 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Capital letter[s]? vs. lower-case
i think bitch should be spelled lower case Bitch >> bitch and that it should be reffered to as simply as Bitch and not Bitch magazene in the thumb image boxes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- support both changes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
-
Done. (sorta) (maybe not completely, but it's a start). --97.124.112.237 (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Does the current article strike anyone else as sounding far too much like a promotional summary? Crito2161 02:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. In fact, it doesn't just strike anyone reading it as such, it bitch slaps them with the self promotional.
[edit] Secondary Sources
The book cited as a reference is not independent of the subject. VegetativePup (talk) 02:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's a number of secondary sources that could be included. I'm removing this as a candidate for deletion. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/09/03/andi_zeisler_and_lisa_jervis/ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/magazine/06wwln_q4.html http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-08-20/books/17308903_1_pop-culture-social-change-anthology http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=feminist_media_in_a_time_of_economic_trouble http://eastbaymonthly.com/kilduff-02-07.html http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/01/lewinsky-affair http://www.msmagazine.com/winter2004/thirdwave.asp
--75.148.87.230 (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] undated e-mail used as source in "Mission Statement" section
Currently the only footnote in the "Mission Statement" section, is footnote [6] which says [quote! from the wikitext]: "<ref>an email from Jaymee Jacoby</ref>". Is it me, or does that seem a bit strange, for a source for a footnote in a Wikipedia article? It does not even give the [time and] date of the e-mail message. It does specify the sender, and the recipient is probably not necessary to document -- (I guess.) Just my 0.02; Any comments? --97.124.112.237 (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
