Talk:Bison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Mammals (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Wikipedia CD Selection
WikiProject icon Bison is included in the Wikipedia CD Selection, see Bison at Schools Wikipedia. Please maintain high quality standards; if you are an established editor your last version in the article history may be used so please don't leave the article with unresolved issues, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the DVDs.
 

Contents

[edit] Buffalo vs. Bear

The "brown bear" wikipedia page says that a brown bear can kill a buffalo in "a single blow". I personally have been having a year long argument with my wife that buffalo are, clearly, more dangerous then bears. I would like input.

In my oppion buffalo could easily kill a bear or at least escape it. Even though Bears have a good amount of spead, a buffalo could easily get away. A Buffalo would easily outsize a Bear. Dragonrider27 (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

However for some younger buffalo, even a wolf or lynx could bring them down Dragonrider27 (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I just learned that a grizzly could bring down an older adult who was a little more feeble.Dragonrider27 (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Confusion

People also often confuse buffalo with bison but it's very easy to tell them apart: you can't wash your hands in a buffalo. ;-) -- Tarquin 00:39 Oct 29, 2002 (UTC)

Don't you mean basin? You wash your hands in a basin - Buffalo and bison are 2 different kinds of animals.76.202.217.159 21:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation

There does not appear to be a page for the genus Bison. Would it not be better to move this page to Bison (disambiguation) and then make this the genus page? — Pekinensis 04:21, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with African Buffalo

Can we merge this with African Buffalo66.97.206.81 16:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bison vs. buffalo?

Quote from article: "Bison are distinct from buffalo." Could somebody explain why, other than they haven't been domesticated?

Here's some research I've done:

  • [1] says, "There is no difference. Bison is the scientific name and it's really bison-bison; but we all know the common name as buffalo. It's sort of like comparing canine to dog, or feline to cat (does that make sense?)."
  • [2] Frank says, "Technically, a bison (Bison bison) is the type of hebivorous hoofed animal of the Bovine family found in the US, Europe and a few other areas but a buffalo is anatomically different. Bison have a well developed hump over the sholders but bufflao lack that. Bison have fairly thick coats but buffalo Bubalus bubalus) have little hair (except as juveniles) and either take mud baths or dust baths to protect their skin from sun burn. Bison horns are relatively small compared to buffalo that can reach five feet or more from tip to tip. Most buffalo can be domesticated (except for the Cape Buffalo of Southern Africa which is a very dangerous animal) but bison do not even tame well."

Some other questions I have: Why is this difference important? To show you're more educated or have studied biology? Is this prescriptive vocabulary - similar to trying to teach people the difference between "among" and "between" when the difference is not really important?

And finally, does the word "bison" really need to be capitalized? I know it's a genus thing, but when I'm reading about bison, I'm reading about the animal, not the genus. I'm going to look up "cat" and if it's capitalized, I'm going to have kittens! --Dblomgren 05:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

I found this Wikipage [3] that basically says there's no standard policy on capitalizaton of common species names. I'm going to be bold and uncapitalize the word bison. If anyone objects, let me know. --DBlomgren 03:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Bison migrate from Aug. to Sept.

[edit] Colorado reintroduction confusing

On March 16, 2007, 15 American bison were re-introduced to Colorado to roam where they did over a century ago. A herd of 15 bison has been established in the 17,000-acre (69 km²) Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge, a former chemical weapons manufacturing site.

This is confusing... does each sentence refer to the same herd or to a different one? -Rolypolyman 13:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indian Bison

Somebody vandalized Indian Bison as 'Indian Buffalo' and Mr John Hill deleted the Image without any discussion. This is again vandalism. One should not delete unless he is an expert and it should not be done without discussion. Here it is important to know that Indian Bison is the species Bos gauraus, locally known as Gaur. It is not buffalo. It is the Indian Bison. Hence the Image again added to the article. --burdak 03:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Why I moved the image of the so-called "Indian Bison": It seems that Mr. Burdak has not read the article on bison from which I moved the image. It very clearly says: "Bison is a taxonomic group containing six species of large even-toed ungulates within the subfamily Bovinae. Only two of these species still exist: the American Bison (B. bison) and the European Bison, or wisent (B. bonasus)."
In fact the article on Bison states very clearly: "The gaur, a large, thick-coated ox found in Asia, is also known as the Indian Bison, although it is in the genus Bos and thus not a true bison."
This means that, even though the Gaur is sometimes referred to as the "Indian Bison" - this is an incorrect naming (rather like the American Bison being called a Buffalo - which it is not). So, it should not be pictured on the bison page.
I will, therefore, move this image once again - to its proper place in the article on the Gaur (Bos gaurus). John Hill 04:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Query - do bison really get up front end first?

When I lived in southern Alberta in the early 1970s, the dairy farmer I was renting from said all his cows were deliberately bred to be one sixteenth "buffalo" (read "bison) as this gave them the great advantage of standing up front end first rather than rear end first (as domestic cattle do). This meant that the cross-bred cattle did not smother in snow drifts - an important advantage in Alberta. He also said that this did not work if they were less than one sixteenth "buffalo" and, if they were more than one than one sixteenth buffalo they didn't give as much milk.

I have no idea if this is true or not. Can anyone please confirm or deny this for me (with references if possible)? Many thanks, John Hill 21:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

It does seem that bison get up front end first. I found a paper about this: Lidfors, L, (1989) "The use of getting up and lying down movements in the evaluation of cattle environments", Veterinary Research Communications, Volume 13, Number 4, 307-324. The body of this paper is locked to the non-paying public, but Google can see the text and I've managed to extract this quote: "However, there are two bovid species, yak (Bos grunniens) and visent (Bison bonasus), which diverge from this pattern and get up via the sitting posture...". It only mentions European bison (wisent or "visent"), but your anecdote suggests that it applies to American bison too.
Was your farmer definitely a dairy farmer, or a beef farmer? Bison are sometimes crossed with cattle for beef, but I've never heard of it for dairy, and it would be unusual for dairy cattle to be out in the snow; I'd have thought that one sixteenth bison would depress milk yields quite a bit. I'm also not convinced that cattle suffocate in the snow from getting up rear end first, as they'd just dip their faces in for a moment. More likely they have shorter fur and need better forage and so are just less hardy.
It is very curious indeed that such closely related animals as yak, cattle and bison should get up differently (cattle are close enough to both to interbreed). I wonder if it is to do with the relative weight of the front and rear ends? Cattle rock forwards onto their knees, then stand up their hind legs, then rock back onto the hind legs and stand up the front ones; it's done with quite a bit of coordination, and if they get it wrong they go back down. Perhaps if bison or yak did it this way, their much heavier heads would rock them over forwards onto their noses, or they would not be able to rock back onto their hind legs enough to stand up the front ones. With a relatively heavy head, they can stand up the front legs, then rock over them to stand up the hind ones. Horses also get up front end first, and although their heads are not that heavy, they have much longer necks in proportion than cattle so they balance further forward. They first sit up like a dog, then push up with their hind legs.
I wonder about other heavy-fronted animals such as rhinos, giraffes and musk oxen? And what about other cattle such as water buffalo, never mind deer, antelope and other hoofed animals? I shall be watching wildlife films even more closely from now on... Richard New Forest (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Habitat

What is the bison's Habitat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.51.232.18 (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Low importance?

The American bison was, 200 years ago, the most numerous large land animal that ever lived and the most important animal for th subsistence of native Americans and Europeans on the Great Plains. I would rate the importance of a good article on bison of high importance -- not low importance as the mammal group has done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallchief (talkcontribs) 17:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export