Talk:List of content management systems

WikiProject Systems     (Rated List-Class)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to Systems science.
Systems rating:	List Class	Low importance	Field: Systems
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. ZMS is missing. http://www.zms-publishing.com/index_eng.html ZMS is a free open source CMS-solution, excellently suitable for hospitals, research, institutions and international SME. The underlying efficiency-oriented publication model is the result of many consulting projects in the recent years with CMS products usual in the market. Modularity of the ZMS components and approved production processes turn ZMS into an uncomparably rapid tool. ZMS uses the open source application server ZOPE and is optimised for the building of structured contents. Greetings Silva is missing. http://www.infrae.com/products/silva Silva is another CMS based on ZOPE, and BSD-licensed, too. For the commercial offerings, two big players are missing, too: RedDot http://websolutions.opentext.com/ and Day http://www.day.com/ But please also see the note about "Open Source first" near the bottom of the page. I also contest the claim that Django and some of the other listings, are in fact content management systems, but several of them are rather a bunch of libraries to aid creation such applications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.221.127.48 (talk) 08:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Please add CMS ASP NET

CMS ASP NET (www.cmsaspnet.com) is a free GPL open source CMS for ASP.NET Framework 4.0 - does not use the database, with forums and gallery integrated, with social functions, wiki functions. Native multi-language, multi server, multi domains (one installation permit the managment of multiple web domains) last version 2.0 dated 13/06/2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.237.189.149 (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Please add web2py to python section

It is already here. Databases: Firebird, IBM DB2, Informix, Ingres, Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and Google App Engine (copied from that article)

i am a User at german wiki.

edit: i see... it is under web application frameworks. So lets change the first paragraph from ...

This is a list of notable content management systems that are used to organize and facilitate collaborative content creation. Many of them are built on top of separate content management frameworks.

... to ...

This is a list of notable content management systems that are used to organize and facilitate collaborative content creation. Many of them are built on top of separate content management frameworks or web application frameworks

Nils —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.226.0.1 (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Categorisation

I'm confused as to why this article is categorised by platform as it's a fairly minor consideration, all told.

If a more appropriate differentiator can't be found, all items should end up in a single table. The table(s) should list features as well as technical information. Does it have blogs, wiki, comments, rss, workflow, multiple users, plugins, skinning, etc.

Currently all the mature CMS software is lost amongst the masses of startups, and this page provides little to no benefit to anybody. Phwoar (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

can you my CMS ?

I also think the implementation language classification is not a good primary index of the great variety of CMS's. There are different purposes, different storage ideas, different end uses, and more. One idea is to have multiple pages to allow different classifications to organize the tables. A simple idea is to allow sort by each column. An easy 1st step. Other more subjective organizing criteria might justify separate pages. Johnswolter (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

CMS++

Based on Java, Struts, Ajax, DWR, jQuery. Very easy to use. Very rich functions. Multiling, workflow, structured pages based on a flexible XML structure, function drag & drop and more .. http://www.mediaplusplus.com/

Can you add CMS++ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abenjell (talk • contribs) 01:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

CompactCMS

{{editsemiprotected}} I'd like to include my open source CMS. It meets all requirements to be listed for as far as I can tell. If not I'd like to hear where to improve.

ArcaCMF PHP MySQL 0.1 GPLv3 18th May 2009

Best regards. potomak (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Cotonti CMS added

Added Cotonti to PHP CMS list. New release as of Feb. 1 2009. http://www.cotonti.com Jslowik (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

CompactCMS

{{editsemiprotected}} I'd like to include my open source CMS. It meets all requirements to be listed for as far as I can tell. If not I'd like to hear where to improve.

CompactCMS PHP MySQL 1.3.1 GPL 9th Feb 2009

Best regards.

