Talk:Heckle and Jeckle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heckle and Jeckle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability
Archives: 1

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Animation / American

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

Animation portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build and improve coverage of animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, help out with the to-do page, or visit the project page to join the project, or contribute to the discussions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Accessibility: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> \| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


	This article is supported by the American animation work group.

WikiProject Comics / United States

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

Comics portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:

	United States comics work group

WikiProject Fictional characters

(Rated Start-class)

Fictional characters portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

[edit] FYI

The section is full of unsourced trivial information that in list form and is not vital to the article existence. So it must be removed to help improve the article as a whole.

The caption is not redundant, it help to be descriptive to it's point while not causing the image to a mere garnish. Sarujo (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

The section clearly shows that H&J retain relevance in popular culture. You may tag it for the time being, but deleting it entirely is not helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Rackinfrackin (talk • contribs) 19:36, 22 February 2012

No, all the section does is list trivia that makes bold claims without anything to back it up. When you are making an article, you must always verify everything with reliable sources. Otherwise it has no real place in the article. Lets not forget that it's in list form.

Also, Rackinfrackin when you post a comment, please take the time to sign your name with "~~~~". Sarujo (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Heckle and Jeckle

[edit] FYI

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export