Talk:Epilepsy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Epilepsy was one of the good article nominees, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
October 14, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed
WikiProject Medicine / Translation / Neurology / Psychiatry (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that this article follows the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Translation task force (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Neurology task force (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Psychiatry task force (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Neuroscience (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Disability (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon Epilepsy is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


Contents

[edit] Untitled

Previous discussions have been archived here: Archive 1; Archive 2.

[edit] Purple Day

Greetings all. Last night, a section on Purple Day was removed from the article. The reason cited was that it did not meet Wikipedia's reliable source criteria. However, upon a little research, "Purple Day" (http://www.purpleday.org/) "Purple Day is an international grassroots effort dedicated to increasing awareness about epilepsy worldwide. On March 26th annually, people in countries around the world are invited to wear purple and host events in support of epilepsy awareness. In 2011, people in dozens of countries on all continents except Antarctica participated in Purple Day. With your help, Purple Day 2012 will be even bigger!". Now, purpleday.org is an affiliation between Epilepsy Foundation Association of Nova Scotia (EANS) and The Anita Kaufmann Foundation of New York (AKF). Does anyone have any input on this regarding Wikipedia:RS? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aneah (talkcontribs) 13:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


[edit] Reviews

Time for an update:

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Indeed. I have been meaning to overhaul (not merely update) this page for some time. This should be the year I do it. Thanks for collecting those reviews. I plan to add to these and possibly some books too. It won't be a quick process, I'm afraid. Colin°Talk 08:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes none of these huge topic are. Seizure and epilepsy are closely related which makes writing about them a little difficult.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Source citation format

I'm planning a major overhaul of this article. Currently, I'm reading some big textbooks on the subject. I would appreciate two changes to the citations and per WP:CITEVAR I'm requesting the change here.

  • Move from the {{cite}} template family to hand-formatted citations in Vancouver style, which is the style often used in medical journal articles. It is easy to format by simply taking the citation from PubMed search results and moving the author-list before the title. This will greatly help page-formating time when the article is edited/previewed and loaded, reduce the bulk of the HTML generated for the reader, and eliminate unnecessary bloat in the edit window.
  • Move to using list-defined references (see also Wikipedia:Citing sources#Avoiding clutter). This is a big aid to organising and keeping track of references used in an article. It makes it easy to add HTML comments against sources. It also makes the text easy to read in the edit window.

See ketogenic diet for an example. Colin°Talk 19:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export