF, Westcott JE, Butler N, Robinson C, Bell M, Hambidge KM (2006). "Meat as a first complementary food for breastfed infants: feasibility and impact on zinc intake and status". J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 42 (2): 207–14. doi:10.1097/01.mpg.0000189346.25172.fd. PMID 16456417.
- Dettwyler, Katherine A. (1994). "A Time to Wean". Breastfeeding Abstracts 14 (1): 3–4.
- Breastfeeding - dealing with mastitis | Better Health Channel
- Newman J; Pitman T (2000). Dr. Jack Newman's guide to breastfeeding. HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 0-00-638568-0.
- "Breast Surgery Likely to Cause Breastfeeding Problems". The Implant Information Project of the Nat. Research Center for Women & Families. February 2008.
- "Family Planning - Healthy People 2020". Retrieved 2011-08-18.
- "Breastfeeding-related maternity practices at hospitals and birth centers—United States, 2007". MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 57 (23): 621–5. June 2008. PMID 18551096.
- Office of the Surgeon General (US); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); Office on Women's Health (US) (2011). "Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding". Surgeon General's Call to Action. PMID 21452448.
- Woods NK, Chesser AK, Wipperman J (2013). "Describing adolescent breastfeeding environments through focus groups in an urban community". J Prim Care Community Health 4 (4): 307–10. doi:10.1177/2150131913487380. PMID 23799673.
- Ireland, Jae (20 July 2011). "Will My Breasts Be Ruined After Breastfeeding?". LiveStrong.com. Retrieved 27 Jan 2013.
- Benjamin RM (2011). "Public health in action: give mothers support for breastfeeding". Public Health Rep 126 (5): 622–3. PMC 3151176. PMID 21886320.
- Galson SK (July 2008). "Mothers and children benefit from breastfeeding". Journal of the American Dietetic Association 108 (7): 1106. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.028. PMID 18589012. Retrieved 25 August 2012.
- http://www.savethechildren.org/atf/cf/%7B9def2ebe-10ae-432c-9bd0-df91d2eba74a%7D/STATE-OF-THE-WORLDS-MOTHERS-REPORT-2012-FINAL.PDF[full citation needed]
- Ballard J, Chantry C, Howard CR. "Guidelines for the evaluation and management of neonatal ankyloglossia and its complications in the breastfeeding dyad". ABM Clinical Protocol #11.
- Wolf JH (2008). "Got milk? Not in public!". International breastfeeding journal 3 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-11. PMC 2518137. PMID 18680578.
- "Breastfeeding Legislation in the United States: A General Overview and Implications for Helping Mothers". LEAVEN 41 (3): 51–4. 2005.
- Jordan, Tim; Pile, Steve (eds.) (2002). Social Change. Blackwell. p. 233. ISBN 0-631-23311-3.
- Barsch, Sky (2006-11-14). "Woman alleges she was kicked off Burlington flight for breast-feeding". Burlington Free Press. Retrieved 2007-01-24.
- "Eyeful of breast-feeding mom sparks outrage". Associated Press. 2006-07-27. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- Boyer, K., & Geographies of Care. (March 01, 2011). The way to break the taboo is to do the taboo thing breastfeeding in public and citizen-activism in the UK. Health and Place, 17, 2, 430-437.
- Forbes GB, Adams-Curtis LE, Hamm NR, White KB (2003). "Perceptions of the Woman Who Breastfeeds: The Role of Erotophobia, Sexism, and Attitudinal Variables". Sex Roles 49 (7/8): 379–388. doi:10.1023/A:1025116305434.
- Harmon, A. (2005, June 7). 'Lactivists' Taking Their Cause, and Their Babies, to the Streets. The New York Times. Retrieved November 1, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/07/nyregion/07nurse.html?ex=1275796800&en=0c55cf357d95bd30&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0
- Taylor EN, Wallace LE (2012). "For Shame: Feminism, Breastfeeding Advocacy, and Maternal Guilt". Hypatia 27 (1): 76–98. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01238.x.
- Hausman, B. L. (January 01, 2007). Things (Not) to Do with Breasts in Public: Maternal Embodiment and the Biocultural Politics of Infant Feeding. New Literary History, 38, 3, 479-504.
- Boyer, K. (January 01, 2010). Of care and commodities: breast milk and the new politics of mobile biosubstances. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 1, 5-20.
- "Nestle Boycott Home". INFACT Canada. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- Milking it Joanna Moorhead, The Guardian, May 15, 2007
- "Writers boycott literary festival". BBC News. 27 May 2002. Retrieved 2007-06-07.
- "Innocenti Declaration . On the Protection, Promotion and Support of Breastfeeding". WHO/UNICEF policymakers. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
- Moland, K, Blystad A (2008). "Counting on Mother’s Love: The Global Politics of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Eastern Africa". In Hahn R, Inhorn M. Anthropology and Public Health: Bridging Differences in Culture and Society. Oxford University Press. p. 449.
