Talk:List of celebrities who have been the subject of pranks on Punk'd

I'm Planning to remodel the first section based on the charts of all 4 major sports(Excluding NFL). Second Semi-section of the first section has been modified. And I'm scheduling to remodel the remaining parts of the first section based on the format on all MLB teams article roster section.

What the hell is up with the flags?

What relevance do the flags have? Some of them are inaccurate, some of them are just pedantic, and they serve no purpose, whatsoever. I'm going to remove them, they are completely irrelevant. --Kiand 22:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is up with the flags?

About those flags, the flags represent the nationalities of every celebrities that has been punk'd at the end of season 6.

Which is entirely pointless, as nobody but you cares. --Kiand 06:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Then if my plan failed, then could you help me finish making this chart because it is going to take me a whole lot of time.

What is up with the colors?

Please explain what the colors mean. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC) The colors represent the following team colors where they play right now, except for Jerome Bettis and Terrell Owens. For example, Baby blue with golden font represents Denver Nuggets and Hawaiian Blue with silver font represents Detroit Lions. --User:BigBang11 16:14 PST, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Considering its completely context-less, it makes even less sense than the flags. --Kiand 00:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Breaking News: Terrell Owens has just signed with the Dallas Cowboys and be aware of that the font founded on Terrell Owens' row is now in Royal Blue, one of Cowboys' team color. User:BigBang11 01:04 PST, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Replacing this page

This page will be replaced with "Category:List of Celebrities who have been Punk'd" after the category is completed BigBang11 22:24 PST, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I am strongly against such a move. For one, why redo all the work to put it into a category? More importantly though, I think categories should be reserved for more important things. Has appearing on Punk'd changed an actor's life enough to be notable? Where does it stop? Do we make categories for every show that someone has appeared on? My point is, doing so will clutter up the category boxes. Unless appearing on Punk'd has radically changed the person, I think leaving it as a list is a much better alternative. The category doesn't seem very useful to me and seems like over-categorization to me and would best be left as a list. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Please don't. The list is fine - it's a central place for all readers who want to see which celebrities have been Punk'd. Categories are reserved for things which are more noteworthy than a few minutes on Punk'd. The category is probably going to be deleted, so let's keep the list. Rhobite 16:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Numbering

In order to make sense, we should start numbering this article BigBang19 21:44 PST, 23 April 2006

Finch

The citation to the Finch website contains on article called Punk'd. But it's not Ashton, and in fact goes on to say they weren't really punk'd, but got in a fight instead. I won't delete it, in case Finch have actually been punk'd, but another citation would be useful.

Summary

Perhaps it would be nice to have a short summary of the punk skit for referance. Anyone else have any thoughts? --DragonWR12LB 20:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Clean ups

I'm ready to cut this article into smaller parts to make it a little simple. User:BigBang19 16:01 PST, 6/8/2006

Merge with List of celebrities who have been Punk'd from Season 6 to Present

I think this should be merged with List of celebrities who have been Punk'd from Season 6 to Present. It would make much more sense to have all the information in one place and even combined they are still below the 32KB Wikipedia:Article size suggests as a limit. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

It is not a good idea because I was able to split some articles into three including the acomplise section from the main article to avoid futher coruption (in this case Punk'd). (Talk) 16:29, 26 December 2006 (PST)

Agree. Why arbitrarily split? The articles aren't that long. Also, I'm not quite sure what the above vote means... AdamSolomon 04:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

yeah all the punk'd should be on one page however i think the tables should be seperated into season and put into episode order rather than name order. i will give it a go, and see what people think. Mad onion 18:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

What is the 'Hall of Shame'?

No really, what is it? I'm familiar with the show, although I almost never watch it. I don't know what the Hall of Shame is, nor can I find an answer within the first 5 pages of google. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.78.106.209 (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

• This needs to be explained and hopefully sourced. if the information didnt come from the series itself it had to come from somewhere.Mad onion 17:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

We Need More Celebrates To Punk...Maybe Roland Emmerich, John Cusack or Arnold Swatchnigger etc...Bigger Celebs Need To Be Punk'd

"This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards."

The only thing that bothers me, some entries were apparently only added somewhere on the list. And some are sorted with their given name, as Ashlee Simpson, though Ashanti should still be before Simpson. Maybe the sorting of list can also be counted as a cleanup, don't know. 85.217.22.58 (talk) 12:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)