Talk:FBLA-PBL

Quit Making It A Stub

While I do agree that we do not need to teach all of FBLA-PBL's techniques, we can't have the article just sit here as a stub with no meaningful information. Other CTSOs have detailed pages, why can't FBLA's? Again, we don't need to be TOO specific, but still, sections regarding membership, programs, and conferences should be kept, along with anything else considered meaningful and appropriate for a Wiki. --Millipedeman (talk) 17:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Because the information you are adding is directly copied from the FBLA website and that is a copyright violation. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I didn't add it, someone else did. But still, we shouldn't have just a stub. --Millipedeman (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I agree on that statement. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 14:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Officers

Per discussion on the [National Forums], officers have been removed. Please continue all discussion in this section of the talk page. Atomic Taco 17:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Creed, Mission, Pledge, and Dress Code

I added the creed, mission, pledge, and dress code and it was removed according to "copyright violation". Is this really an issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.117.95.99 (talk) 17:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it's an issue for two reasons: One it is a copyright violation to be taking the organization's codes and such and posting it here. Two it is not necessary for this article. We give a summary of ideas; we do not need to teach every aspect of FBLA-PBL such as what the full dress code is. either way (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)