Talk:Halliburton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Companies (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Business (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Houston (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Houston on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex in northern Texas (USA) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States / Texas (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject United Arab Emirates / Dubai (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Dubai.
 
WikiProject Oklahoma (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Contents

[edit] Gang Rape Victim

Why isn't the incident involving the gang rape of Jamie Leigh Jones, who was sent to Iraq to work for Halliburton, mentioned? http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=3977702&page=1 Galraedia (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Updated History Section

I propose some serious changes to the history section, particularly to the '2000s'. We all know Haliburton and their subsidiaries have had some serious controversies, but starting the 2000s section off with the opening of a completely different legal entity in Tehran isn't a great way to begin, is it? This should be moved to a separate controversies section entirely as its relevant but WP:Recentism appears to be a big player here. There is also far too much explanation in the historical section about subsidiaries or implications of illegal activity. All of this needs to be moved, possibly to an entirely new article regarding corporate crime or whatever, its drawing out the section into this tumorous mass of angst towards the company (well deserved or not).

Should no one respond in the next few days, I'll remove the items I feel are very testy and place them under the controversies section. Netsquall (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] OK... Seriously?

Halliburton FTW! The extent to which this article details Dick Cheney's involvement with Haliburton, and all that implies vis a vie recent history, is relegated to references to mentions in popular media? This is a mockery of what Wikipedia is supposed to be. Who is in charge here, anyway? The people who want to tell the _truth_, or the people who want to cover it up when it doesn't serve their interests? Impartial? I don't think this article is, by any stretch. This is an obvious cover-up and white-wash. That makes it a mockery of every revision that has ever been rescinded for partiality reasons on the whole of Wikipedia. Gee... I was going to contribute my annual $20 tonight, then I found this travesty. You know what? I don't think I'll contribute this year. My little, insignificant, protest against this sort of hypocrisy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.130.225 (talk) 05:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Baghdad incident

So, an "investigation revealed that troops did not abandon the civilians and they were all exiting the "kill zone" during the ambush". Isn't that the same thing? The national guardsmen exiting the killing zone in haste during the ambush - leaving the civilian drivers to be killed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

You don't stay in a zone of fire during an ambush, you get out and you maneuver against the enemy forces perpetrating it, which is what they did. -173.166.45.177 (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Grammar

"a convoy of four Halliburton trucks was ambushed north of Baghdad."

How can I believe the author when I can't believe his grammar?

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export