Superconducting Super Collider
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Current state of the SSC site. |
|
| Hadron Colliders | |
|---|---|
| Intersecting Storage Rings | CERN, 1971–1984 |
| Super Proton Synchrotron | CERN, 1981–1984 |
| ISABELLE | BNL, cancelled in 1983 |
| Tevatron | Fermilab, 1987–present |
| Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider | BNL, operational since 2000 |
| Superconducting Super Collider | Cancelled in 1993 |
| Large Hadron Collider | CERN, 2009– |
| Very Large Hadron Collider | Theoretical |
The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC), planned to be built mostly in Waxahachie, Texas, would have been the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator complex. Its planned ring circumference was 87.1 kilometres (54.1 mi) with an energy of 20 TeV per beam of protons, more than enough energy to create a Higgs boson, a particle predicted by the Standard Model but not yet detected. The project's director was Roy Schwitters, a physicist at the University of Texas at Austin and Harvard University. The project was canceled in 1993.
Contents |
[edit] Development
The system was first envisioned in the December 1983 National Reference Designs Study, which examined the technical and economic feasibility of a machine with the design capacity of 20 TeV per beam. After an extensive Department of Energy review during the mid-1980s, a site selection process began in 1987. The project was awarded to Texas in November 1988 and major construction began in 1991. Seventeen shafts were sunk and 23.5 km (14.6 mi) of tunnel were bored by late 1993.
[edit] Cancellation
During the design and the first construction stage, a heated debate ensued about the high cost of the project. In 1987, Congress was told the project could be completed for $4.4 billion, but by 1993 the cost projection exceeded $12 billion. A recurring argument was the contrast with NASA's contribution to the International Space Station (ISS), which was of a similar amount.[citation needed] Critics of the project argued that the US could not afford both of them.
Congress canceled the project in 1993. Many factors contributed to the cancellation: rising cost estimates; poor management by physicists and Department of Energy officials; the end of the need to prove the supremacy of American science with the collapse of the Soviet Union; belief that many smaller scientific experiments of equal merit could be funded for the same cost; Congress's desire to generally reduce spending; the reluctance of Texas Governor Ann Richards;[1] and President Bill Clinton's initial lack of support for a project begun during the administrations of Richards's predecessor, Bill Clements, and Clinton's predecessors, Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. However, in 1993, Clinton tried to prevent the cancellation by asking Congress to continue "to support this important and challenging effort" through completion because "abandoning the SSC at this point would signal that the United States is compromising its position of leadership in basic science".[2]
The closing of the SSC had adverse consequences for the southern part of the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, and resulted in a mild recession, most evident in those parts of Dallas which lay south of the Trinity River.[3] When the project was canceled, 22.5 km (14.0 mi) of tunnel and 17 shafts to the surface were already dug, and nearly two billion dollars had already been spent on the massive facility.[4]
[edit] Comparison to the Large Hadron Collider
The SSC's planned collision energy of 40 TeV was almost triple the 14 TeV of its European counterpart, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva. The LHC was less expensive to build because, in addition to its smaller size, the LHC took over the existing engineering infrastructure and 27 km long underground cavern of the Large Electron-Positron Collider.
[edit] Current status of site
After the project was canceled, the main site was deeded to Ellis County, Texas, and the county tried numerous times to sell the property. The property was finally sold in August 2006 to an investment group led by the late J.B. Hunt.[5] Collider Data Center has contracted with GVA Cawley to market the site as a tier III or tier IV data center.[6]
[edit] See also
- Fermilab
- DESY
- Einstein's Bridge, a science fiction novel about the SSC
[edit] References
- ^ Alvin W. Trivelpiece (2005). "Some Observations on DOE's Role in Megascience" (PDF). History of Physics Forum, American Physical Society. http://www.aps.org/units/fhp/FHPnews/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=67517. Trivelpiece recounts hearing "about a conversation between the Governor of Texas, the Honorable Ann Richards, and President Clinton early in his administration. He asked her if she wanted to fight for the SSC. She said no. That meant it would no longer be an administration imperative."
- ^ President Bill Clinton (June 16, 1993). "Letter to William H. Natcher, Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations". http://www.hep.net/ssc/new/history/hepssc/clinton.html. The letter reads in part, "As your Committee considers the Energy and Water Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1994, I want you to know of my continuing support for the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC). ... Abandoning the SSC at this point would signal that the United States is compromising its position of leadership in basic science—a position unquestioned for generations. These are tough economic times, yet our Administration supports this project as a part of its broad investment package in science and technology. ... I ask you to support this important and challenging effort."
- ^ Jeffrey Mervis (October 3, 2003). "Scientists are long gone, but bitter memories remain". Science 302 (5642): 40–41. doi:. PMID 14526052. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?volume=302&firstpage=40&search_citation-search.x=0&search_citation-search.y=0&search_citation-search=search.
- ^ Jeffrey Mervis and Charles Seife (October 3, 2003). "Lots of reasons, but few lessons". Science 302 (5642): 38–40. doi:. PMID 14526051. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?volume=302&firstpage=38&search_citation-search.x=0&search_citation-search.y=0&search_citation-search=search.
- ^ Christine Perez (18 August 2006). GVA Cawley to market former super collider. http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2006/08/21/newscolumn6.html. Collider Data Center, LLC,
- ^ "High Profile Superconducting Super Collider Project from Early 90's Sees New Life". Superconductor Week. August 16, 2006. http://www.superconductorweek.com/pr/0806tgj/scsc1.htm.
- The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? by Leon Lederman, Dick Teresi, ISBN 0-385-31211-3
- A Hole In Texas by Herman Wouk, Fiction, Little, Brown, ISBN 0-316-52590-1
- The Dead Collider by Bruce Sterling, F&SF Science column #13 (July, 1994)
- A Tale of Two Cultures: Building the Superconducting Super Collider, 1988-1993 by Michael Riordan. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32(1), pp. 125–144 (Fall, 2001)
- The Demise of the Superconducting Super Collider by Michael Riordan. Physics in Perspective, 2(4), pp. 411–425 (December, 2000)
- The Superconducting Super Collider Project: A Summary, in High Energy Physics Advisory Panel's Subpanel on Vision for the Future of High Energy Physics, Sidney D. Drell, Chair. U.S. Department of Energy (May, 2004)
- The Decline and Fall of the SSC by John G. Cramer
- The SSC Low Energy Booster (ed. H.-Ulrich Wienands) IEEE Press, 1997, ISBN 0-7803-1164-7
[edit] External links
- SSC website
- Tour [1]
Coordinates: 32°21′51″N 96°56′38″W / 32.36417°N 96.94389°W