Talk:Loretta Young

Intros

According to The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows, by television researchers Tim Brooks and Earle Marsh, which is recognized as an authoritative work, it was the introductions to her shows, where she appeared out of character as herself, which were forbidden to be rebroadcast; the shows themselves, both ones in which she had appeared and those which she had merely hosted, were frequently rerun; in fact, all of the programs, less her intros, were rerun on NBC in the daytime from 1960 to 1964 as The Loretta Young Theatre, additionally, they appeared for years in syndication. Rlquall 20:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Controversy?

Just an annoying thought. Is controversy really the best title of that section? There wasn't so much controversy as speculation. Something like Clark Gable affair would be less dramatic in my opinion. EconomicsGuy (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Controversy

The last sentence in the "Controversy" section is confusing. Is Loretta Young saying that she is the 'walking mortal sin", or is she referring to her daughter? 70.237.190.30 (talk) 01:47, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Mike

Religious categories

Please do not add religious categories without verifiable and reliable sources. Please do not revert categories without discussion. Thank you. Span (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I fully agree. The category was added back without source again, but I took the liberty of adding several sources that sufficiently support the category along with Young's worth with various Catholic charities. Editors need to be aware that citing "common knowledge" or a talk page discussion as a basis for inclusion does not comply with WP:V and WP:RS. It took me all of three minutes to find several different sources that support the category. That was work that should have been done by the person who wanted the category added (see WP:BURDEN). Pinkadelica^♣ 00:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your added sources, Pinkadelica. Span (talk) 01:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Pinkadelica^♣ 02:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

"Citation needed"

This has been up since January 2010. One problem I found was William Holden being listed as involved in Republican politics in Hollywood, while his own article says he was a friend of Reagan, but never involved in party politics. Citation obviously needed, or else needs to be removed. Others may add other points here, thank you. --Paul Pieniezny (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)