Talk:Folkspraak
| WikiProject Constructed languages | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Don't delete!
This is an article (or, should I say, a stub) in its own right - there is one on Esperanto Wikipedia and several others so there can be one on this wiki too.
The language has its web sites, its proponents and its very active community (just take a look at the Yahoo group). So if there can be and article on Esperanto, Volapük or any other artificial language (provided that a certain amount of time has passed and that the language has therefore proved itself to be more than a fad) there can be one on Folkspraak. --ArkinAardvark (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] 60's origin?
I'm not sure on the 60's origin. I have never seen that fact independently corroborated. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Unified Folkspraak
There seems to be on the Yahoo group the beginnings of a unified Folkspraak, as opposed to the previous case where there were many "dialects" being developed on as candidates for a central idea. Messages after 26 August on the yahoo discussion group seem to confirm this direction, and the Files/Vordboken section (must join as a member to view) has a very recent (as of writing this) dictionary with words in this direction (although it may be edited very soon given that some words are under scrutiny by the makers to see if they can be improved). This may be useful for future revisions of the article if things continue to progress for Folkspraak. Ceigered (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Diacritics
not used? Orksprak example suggests otherwise... Errarel (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
