 |
Discussions often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
|
 |
This page has been mentioned by a media organization. The reference is in:
|
|
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the socialist movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections with no replies in 60 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
[edit] Wobbly Shop
I have modified this because the idea is to delegate people to functions (and they're without privileges, subject to immediate recall), rather than to install managers who would control workers. This very seriously misrepresents the organisation's policy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.70.213 (talk • contribs) 23 Jan 2006.
[edit] I just undid this edit
-
- "but a near-consensus of members and academics reports it to come from a type of saw common in IWW-organised lumber camps in the early days of the union (1905-1924)."
- on the theory that if there is "near consensus" then it should be easy to footnote. My copy of Rebel Voices, for example, says "origin unknown." Carptrash (talk)
[edit] Members?
Is there a source for the 12,000 current members in the IWW? Previous edits claimed there were 2,000 members with about 900 in good standing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.44.169 (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Attorney General Thomas Campbell Clark
Clark was no longer U.S. Attorney General in 1950 having been appointed to the Supreme Court in 1949 so either it was another AG or was before 1950 if it indeed was Clark who declared the IWW "subversives". I tried to research this online to no avail.
- good catch! i found a source for IWW having been placed on list; it could have been clark that did it because according to source, it happened in 1949. however, the source doesn't say who did it, so i rewrote the sentence so that it didn't say either. a closer look at that whole sentence reveals many problems, though. i'll continue to look into it.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- i found a source for its being tom clark that did it; it's just that the year was wrong. the sentence is far too long, but i can't yet find sources for the rest of the facts stated in it, so i'm leaving it alone for now.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)