Surveillance abuse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Surveillance abuse is the use of surveillance methods or technology to monitor the activity of an individual or group of individuals in a way which violates the social norms or laws of a society.

During the FBI's COINTELPRO operations, there was widespread surveillance abuse which targeted political dissidents, primarily people from the political left and civil rights movement.

Other abuses include "LOVEINT" which refers to the practice of secret service employees using their extensive monitoring capabilities to spy on their love interest or spouse.[1]

There is no prevention in the amount of unauthorized data collected on individuals and this leads to cases where cameras are installed inappropriately. “For instance, according to the BBC, four council workers in Liverpool used a street CCTV pan-tilt-zoom camera to spy on a woman in her apartment.” (Cavallaro,2007). This is just one case where culprits have been caught; however, there are still many common acts such as this. Another incident of inappropriate installation now has “Pennsylvania parents suing their son's school, alleging it watched him through his laptop's webcam while he was at home and unaware he was being observed.” (Surveillance Camera Players, 2010). This leads to the misconception of surveillance, as it once was a tool to monitor and make sure citizens abide by the law, it has now created even more problems. With cameras only becoming more advanced and more common, it is difficult to determine whether these surveillance cameras are helping to ensure a safe society or leading to bigger issues altogether.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  • Davis, James Kirkpatrick. (1997). Assault on the Left: The FBI and the Sixties Antiwar Movement. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Donner, Frank J. (1980). The Age of Surveillance: The Aims and Methods of America’s Political Intelligence System. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Donner, Frank J. (1990). Protectors of Privilege: Red Squads and Police Repression in Urban America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Fijnaut, Cyrille and Gary T. Marx. (1995). Under Cover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  • Marx, Gary T. (1988).Under Cover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: Twentieth Century Fund/University of California Press.
  • Ney York Civil Liberties Union. (2006). Who's Watching
  • O'Reilly, Kenneth. (1988). "Racial Matters:" The FBI's Secret File on Black America, 1960—1972. New York: Free Press.
  • Staples, William G. (2000). Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodern Life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Cavallaro, Andrea. (March 2007). Privacy in Video Surveillance. IEEE Xplore - Signal Processing Magazine. Retrieved from http://ssli.ee.washington.edu/courses/ee299/hws/hw4_files/privacy.pd. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  • Kampfner, John. (2012, October 3). Big Brother is watching you more closely than ever: CCTV cameras, the spies in our midst. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212536/CCTV-cameras-The-spies-midst.html#ixzz2OPdQPUjk. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  • Schools are gathering CCTV evidence illegally as every one breaks strict guidelines (2008, May 14). Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-566338/Schools-gathering-CCTV-evidence-illegally-breaks-strict-guidelines.html#ixzz2PTaqXytd. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  • Surveillance Camera Players (2010, April 12). Abuse of Surveillance Cameras. Retrieved from http://www.notbored.org/camera-abuses.html. Retrieved May 3, 2013.