Talk:David E. Nichols

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Old deletion debate: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David E. Nichols

  1. == what more is needed? ==

I'm in a position to possibly expand this article. What more is needed for it? More on what his lab does? More on him?

aloha
psilo

[edit] POV?

Among scientists, he is considered to be the world's top expert on the chemistry and pharmacology of psychedelics.

Actually, the generic class of "scientists" contains rather few people who have much of a clue about the pharmacology of psychedelics or even the relative cluefulness of experts in the field. Maybe the statement should be qualified. Is he considered world's top expert among pharmacologists? Chemists? DEA agents? Psychologists? Anyone involved in research related to psychedelics (a notoriously multidisciplinary topic...)? On whose authority do we take it that the topness of his expertise is toppier than that of Sasha Shulgin or Albert Hoffman?

The Swiss chemist who discovered/invented LSD spells his name "Hofmann". Some of Nichols' papers are coauthored by a "A. Hoffman", but that's a completely different fellow, an American who was one of Nichols' graduate students in the mid-1980s. Merenta

[edit] Grammar

"Although his research mostly uses rats, a number of compounds included in Shulgin's PIHKAL were actually first synthesized in Nichols's lab"

Im failing to see the connection between usually using rats, and synthesizing chemicals in his own lab.. there is nothing to suggest that these compounds were for human research, which i feel this sentence implies.

Rats can be kept anywhere.. Compounds can be moved to other locations once synthesized..

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export