It does not look like CompactCMS has a article on wikipedia. It needs to meet the notability requirements for inclusion in wikipedia first and then can be listed here. 16x9 (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Other proprietary CMS suggestion

{{editsemiprotected}}

* Name: jNetPublish
* Platform: J2EE
* Supported databases: mySQL, Oracle, MSSQL, ... (any JDBC)
* Latest stable: 3.4.0
* Url: http://www.etnetera.cz/etn/en/solutions/products/jnp.html

See above. 16x9 (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

ImpressCMS

ImpressCMS has been updated on 2009/3/8. Version 1.1.2 Final available. I can't edit this page and I hope someone can and will :( Source --by alopix (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Y Done - updated 16x9 (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

TYPOlight

{{editsemiprotected}}

* Name: TYPOlight
* Language: PHP
* Supported databases: mySQL
* Latest stable: 2.8.3
* Date: 1 MAY 2010
* License: LGPL
* Url: http://www.typolight.org/index.html

--93.197.157.202 (talk) 11:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Which section should it go in?--Aervanath (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

* 3.3 (Free and Open Source Software -> PHP)

Declined as there is no article, previous article deleted as spam. 16x9 (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Updated version data Computino (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

A Solution to many of these problems

Why don't we simply branch off all of these sections in their own articles? We could have a "Comparison of PHP CMS Software" and a "Comparison of .NET CMS Software". This would allow the inclusion of an increased number of software to be listed, as well as a more detailed analysis of them all. Right now, there are simply too to many items, with too little information to really be of any use to anyone.

Additionally, while weblog software is "CMS" software, it is in a completely different scope than Software like Joomla! or Drupal, and so I propose and "Comparison of Weblog Software" be branched off of this as well since a person looking to start a blog isn't interesting in creating a full website in the scope of Joomla! and vice versa. This would also cut down on the clutter and make comparisons easier. I know this would require a fair amount of work, but removing items to simplify this page is only going to disagreement. Bragr (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Additionally we all ready have a Weblog Software page so those items being listed here are redundant. They should be removed and a comparison done there. I would like to go forward with this, but I would like the concurrence of other members involved in this page. Bragr 17:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

It would be nice to have specific different categories like Weblog and CMS and PHP and .NET CMS but would also like that there is back-links to each other. Then it makes sense as well.Shirishag75 (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site to list out every cms there is. If you want that go to [CMS Matrix]. This page and all pages are for noteworthy items only and this will never change. So, no I don't agree with your proposition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.208.43.89 (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

• I vote to have the page removed completely. The page is a never ending battle of what is noteworthy and will never end. This page really serves no purpose other than to provide free advertising for companies. Just make the page links off to sites like cmsmatrix and that would end this insanity for good. cmsguy123 —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC).

The battle about what's noteworthy doesn't only take place on this page. The criteria for noteworthiness are quite clear, and it doesn't make sense to remove this page because it's a "never-ending battle". Many other valuable pages are also battlegrounds, and this page, as a list of notable CMS', is valuable to readers. Greenman (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

• The criteria for noteworthiness is not clear, otherwise we would not have to lock the page to keep people from adding non-noteworthy products every day. I think that if we implement a simply policy it would solve most of the problems.

Wikipedia:Notability clearly lists the criteria for article notability. Once a CMS has its own article, it can appear on this list - WP:WTAF. The page gets locked because people ignore the criteria. The policy is simple and clear. Trying to create separate criteria, as per cmsguy123's comment below, is not simple or clear. Greenman (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

"No product can be added to this page unless it has no less than 3 external third party articles written about "the product" (not the company) by other websites/magazines/books/television that are well known, reputable and preferably noteworthy enough to be in wikipedia. Blog articles do not count. Press releases do not count. Product announcements do not count. Company mergers, purchases, and or acquisition announcements do not count." cmsguy123 —Preceding undated comment added 18:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC).

Protected?

What is it with protecting articles? Do you think after you lift the protection the spammers will stay away, or do you want to make Wikipedia less free?

