Talk:1985

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Years (Rated List-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Contents

[edit] Format

26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 got a condensed Table of Contents after 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:37 26-June-2007

[edit] 2004 page layout years

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 13:49, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Days of week

Are the days of the week really necessary? And why do we have to repeat that we're talking about 1985 on every line? This is the 1985 article. I think it's obvious that the dates given are from 1985.

[edit] April 30, 2009 trim

I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 01:02, April 30 2009 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.

[edit] Eastburn murder

What about the Eastburn murder —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.77.83 (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Year articles are only for world events: the case you mention is not notable outside the US: Double Jeopardy#Separate sovereigns. Jim Michael (talk) 03:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export