Talk:F for Fake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

(Rated Start-class)

Film portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is on the project's core list.

This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

[edit] Spoilers

Considering the nature of this film, shouldn't this have a spoiler warning somewhere ?

[edit] Second to last?

All of the information I can muster points to this being Welles's last completed film, not his penultimate. Can anyone offer evidence to the contrary? ColinKennedy 17:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I changed that. Looking at it again, the whole article needs a rewrite. I'll start on that. ColinKennedy 14:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sections needed

I agree with Supernumerary's assessment as class Start, but I do see the need of introducing sections. As it is it looks like a huge lead section. Hoverfish 09:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks to everyone who worked on this page. I found it very informative.

[edit] Revisions

The article was reading too much like a movie review, so I have removed POV content as much as I could. It still needs work. 23skidoo 18:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:F for Fake

Contents

[edit] Spoilers

[edit] Second to last?

[edit] Sections needed

[edit] Thanks

[edit] Revisions

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export