Anyway, {{editsemiprotected}}Radiant (software) released v0.7.0 on 2009-02-07, I would have quickly updated the article but now I have to abuse the talk page for it.--87.162.41.35 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

concrete5

I would recommend adding concrete5 to this list, pending its status as a legitimate article on Wikipedia. Waykup (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree, if it stays then it should be added here. 16x9 (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Drupal update

Drupal's latest release is 6.12 as of May 13th, 2009. Could you please add me as an editor of this page so I can make future updates? Thanks, Darrell Dduane (talk) 15:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}} Opencms update

Latest release is 7.5.2 on 20th of Jan 2010.

195.172.218.238 (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}} Drupal Version and Date update

Drupal is now at 6.12 and dated 5-13-2009 Curretnly shown as 6.10 from february See http://drupal.org for confirmation.

To be able to edit this page, you must be an autoconfirmed user. I will make the change. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 20:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

New CMS in ASP.NET section Civinext Croupware

{{editsemiprotected}}

Not done for now: It needs an article first. 16x9 (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC) ASP.NET

|Civinext Groupware |ASP.NET |SQL Server |2005 | | |-

Wordpress - 2.8

{{editsemiprotected}} Hey, could someone update Wordpress's version # to 2.8 and the date to 2009-06-11. Thank you very much. Linky

Done Celestra (talk) 02:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}} Sense/Net 6.0

Sense/Net 6.0 is an Open Source ECMS/CMS/WCMS for ASP.NET. I think it should be listed, has some nice features. Still beta, there is a forming community around it. Sense/Net webpage

Also, why there is no .NET and ASP.NET category within the Open Source? There are some nice examples, like Umbraco, DNN is in the Other category..

Graffiti CMS

This is a really great CMS for .NET. They offer a free version and corporate versions. http://graffiticms.com/ Here's some positive reviews on this program: http://phatnews.com/tg/home/blog/graffiti-cms-is-certifiably-awesome/ http://www.cmswire.com/cms/cms-reviews/quick-take-review-telligents-graffiti-web-content-management-004039.php

198.238.208.2 (talk) 22:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

TangoCMS

A new version of TangoCMS (2.3.0 Dolphin) has been released (2009-06-29), the page needs updating accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.206.182 (talk) 19:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

TangoCMS 2.5.3 was released on the 6th April ([1]) - can the listing be updated please? AlexC223 (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

SilverStripe CMS

{{editsemiprotected}}

There has been a new version of SilverStripe CMS released - 2.3.2 released 2009-06-19.

Question: Welcome and thanks, do you have a reference? Celestra (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Mura CMS

What about Mura?

http://www.getmura.com/

http://mura.riaforge.org/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.170.173.254 (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

What about adding a table of all the ColdFusion CMSs (for that matter)? dbabbitt (talk) 12:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Missing Column?

There is a lot of info here about how these systems are implemented and licensed but not WHAT THEY ARE FOR!

The term "Content Management System" can mean many things and such systems can be used in many ways.

For more on this please see the Content Management Systems article, particularly the list under:

"Content management systems take the following forms:"

It would be helpful to add a column to the tables in this article that provides some indication of the main intended use(s) or audience(s) of each system. Perhaps the tags included in this column could be derived from the aforementioned list in the aforementioned article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.248.11 (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Flat-File CMS "pivot"

The link is not correct, as it redirects to a disambiguation page which doesn't contain any reference to "pivot" (as a CMS, I mean). However, their website is: http://www.pivotlog.net/, if this may help you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.155.31 (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

"Others" which should be in "PHP"

Some of the items in "Others" (3.6) are written in PHP, but appear to have been separated due to their use of Smarty (XOOPS, Serendipity, Zikula) or XSLT (Xaraya). I'd like to suggest that these should be moved into the "PHP" (3.3) table as there's no reason to separate them: they're PHP. I noticed that Xaraya is already in the main table... 1.1.5, while the one in Others is 1.1.3, 10 months older, but it mentions SQLite and SQL Server support which the other doesn't. They need merging (by someone who can check up on it). Also, Django isn't a CMS in itself - though there are packages for it to make it a CMS. It should be removed from here (and possibly some such packages added). Chris Morgan (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Non-notable entries

