Talk:Anti-LGBT

Reader Interest: This page is too derogatory against those people who don't condone the gay lifestyle. I point to it in my class and get ridiculed by fellow teachers as it is too negative and biased to one side.

Dopamine

Dopamine can refer to more than one thing:
Look up Dopamine in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
    * Dopamine is this.
    * Dopamine (Film) is a Film.
{{disambig}}
</noinclude>

What the hell is this doing on this page, and how do I get rid of it? I tried editing the page but there is no code for it. The disambig template is not showing up but there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it or the link with it. I'm confused. I think we broke the Wikipedia. - AdelaMae ^{(talk - contribs)} 20:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay, never mind, it's gone now. *shakes head in bewilderment* - AdelaMae ^{(talk - contribs)} 20:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Removal of NPOV tag

There was no dispute, so the NPOV tag was unwarranted. Consequently, the tag has been removed. If someone is confused or disagrees as to what can be called anti-LGBT, then that political discussion must be held elsewhere since the article itself is neither a springboard or a forum for debates. --CJ Withers (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

There is a dispute as I as an editor on wiki have raised one. The concern is the themes under Anti-LGBT are all negative and do not reflect general theological, social or culture objections as Anti --meaning against the lifestyle. thus the reader is left to believe that being anti- is excusively associated with terms like homophobia etc. As per the rules a talk page is the procedure before this tag can be removed. Thank Q for being civil. No page on wiki is owned by any one group of people or clique. --Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 17:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

You are reading into things since "the reader" you bring up is only yourself: no other reader or editor made your claims or similar ones. In any case, the dispute tag is, once again, unwarranted as there is no dispute. Second, I should like to remind you that you tagged the article first without discussing the topic on the talk page at all, i.e. until my interventions. That is the main reason why I removed it: the person who placed it there did not discuss the issue. Third, your blurb for placing it there in the first place was in, no offense, barely intelligible English. Therefore, there is no dispute because I neither support or reject what you are trying to convey, nor is anyone else here so far.

Please add what you think is missing instead of resorting to the NPOV tag. If indeed something vital, reliable, and verifiable is missing, please add it. I'd be happy to correct it so that native speakers like myself can access its point. It would be a great service to use a sandbox first and then ask for input as the point you're trying to make is lost in translation. Thank you. --CJ Withers (talk) 20:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

• Comment, this is a disambiguation page not an article. We should take care to present items here neutrally but they remain simply a list of articles and brief descriptions to help our readers find the articles they are looking for. I'm re-removing the NPOV tag as it indeed seems misplaced. If anyone objects please explain it detail which entry you feel should be reworded and perhaps even suggest what that wording should be. -- Banjeboi 22:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the suggestion. However I strongly disagree with CJ argument that "no one else has an issue" that is not a logically counter-argument. Thats like saying well your objections are not valid because you are the 1st to say these things. Where in wikipedia logic is that a valid position? So if i complain to Walmart they can say "no one else has a problem -- just you"? Anyway as an editor (not of this topic) and a reader it seems the portal points to adversely negative things. As a reader I am looking for Anti-LGBT positions which are not all violent and hateful. like biologist, academics, churches etc. --Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 15:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

This is not a proper disambiguation page. The terms on the page (except for the book, which has a title different from the title of the page) are merely variations on a broad theme. bd2412 T 20:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)