 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of standardized, informative and easy-to-use resources about languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
v · d · eThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
"some of them mutually unintelligible" if they are dialects of a language they must be mutually unintelligible. Ericd 21:50, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Fair enough, though you should check out dialect continuum for a counterexample :P. I've changed 'dialects' to 'varieties'. — mark ✎ 14:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- Actually, unless I'm mistaken, dialects of each other do not have to be mutually intelligible. At least, that's what a professor said on the topic. Alexander 007 17:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- The issue with 'dialect' is precisely that professors say one thing, speakers another, SIL yet another, and the government probably again another thing. — mark ✎ 21:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Stub categorization
I added 2 stub categories. This article has quite a bit, but could be expanded to include some info in the suggested template. --A12n 04:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