As is the convention in lists such as these (Wikipedia:LIST), only entries with an associated article should be listed. To add an entry here, an article should first be created. I will start to remove the entries without an article shortly, after giving some time for people to start on entries they may have been planning. Greenman (talk) 14:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Open Source First

The open source entries should be listed before the proprietary stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.23.166.141 (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Any reason? :) Greenman (talk) 11:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Of course: The badge on the page says "Free software portal" and then starts out to list commercial, decidedly non-free stuff first. Frankly, this is bordering fraud. Imho, there should be a different page for commercial CMS, where all the commercial listings be moved to instead, maybe with a link to that page (like "For commercial offerings, go to this page"). I also think that all packages should include a mandatory license field, with only OSI-approved licenses, or a subset thereof, being allowed. I have nothing against listing commercial CMS offerings in Wikipedia, but pretty please not on a page that claims to talk about "free software". 193.221.127.48 (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

But why would an article named "List of content management systems" be considered part of the free software portal? I could see it if the article was named "List of free content management systems", which it isn't. The name as given has nothing to do with free (as in speech) or not. If there is any reason for a "free software portal" link at all (which I doubt), the proper place would be at the bottom of the page somewhere. In any case, this page is not primarily about free software. It is about content management systems. 68.231.118.191 (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I think maybe it would be better to remove this from the free software portal then. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Django

I don't think Django is suitable in cms list. It's just a framework not a cms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.131.195.60 (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Agree, I've removed it. Greenman (talk) 12:30, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Add info on which CMS's are used most

Not sure how to integrate the information, but I think there should at least be a link somewhere to http://www.backendbattles.com/Content_Management_Systems. What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.16.193.254 (talk) 07:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

uCoz updates

The article uCoz has been updated by a non-registered user. Article now reads like an advert and Awards and References are dubious. uCoz is still clearly notable, but the article may need a revert; certainly a clean up. Sendalldavies (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

AdaptCMS Notability

All of the current references are on adaptcms.com and insanevisions.com (both domains have the same owner). I believe the article needs other references to satisfy notability guidelines. Sendalldavies (talk) 01:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Jahia

This page shoudl include Jahia in the Java Free and Open source section

Runs on mysql, oracle, hssql, mssql, postgresql Latest version 6 Licence GPL & Commercial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.246.62.76 (talk • contribs)

• We should wait and see how the AfD goes first. Haakon (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki

I am surprise not to find MediaWiki in this list Ahem85 (talk) 06:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Agree. I have no tech knowledge to put it in, but find very strange no one did insert it. I am even more surprised after seeing that the article about MediaWiki itself describes it as a content management system. 151.21.39.68 (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

I second this. I'd like to have mediawiki included in this list! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narasimhanator (talk • contribs) 19:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Mistake to be fixed

Free software is not the antonym of commercial software but of proprietary software. [2] Ditto open source. [3] This is a common mistake. Please fix it ASAP. 85.77.191.92 (talk) 08:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Good catch, fixed. Haakon (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Suggests: consolidate lists; compare features and details, not just details

Why are there a bunch of lists here. It's difficult to compare CMS the way this article is structured because they are separate lists. I would suggest the sections in this article become a column on a single unified table. If the user wants to see them organized in this way, the user can sort them this way, but is not forced to view them organized in this way.