- White, E. (1999). Breastfeeding and HIV/AIDS: The Research, the Politics, the Women’s Perspectives. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers. p. 12.
- Moland K, De Paoli M, Sellen D, Van Esterik P, Leshbari S, Blystad A (2010). "Breastfeeding and HIV: Experiences from a Decade of Prevention of Postnatal HIV Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa". International Breastfeeding Journal 5 (10): 4. doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-10.
- Stein Z, Kuhn L (2009). "Breast feeding: A time to craft new policies". J Public Health Policy 30 (3): 300–10. doi:10.1057/jphp.2009.23. PMC 2813715. PMID 19806071.
- Wahl A, Swanson MD, Nochi T, Olesen R, Denton PW et al. (2012). "Human Breast Milk and Antiretrovirals Dramatically Reduce Oral HIV-1 Transmission in BLT Humanized Mice". In Silvestri, Guido. PLoS Pathog 8 (6): e1002732. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002732.
- Villamor E, Koulinska IN, Furtado J, Baylin A, Aboud S, Manji K, Campos H, Fawzi WW (2007). "Long-chain n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in breast milk decrease the risk of HIV transmission through breastfeeding". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 86 (3): 682–9. PMID 17823433.
- Moland, K, Blystad A (2008). "Counting on Mother’s Love: The Global Politics of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Eastern Africa". In Hahn R, Inhorn M. Anthropology and Public Health: Bridging Differences in Culture and Society. Oxford University Press. p. 468.
- Moland, K, Blystad A (2008). "Counting on Mother’s Love: The Global Politics of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Eastern Africa". In Hahn R, Inhorn M. Anthropology and Public Health: Bridging Differences in Culture and Society. Oxford University Press. p. 450.
- Baek C, Rutenberg N (2010). "Implementing programs for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-constrained settings: Horizons studies, 1999-2007". Public Health Rep 125 (2): 293–304. PMC 2821859. PMID 20297758.
- Hollen C. "HIV-Positive Women's Responses to Global Policy in Infant Feeding in Canada". Medical Anthropology Quarterly 5 (4): 503.
- Krocker L, Beckwith A (2011). "Safe Infant Feeding in Lesotho in the Eras of HIV/AIDS". Annals of Anthropology Practice 35 (1). p. 59. doi:10.1111/j.2153-9588.2011.01066.x.
- Blystad A, Moland K (2011). "Technologies of Hope? Motherhood, HIV and Infant Feeding in Eastern Africa". Anthropology & Medicine 16 (2).
- Moland, K, Blystad A (2008). "Counting on Mother’s Love: The Global Politics of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Eastern Africa". In Hahn R, Inhorn M. Anthropology and Public Health: Bridging Differences in Culture and Society. Oxford University Press.
- Van Esterik P (2002). "Contemporary Trends in Infant Feeding Research". Annual Review of Anthropology 31: INSERT.
- Moland, K, Blystad A (2008). "Counting on Mother’s Love: The Global Politics of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Eastern Africa". In Hahn R, Inhorn M. Anthropology and Public Health: Bridging Differences in Culture and Society. Oxford University Press. p. 471.
- WHO. HIV and infant feeding: new evidence and programmatic experience: report of a technical consultation held on behalf of the Inter-agency Task Team (IATT) on prevention of HIV infections in pregnant women, mothers and their infants. Geneva, Switzerland, 25–27 October 2006.
- WHO | Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding 2010
- Baumslag N, Michels DL (1995). Milk, money, and madness: the culture and politics of breastfeeding. Westport, Conn.: Bergin & Garvey. ISBN 0-89789-407-3.
- Hausman B (2003). Mother's milk: breastfeeding controversies in American culture. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-96656-6.
- Huggins K (1999). The nursing mother's companion (4th ed.). Boston, Mass.: Harvard Common Press. ISBN 1-55832-152-7.
- Pryor G (1997). Nursing mother, working mother: the essential guide for breastfeeding and staying close to your baby after you return to work. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Common Press. ISBN 1-55832-116-0.
- Wiessinger, D., West, D., Pitman, T. (2010). The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding (8th ed.). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
- Weiss R (2010). Better Way to Breastfeed Your Baby. Beverly, MA: Fair Winds. ISBN 978-1-59233-422-3.
- Palmer G (2009). The Politics of Breastfeeding: when breasts are bad for business, 3rd edition. London: Pinter & Martin. ISBN 978-1-905177-16-5.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Breastfeeding.|
|Look up breastfeeding in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
- Breastfeeding at DMOZ
- Human Milk Secretion: An Overview US National Institute of Health
- Breastfeeding Resources La Leche League International
- Breast-Feeding Content Resources WHO reports on Breast Feeding
- Health risks of not breastfeeding US Department of Health & Human Services
- The World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action (WABA) is a global network of individuals & organisations concerned with the protection, promotion & support of breastfeeding worldwide.
- Breastfeeding: NHS Choices
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention Breastfeeding CDC
- LactMed, a database of the safety of drugs to which breastfeeding mothers may be exposed, by the U.S. National Library of Medicine