Talk:Legal formalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Law | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Philosophy | (Rated Start-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It says "...in order to assure that the law serves good public policy and social interests." I'd have expected it to say "...in order to assure that the law serves justice." Am I naive in that regard? Michael Hardy 17:10, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)
- yes--anonymous comment.
Also, this entry needs to be expanded. There should be discussion of original meaning & textualism, also need more on criticisms of legal formalism. User:Lsolum
[edit] Too contrastual
Nearly half of this article is actually about Legal Realism. Why not, instead of teaching by comparison, we let them know exactly what Legal Formalism is?
Categories:
- Start-Class legal articles
- Mid-importance legal articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles