Talk:Institute for Historical Review
| WikiProject Jewish history | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
|
Contents |
[edit] I fixed an error
There was an opinion stated as a fact in the first sentence of this article. I fixed the error by deletion of the opinion. I believe in free speech, but not manipulation of information. Please, folks, stick to the facts and let the smart people come up with their own conclusions. By stating opinion as fact one leaves themselves vulnerable to accusations of being a propaganda peddler and their original cause can backfire. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.55.157 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 29 April 2007
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WIhr.jpg
Image:WIhr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tax status
I think the referenced info that this is a Holocaust denial organization is much more important than its tax status. Most "think tank"s are non for profit, nothing notable in this. Thus, I have reverted the IPs changes Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] First Refernce is Stupid
A jew calling an antizionist Crime site Pseudo scholarly, that's just Biased, if it was a third party then it would be understandable, it's not a fresh Perspective, thus not neutral.--AntiMarxist (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
[edit] "non" peer-review
How is the journal of historical review "non" peer reviewed? It is ideologically fringe, but certainly peer reviewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.251.220 (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- "Peer review" in academic publishing refers to a very specific, formal process for reviewing academic work prior to publication. It doesn't just mean that some other people have seen the work. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 18:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