Also, this comparison is less helpful because it really doesn't compare anything. There's no feature lists to compare. The lists here are really comparing details about each software that most users may not care about, or are less important. I came to this article because I was looking too see what CMS support integration with MediaWiki, have integrated wiki software, and various other features I find important. While the license the CMS is released under and the base language the software was written in are factors in my decision making process, ultimately, the way this article is structured is not at all helpful for the information I was looking for. Servel333 (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

I strongly agree, it just needs somebody with the energy to untangle the current structure and re-order it. Greenman (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

This article used to be called Comparisons of content management systems, but the title was changed for the very concerns you bring up. It is not intended to be shopping guide for or comprehensive comparison of CMS software, but a relatively simple list of Wikipedia articles on the topic. — Satori Son 13:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

suggest a cms

Under ASP.NET open source, there should be another CMS called Kooboo CMS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zguoqi (talk • contribs) 10:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Since that article was deleted five minutes before you made this comment (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kooboo), it is not eligible to be included in this list of notable CMS. — Satori Son 12:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Under ASP.NET Sitecore CMS should be listed. It was removed for some reason with a notation that Sitecore is a company and not a CMS. Sitecore is a company but their CMS is called "Sitecore CMS". http://www.sitecore.net/en/Products/Sitecore-CMS.aspx It seems like competitors are possibly deleting each other's platforms? 17:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)labarista —Preceding unsigned comment added by Labarista (talk • contribs)

MediaCore Video CMS

I would like to suggest the python open source CMS, MediaCore to be included to this page. The list of Python CMS's seems pretty short and it would be great to have another one in there.

• Name: MediaCore Video CMS
• Language: Python
• Supported databases: mySQL
• Latest stable: 0.7.2
• Date: 1 FEB 2010
• License: GPLv3
• Url: http://getmediacore.com

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplestation (talk • contribs) 08:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

There is not yet a Wikipedia article for MediaCore. If you think it is sufficiently notable, you can create an article for it, but be sure you provide citations to significant coverage by reliable sources. If you don't feel comfortable writing the article yourself, you can make a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles. — Satori Son 13:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Missing something

I may be missing something here but this list seems to be missing some of the most widely deployed CMS systems on the market. Documentum, Filenet, Opentext/Vignette. These are all major players in the CMS field but I don't see them in this list. Other commersial systems are listed so why are these ommitted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurospoofer (talk • contribs) 12:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

If there are Wikipedia articles for any of those, please do add them to this list article. Otherwise, WP:Write the Article First applies here and they should not be included. — Satori Son 13:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Day Communique 5.3

Can someone bump the current stable version to 5.3?

Also: version 5.3. uses a JSR-283 compliant repository, not JSR-170 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmarth (talk • contribs) 14:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Add phpWebLog to the list

phpWebLog was one of the first CMS weblog systems written in PHP. The last release was 0.5.3 dated 2001-10-31. phpWebLog is no longer supported, but was widely adopted in its day and was the basis for several PHP-based blog/CMS forks. Perhaps this should be included simply for historical reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oweff (talk • contribs) 20:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Jsalwen, 18 May 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Please add the following two entries under the ASP.NET CMS table, because they are both widely used and well documented. Sitecore ASP.NET SQL Server 2008, SQL Express 2008, Oracle, MySql 6.2 Umbraco ASP.NET MySQL, SQL Server and VistaDB Jsalwen (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Requests to edit semi-protected articles must be accompanied by reference(s) to reliable sources.

I suggest you get an account, then you can help us improve articles.  Chzz  ►  02:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

N Not done

Add OFBiz to the list

* http://ofbiz.apache.org/  It has a CMS plus other things, but it's still a CMS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.177.53 (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 

Alfresco information is wrong / out of date.

{{editsemiprotected}}

Informix is NOT a supported database [1], while Ingres is [2]. The latest release is 3.3, not 3.2 [3]. As of v3.3 Alfresco Community is released under LGPL [4].

