Talk:Eerie, Indiana

Archives

Archive 1 - Aug 2004 to Jan 2005

Tagged for Cleanup

I never watched the show, but reading the entry feels very fanish and non-encyclopediotic. Nothing is really cited, and the information is jumbled and needs copy editing for proper spelling, grammar, usage, tone, style, and voice. I'm fussing with it, but again, I don't have enough personal context with the show to do more than the basics. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 16:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks everyone for helping! -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 06:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The link to Archie Hahn directs to the sprinter, not the actor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.39.133.168 (talk) 10:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Books

Wasn't there a book series modelled after this as well?

I've done some research and found some books modeled after the series. So far I've only been abkle to find them on Amazon. I'll probably add some information about it later. ShadowJester07 19:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Reverting Lynchian absurdity?

Why revert the Lynchian absurdity? The whole show was Lynchian, I swear to G-d that Joe Dante is a David Lynch fan. Corroboration of the Lynchian genre would be easy to acquire; I know a PhD in Film Studies who completely agrees with my assessment. Or, just watch Mulholland Drive, then revert in good conscience. Donna Reed was *absolutely* parodied in Foreverware. (I have the Eerie DVD and everything David Lynch has ever done.) 216.138.194.68 23:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)/Yiddophile (too lazy to log in)

Agreement from a friend is not corroboration on Wikipedia. Find referencable bibliographia, and I'll be the first to support your mention of the show as Lynchian. --Chr.K. 07:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

International

If anyone starts an international section the show was on Stöð 2 in Iceland [1]. --Stalfur 14:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dollhouseford.jpg

Image:Dollhouseford.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hour-long blocks?

The original air dates listed for some of the episodes suggests that they were initially aired in hour-long blcoks. If this is the case, it ought to be mentioned. I do remember the latter part of the run was aired oddly and difficult to find. I didn't see most of the retooled episodes until syndication or DVD. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)