 |
This is not a forum for general discussion of Feminazi. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Feminazi at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] A question
Why is more of this article dedicated to Rush Limbaugh than to the definition of "Feminazi". In fact, Limbaugh(22X) is mentioned more often than "Feminazi"(10X) is. I went to Limbaugh's page thinking that maybe "Feminazi" would get more press there, but no. Only mentioned three times. I think Wikipedia has to get its editors straight on what their job is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.85.201 (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a problem, particularly since it seems to not be able to decide if it's a term disparaging all feminists (which it isn't) or its most extreme flavors (which it applies more to). In my experience, it's applied normally to gender feminists, who have done things like advocate forcing women into the workforce because some women were deciding raising children was more rewarding for them, and the article ought to be adjusted to reflect what it's supposed to be about more, and the meaning of the term. 174.98.43.150 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
I don't see why I was blocked from editing on this site just for begging to differ with your statement that not all feminist are misandric subjugaters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.247.133 (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Far Right?
I don't think so. I am a member of the Tea Party, a Libertarian and I assure you that I am not anti-feminist. To me this just sounds like an attempt to imply that conservatives are anti-feminists. 71.31.60.236 (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Unsubstantiated claims
The reference following the last 2 sentences of the page does not support the assertion made. Also it reads like a political speech. Zimbazumba (talk) 05:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