[1] http://www.alfresco.com/services/subscription/supported-platforms/3-x/ [2] http://www.ingres.com/partners/alfresco/ [3] http://www.alfresco.com/products/editions/enterprise/3-3/ [4] http://newton.typepad.com/content/2010/01/a-shift-in-alfresco-community-license-to-lgpl.html

Pmonks (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Done -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 14:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 76.89.70.163, 17 June 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} The new WordPress CMS version 3.0 was just released, so the entry:

 WordPress         PHP     MySQL   2.9.2   GPL     2010-02-15

should now read:

 WordPress         PHP     MySQL   3.0     GPL     2010-06-17

-- Nile

76.89.70.163 (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Done Tim Pierce (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Drupal Version update

Drupal Stable Version 6.17 released on June 2nd 2010 Tomhung (talk) 21:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Frankvanzanten, 1 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} I'd want to add O3Spaces Workplace to the Software as a Service section:

Name	Platform	Licensed Version Available	Last stable version	Entry Level Pricing
uCoz	n/a	n/a	No
O3spaces	Java	Yes	3.2.1

Frankvanzanten (talk) 07:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Done Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 68.44.186.145, 10 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Please update current version of Drupal on this page to 6.17, released on 2010-06-02.

See: http://drupal.org/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal

Thanks.

68.44.186.145 (talk) 22:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Y Done. Thanks. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 22:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

GCMS main article missing

Under PHP, what is GCMS?

After doing a history search, I found out that it was a direct reference (no Wikipedia article) that I believe was put in by the developer on Oct 3, 2008. The link from that time is also dead. The user who added it hasn't made any other edits on any other date. Since there is no Wikipedia article, I have removed this reference. There may still be another GCMS, but this entry doesn't have any relation to it. Bye-bye GCMS. GuiderBob (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Venexnet, 18 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} |- |GT PWOS 1 |PHP5 |MySQL |1 |unknown |2009-08-10 |- Venexnet (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Done -- Nx / talk 20:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 151.59.87.141, 18 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}}

|GT PWOS 1 |PHP5 |MySQL |1 |unknown |2010-02

151.59.87.141 (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Done -- Nx / talk 20:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

liveSite

Could you please add liveSite by Camelback Web Architects to this great list of CMS systems? http://www.camelback.net/

Thank you, Camelbackwebarchitects (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

please add feindura flat file cms

Hi,

i'm the author of feindura - Flat File CMS (see feindura.org)

can you please add feindura to the list of PHP flat file cms? like this:

feindura PHP Flat-file database 1.0rc GPL 2010-07-25

thanks a lot! fabian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}} Radiant CMS updated - version: Refraction 0.9.1 released: (June 27, 2010)

Partly done: Radiant CMS was updated per the request. However, this page is for notable CMSs only. As a general guide for notability for this page, they should have their own article first. If you have any further questions/comments please reply here and place a {{talkback}} tag on my talk page. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

hm i cannot find it under the open source flat file cms...??

fabian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

See note above. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

ok means someone else have first to write an article about it? because if i write an article about it i think it would be considered as self proclamation :-) so i come back here if someone wrote something about it..!?

thanks anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey Fabian. You are welcome to create an article about Feindura, however, just make sure there is no conflict of interest and it is written from a neutral point of view. Though, I am more concerned about the notability of Feindura. For a CMS to be notable it should usually have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. (eg newspaper, online magazine article). I was unable to find any information about Feindura other than its website itself. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 01:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from TheMasquerade, 4 August 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Please can you include in the SaaS section:
Name: Website Breakout
Platform: ASP.NET
Licensed Version available: Yes
Last Stable Version = 1.0
URL: http://www.websitebreakout.com

and in the Proprietary software section:
Name: Breakout Management (CMS)
Platform: ASP.NET
Supported Database: MS Access (optional SQL Server)
Latest stable release: 1.0
Licenses: Proprietary software
Latest release date: 07/01/2010
URL: http://www.websitebreakout.com

TheMasquerade (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Not done for now: As per the Wikipedia policy on lists, entries can only be listed if they have their own article first. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 22:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Meryllmoreau, 5 August 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Hi there I would like to add Jahia open source solutions to the java CMS list |- |Jahia |Java |Postgres, MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 || |6.1 |GNU- GPL v2

More informations are available on the corporate website and community website: www.jahia.com www.jahia.org

Thanks for your work, wikipedia is a very good day to day tool

Meryllmoreau (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Not done: As per the Wikipedia policy on lists, entries can only be listed if they have their own article first. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

