Talk:Baltimore riot of 1861
| WikiProject Maryland / Baltimore | (Rated C-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Baltimore riot of 1861 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 4 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Archive : error pointed out
The article starts off referring to April 12, 1861 as being "just five days before" April 19, 1861. This does not inspire confidence in the reader that this article contains other serious inaccuracies.
[edit] Start Class
This article has been returned to start class, primarily since it has not beenc chcecked against the requirments for B class. --NeoNerd 12:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] First Union casualty
No, that happened during the 100-gun salute at Fort Sumter
Randy Golden (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crime in Maryland
My addition of this article to the Crime in Maryland category was reverted as "digressive", a term which the editor seems to like using lately. Since the activity accompanying the riot was a crime and occurred in Maryland, I believe it should be included under this category. I'd be fine with using a more specific subcategory, such as "Riots in Maryland" or "Crime in Baltimore", though none currently exist. Comments? —ADavidB 13:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Msking a subcategory of Crime in Maryland which lists the various riots already lumped together in the main category (which by the way appears to be nonrepresentative of the material) would be one way to resolve the dispute. Tedickey (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
The article is now one of four in the Riots and civil unrest in Baltimore category, a subcategory of Crime in Maryland. —ADavidB 04:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Incorrect Statement
The article's opening indicates that the conflict involved "infantrymen of the United States Army." This is incorrect, as the unit in question (6th Massachusetts Volunteer Militia, Co. C,D,I and L) were not regular army, nor had they been yet mustered into Federal service. (That happened AFTER they reached Washington.)
I would suggest that phrase be corrected to read "members of the Massachusetts militia".
Temporaryhero (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class American Civil War articles
- American Civil War task force articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Maryland articles
- Low-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland Baltimore Task Force articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles