Talk:Kannadiga
| ↓ | Skip to table of contents | ↓ |
| Discussions on this page may escalate into heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. See also: Wikipedia:Etiquette. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kannadiga article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Archives: 1 | |||
| This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article uses Indian English dialect and spelling. Some terms that are used in it differ from or are not used in British, American or other dialects of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Kannadiga or Canarese/Canaresian?
The native word for Kannada people "Kannadiga" does not seem to harmonize with the soundscapes of the English language - it is as odd as saying "tamil makkal" or "tamil jana" in English - one uses what is natural to English - "Tamilian". I suggest the word "Canarese" or "Canaresian" be employed in the place of "Kannadiga" in this article (mentioning though "Kannadiga is the native word for Kannada people). ~~Naresh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.244.253 (talk) 06:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
The word Canarese is no longer used,this word was used by British ans Portuguese only during the colonial era.Nijgoykar (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- The people are now generally referred to as Kannadigas, and not just by these people themselves. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 09:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality
This article is way out of control.Pls add relevant sections and follow wikipedia policy...Pls visit the Tamil people page and see how a good ethnic article must be developed...And pls use neutral point of view....Thanks.... ARUNKUMAR P.RTalk 11:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- True this article is a mess remove all unreferenced povs (OR)--NotedGrant Talk 14:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Removed irrelevant and POV section.Still the article needs to be structured like the Tamil people article which is a featured article.
ARUNKUMAR P.RTalk 09:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I am really surprised to read Wikipedia about Kannadiga section. I don't know why Kannadigas are always comparing or treating Tamil language/Tamilians in a harsh way. Afterall Tamil,Telugu,Tulu,Malayalam and Kannada are dravidian languages. We are in a single group. Dravidian language is a single language. The amount of influence of Sanskrit gave out new names such as Telugu, Tulu, Malayalam, Kannada ..etc. If for some reason Kannadigas accept that Kannada is a bye-product of Sanskrit then all Kannadigas must be Aryans? But the problem is we should also accept Mandya/Hassan Gowdas as Aryans? Will the world agree? Please do not compare Tamil with Kannada at any point of time? I would also like add one more thing? Cholas were great tamil kings, but during their time only tamil literacy level was too low; no new works were done. It is history. you cannot change it. Every one is envying tamilnadu because in all the fields/offices, you can only see black people. Backward community development is much more here in Tamilnadu. It has liberated from British with India and liberated from Brahminsm with EVR who is a Kannadiga. Todays Tamilnadu is made by EVR though he never ruled Tamilnadu like MK.Gandhi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.110.2 (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
MR can you tell us how Mandya/Hassan Gowdas for Aryans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.172.167.129 (talk) 11:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Vijay Mallya
Kindly see the Goud Saraswat Brahmin page of Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.52.53.206 (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
do not write anything againt Tamils. This is not a forum to vent your anger and personal attacks
dinesh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshpkm (talk • contribs) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Non Kannadiga
There are few non-kannadigas included the list of Kannidigas. Some even featured in the info box with pics, like Nanadan Nelkini, Deepika Padukone etc. Please remove those names from the list.188.49.24.149 (talk) 08:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism!
The user User:Malini.iyyer has removed important and glorifying points from this article which which according to her are not essential.On top she is way to her way of communicating with others is very uncivil.check this out [[1]].Let me know if the contents she had removed was unnecessary.It is important according to me(Its my personal opinion and does not really matter much here).Clearly her edits have some sort of personal agenda.Lets discuss. Nijgoykar (talk) 02:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:Purandara.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Purandara.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- High-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class Karnataka articles
- Low-importance Karnataka articles
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- C-Class Karnataka articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Articles which use Indian English