|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
Talk:Animal Rights Militia/Archive 1
[edit] Source
Guardian, Independent, BBC as well as local newspaper are fine. Also, books published by a legit publishing house like Lantern is fine. Animal right advocacy sites or books published by a publishing house which does not even have its own website are not reliable sources.Vapour (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- These groups are reliable sources in articles about themselves; see WP:QS. I agree that the article could use some tidying, but it should be done carefully within the policies, and checking what the sources actually say. It's an AR article I've neglected for a long time, so I'll try to pay it more attention and slowly fix it up. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 14:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
