Summum bonum
|
|
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. (Consider using more specific cleanup instructions.) Please help improve this article if you can. The talk page may contain suggestions. (June 2010) |
Summum bonum is an expression used in philosophy, particularly in medieval philosophy and in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, to describe the ultimate importance, the singular and most ultimate end which human beings ought to pursue. The summum bonum is generally thought of as being an end in itself, and at the same time containing all other goods. In Christian philosophy, the highest good is usually defined as the life of the righteous, the life led in Communion with God and according to god's precepts.
The concept, as well as the philosophical and theological consequences drawn from the purported existence of a more or less clearly defined summum bonum, could be traced back to the earliest forms of monotheism: for instance, Zoroastrianism and Judaism[citation needed]. In the Western world, the concept was introduced by the neoplatonic philosophers[citation needed], and described as a feature of the Christian god by Saint Augustine in De natura boni (On the Nature of Good, written circa 399). Augustine denies the positive existence of absolute evil, describing a world with God as the supreme good at the center, and defining different grades of evil as different stages of remoteness from that center[citation needed].
Experience soon teaches that all desires cannot be satisfied, that they are conflicting, and that some goods must be foregone in order to secure others. Hence the necessity of weighing the relative value of goods, of classifying them, and of ascertaining which of them must be procured at the loss of others. The result is the division of goods into two great classes, the physical and the moral, happiness and virtue[citation needed]. Within either class it is comparatively easy to determine the relation of particular good things to one another, but it has proved far more difficult to fix the relative excellence of the two classes of virtue and happiness[citation needed].
[edit] Summum bonum and judgments
Judgments on the highest good have generally fallen into four categories:
- Utilitarianism, when the highest good is identified with the maximum possible psychological happiness for the maximum number of people;
- Eudaemonism or Virtue Ethics, when the highest good is identified with flourishing;
- Rational Deontologism, when the highest good is identified with virtue or duty;
- Rational Eudæmonism, or tempered Deontologism, when both virtue and happiness are combined in the highest good.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
The Wiktionary entry for summum bonum
"The Highest Good". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1913.
Chisholm, Hugh, ed (1911). "summum bonum". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company.
| This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This Christian theology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |