|
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other concerns about edits related to a living person, please report the issue to the biographies of living persons noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help with issues related to it, please see this page. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject The X Factor, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The X Factor on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Untitled
Translation of the Portuguese version of this text, plus additional information from www.cerrone.net (Cerrone's official web site) - João Xavier M.Santos, Brazil
Is Greg Cerrone the son of Jean Marc Cerrone? If so, perhaps we should mention it.
Cerrone IV: The Golden Touch was a smash hit? That was the start of the end of my interest with Cerrone. It was poor music, with self-congratulatory sleeve notes. I persevered with Cerrone V: Angelina, then gave up - nothing really matched Supernature, even the earlier albums. Cerrone's Paradise is embarrassing now with the fake-sex talk making him up to be a fantastic lover. His other best material was with Kongas.
The main article does not touch upon his apparent conversion to Buddhism, as is apparent on his website; and no discussion at all as to how he might regard his junior days through the eyes of Buddhism today.
- Presently the whole article is full of POV, fancruft and virtually unreferenced throughout. Can someone with a knowledge of the subject matter, and Wiki editing skills, try to improve the situation. The above comments (although sadly unsigned) seem to be valid, but the whole thing is such a mess at the moment - how did it ever get a 'C' classification ?! Thank you,
- Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
