|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
|
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
| |
|
|
|
This article is about one (or many) Thing(s). |
|
|
|
|
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any sections with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
[edit] United States v. Jones
No mention of this case? Are you people high? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.14.228.170 (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- When the Supreme Court rules on the case, then it will be added to the article. SMP0328. (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- A little strange considering that's not the way other Wikipedia treatments of Supreme Court rulings on big issues have gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.14.228.170 (talk) 01:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly, Supreme Court rulings. The Supreme Court has not ruled in this case yet. It only heard oral argument today. SMP0328. (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I was of course referring to treatment of Supreme Court rulings PRE-RULING, i.e. discussions of lower court decisions, SCOTUS oral argument (which occurred today), and expert opinions on the matter. Obviously we're all not just waiting on a vote.98.14.228.170 (talk) 02:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)signed (this whole signing thing is ridiculous)
- It's not just a vote. The vote is part of the ruling (the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to...). Once there is a ruling, that ruling we be put in the article. SMP0328. (talk) 02:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
A decision has been handed down in this case and the article has been updated to reflect that decision. SMP0328. (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)