Talk:Ergoline

Rest naming

The rest naming and numbering is misleading and not standard. The images should be redrawn, rest names should be R¹ (indole-1 position), R^amide (amide N-substituent)... Cacycle 19:24, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Split

I oppose the splitting off of information on the ergoline derivatives. Most of the article is about them, including most of the material that was not split off. At the least, the splitted article should not be orphaned as it currently is. I'm going to re-insert the material just to make it available until either the split is abandonded or someone can re-craft the main article to properly refer to the derivatives article.--Russell E 11:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I do not see why there should be an article 'ergoline derivatives', if this article just gets a {{chembox new}}/{{drugbox}}, then all the derivatives can get a link there (field Other Compounds), and this directory like information can just go. This article is about the main ergoline, an article on all the derivatives is going to be a huge list of compounds, seen the number of possible substituents. Most of the articles mentioned here have an own article anyway, and the rest should have (one could consider a category for them, of course). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Moreover, most are already in the {{ergolines}}-box at the bottom. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I oppose the split, but I think the article desperately needs cleanup. Fuzzform 00:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Agree I am with the splitting of this article to the ergoline derivaties. The page Ergoline will be the Main article in the category:Ergolines which will contain compounds of different pharmacological categories. User:حسن علي البط

There is no consensus for this split, so I have removed the split tag. If there is a new split proposal, then a new tag with a new date needs to be placed on the article along with a rationale on this talkpage. SilkTork *^YES! 22:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Table Ergoline Peptides of Nature.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Table Ergoline Peptides of Nature.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)