CMS G3

CMS G3 is a CMS which is used broadly in Europe, especially Switzerland. Its productizing is now heavily in development after 10 years of continuous development. Information will be updated in the web (wiki, website etc.) going forward. -- Aniello.bove (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMS G3. — Satori Son 15:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyleft

Are there really no CMSs that are under a copyleft license? 138.246.51.239 (talk) 18:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Webiva

I would suggest including Webiva in your list of CMS's as they are both open source and ruby-on-rails —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.119.81.135 (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

WebParser

I would suggest adding WebParser software. This tool allows to determine what CMS a website is using. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.48.12 (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Please add CLOUD CMS section

www.juicecloud.co.uk http://www.cloudinclude.com www.inzu.net Osmek

SyndeoCMS, Site@School

http://www.syndeocms.org/ http://siteatschool.org/ http://websiteatschool.eu/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.123.29.4 (talk) 10:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please add Z-Admin Small Business CMS for ASP.NET

With z-admin Small Business CMS you will get all the tools needed to create beautiful website. Manage Pages, Columns, Articles and News.Get response from Users by adding Polls and Comment Boxes anywhere on your site. Add external content from RSS feeds, XML or REST Web Service. With support from Themes, easily change your web site look. Need specific business logic functionality? No problem, z-admin CMS support modules and custom SQL bound items. Easy to use and free!

Easy to use You don't need any tutorials for this application. If you know how to use Microsoft Word or similar Word processing application, you will know how to write Articles and News, and create Pages. Let's keep things simple!

Module based Depending on selected theme, you can add modules and custom modules to dedicated areas on web site. You can add module inside Article. You can easily change any part of web site; don't like Main Menu on top ? No problem, delete it and insert module into area you wish.

Themes Completely change your website look, from simple page background to position of modules. Every kind of HTML can be easily converted to dynamic template. No programming skills needed. Convert existing static HTML website to z-admin dynamic website!

Roles / Logins Add unlimited number of Roles, and unlimited number of Users. Users can login to z-admin and write Articles, Polls, etc. With Roles you allow/disallow specific modules to user (e.g. allow user to write Articles, but disallow him to change modules on a website).

File Manager z-admin CMS includes File Manager with common functionalities, upload files, rename, move and copy files, delete files and folders. ZIP selected files. Download files, even restricted ones (like web.config, etc.). For most common tasks, you don't need external FTP program.

Twitter & Youtube Two of most popular web services are embedded inside z-admin. Create unlimited number of Twitter Widgets and YouTube video galleries.

Custom Items Completely redefine presentation of any Items in z-admin! Handle how Articles, News, Columns, Menus or any other Items are shown. Also, create custom SQL Table and use this module to display data! Define templates for Header, Footer, Item and Alternating Item and Separator. Write CSharp code along with SQL.

Dynamic Text Add Dynamic text formatted on Server! Use C# language to format text and display it on screen. Possible uses are: read Time/Date, get value from Database, read URL, get user Regional settings, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoran123456 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Orchard

The most recent build of Orchard apparently doesn't support MySql (in fact only SQL Server and SQL Sever CE is supported). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlaySharp (talk • contribs) 14:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Pines CMS

So I recently added Pines CMS to the list and it was removed because it doesn't have its own article. My question is, considering it's a very new CMS (first stable release Nov 12), is it notable enough to justify its own article? It's been around for about 3 years, but only with dev releases. It's certainly a bigger project (codebase wise) than most other CMSs on the list, but isn't as widely used. Some of its subprojects, like Pines Notify, are actually notable and fairly widely used, but not the CMS itself. And it does have quite a few development features that no other PHP CMS has. For example, a package manager and format written in all PHP. Anyway, I didn't want to create the article unless it was actually notable enough. Guywithcable (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Guywithcable, please review the WP:N guideline. I hope it will help you to decide if the article about Pines CMS worth spending time on its writing. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)